Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2010, 07:04 PM
compress ignite's Avatar
Drone aspiring to Serfdom
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 32(degrees) North by 81(degrees) West
Posts: 5,554
Every time I "Re-Discover this , I laugh.

I know you've all seen these.

(Funny thing...engine with smallest CID has the biggest Rods)

Attached Thumbnails
Every time I "Re-Discover this , I laugh.-screenhunter_02-apr.-12-19.01.jpg  
__________________
'84 300SD sold
124.128
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2010, 07:12 PM
daw_two's Avatar
diesel enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 5,449
And now you know why I drive a Dodge truck...........when not driving a Mercedes car.
__________________
daw_two
Germantown, TN

Links:
Sold last car --- 05/2012 1984 300D Light Ivory, Red interior
Cluster Needles Paint
New Old Stock (NOS) parts

Past:
3/2008 1986 300SDL "Coda"
04/2010 1965 190D(c) "Ben"
& many more
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2010, 07:14 PM
SirNik84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 1,470
why is does the dodge rod have an angled cap? is that a cummins rod?
__________________
1983 Toyota Tercel 4WD Wagon - 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300SD 4-Speed(My Car!) 2005 C230 Kompressor 6-Speed Manual
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2010, 09:07 PM
compress ignite's Avatar
Drone aspiring to Serfdom
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 32(degrees) North by 81(degrees) West
Posts: 5,554
Yes ,Cummins

'Have to ask the Engineers @ Cummins ?
(It may have something to do with angles of rotation and Max. exerted force)
__________________
'84 300SD sold
124.128
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-2010, 11:55 PM
DrewGerhan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grove City, OH
Posts: 729
Id rank rod size in order of which Id buy first. Dodge, Ford, Chevy. I wonder if there is a connection?
__________________
1981 300 SD 213k miles "Stock for now"
1999 Super Duty 7.3L 113k miles
1981 300 SD 180k miles "Heavily modified" SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2010, 12:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
The Ford's rod appears thin.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000)

1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000)

1978 Porsche 924 (99000)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2010, 06:00 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
The angled rod cap allows a bigger bearing in a given cylinder bore, (it is a matter of fitting through the cylinder bore) also featured in the old Ferrari 250 ,motor from the fifties and a ford flathead 60 that I happen to know of.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2010, 08:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waterloo Illinois
Posts: 1,336
I also drive a Dodge Cummins when not driving my Mercedes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2010, 08:30 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,844
yeah... I gotta agree, the PS rod looks mealy next to the chebby rod... GOD that Cummins Rod (can't call it a dodge, I just can't...) I have 4 Detroit Diesel (chevy) in my yard... I drive one daily, and love it... just can't stand the stinking transmission.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-14-2010, 06:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by compress ignite View Post
'Have to ask the Engineers @ Cummins ?
(It may have something to do with angles of rotation and Max. exerted force)

Yes, I think this is the primary reason. I have certainly heard the other reason given (fitting through the bore). The MGA and MGB engines are examples of the two designs being used with essentially the same bore diameter and rod journal diameter. The non-angled version survived to be used in the later 5-main engines. It is pretty interesting when you can follow developmental trends in an engine design over decades.

I think the angled rods would be optimal with low rpm engines. In high rpm engines the fasteners would come under greater shear forces and the design has inherent stress raisers. Note how the Dodge/Cummins rod is heavily reinforced on the beam section next to the parting line with the upper fastener -- not an accident. This is a common point of failure in the angled MGA/MGB rods under competition use.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-14-2010, 08:31 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by compress ignite View Post
I know you've all seen these.

(Funny thing...engine with smallest CID has the biggest Rods)
it has the smallest CID, but two fewer cyllinders, so it has the MOST stress on each rod of the three.
I think MB could sure use those rods in their 3.5L inline six...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
1987 300TD
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2010, 09:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 4,154
The only problem with the Dodge is the truck they put around that wonderful engine. Of course, the 24v is a downgrade from the 12.
__________________
85SD 240K & stopped counting painted, putting bac together. 84SD 180,000. sold to a neighbor and member here but I forget his handle. The 84 is much improved from when I had it. 85TD beginning to repair to DD status. Lots of stuff to do.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-14-2010, 12:21 PM
KCM KCM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 645
When talking about the Cummins, you have to remember that the engine was not originally designed for automotive applications, but for industrial and off-road. Thus the engine is overbuilt for pickup applications.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-15-2010, 08:35 PM
RUN-EM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 313
Could it be ?????????/

That by relying on the slanted surface, it is kinda like sloped armour on a tank giving extra thickness for strength?

Regards
__________________
1983 300SD - SPARKY THE DIESEL
2004 Audi TT 3.2 Quattro Roadster
1999 SLK - aka - LIL RED
1956 Chevy Nomad - aka - REAL MAD
1940 Ford dbl dr. Deluxe - aka - ORANGE U GLAD
1998 Kawasaki Nomad bike --
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2010, 09:04 PM
snookwhaler's Avatar
Linesider
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Posts: 1,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkman View Post
The only problem with the Dodge is the truck they put around that wonderful engine. Of course, the 24v is a downgrade from the 12.
I agree to disagree... I have had the other 2 (GM and Ford brand new). When I bought mine in 2002 I went through numerous nightmares with Ford and Chevy. With the Chevy it was a never ending GM/Isuzu/Duramax "injector" problem. With the Ford it was the transmission. But the "24 valve" Dodge with the 6 speed does the job and does it easily. The other trucks (3500 dually's) struggled pulling the weight. Ford and GM had me waiting for my truck to be repaired and had me in numerous "waiting rooms".

I do agree about the trucks. I love the Ford interior. Plus the sheet metal on both GM and Ford was much better than the Dodge IMO... The Dodge sheet metal dings so easily? Weird... Not sure about the newer ones.

People are very uninformed about the early 24 valve Cummins. All you need to do is fix the lift pump problem, install a fuel pressure gauge and your done. I drive by my EGT gauge when pulling... But that is a different story. If you are refering to the "53 block" problem... Even some of the later 12 valvers were stuck with that mess. Research is involved with buying any new or used vehicle.

We all know the 12 Valve Cummins can make tons of power. But, it is not "where you need it when you need it" like the computer controlled 24 valve. Plus the fuel economy "sucks out loud" when pulling a heavy load. I do miss my 12 valve.... But, I'll stick with the 24 valve.

Edit: I almost forgot... That picture above is VERY misleading! Those pics are of the older GM and Ford rods. The newer Ford rod looks almost like the Cummins and the Duramax rod is even beefier in other locations. There is a newer picture somewhere. The one above is "really old".....

__________________
AJ

1985 300D (SOLD)

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page