Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:26 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
126s have guide rod mount bushings. There's no separate front subframe. I haven't been able to get JimmyL excited about the terminology, though
Thats funny. Where is he?

There have been a few times when I was calling around for these parts and the parts-guy would ask "front or rear?".... Did they mean the LCA?

Quote:
Questions about this procedure - can you confirm that you left the calipers on the rotors? Where did you disconnect the park brake cables?
left the calipers on

park-brake cables disconnected at the lever-arm (actuator) where they meet with the main 'pull-cable' from the cabin. About mid-body near the driveshaft pillow block.

__________________

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:31 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,851
126 front and rear suspension is very similar to 123. The main difference is the guide rods attach to brackets that have two bushings each -



A crossmember spans the brackets for no seeming purpose than to splash fluid draining from the torque converter.

124 (and 201 and 140 and...) have a more independent rear subframe that attaches at 4 points. The diff attaches to the subframe, not directly to the chassis -



Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:31 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
The subframe mounts are in this picture that jt20 posted



Fantastic pictures by the way jt20!

I especially like and approve of those nice chunky bits of wood - perfectly suited to this job. Well done.

Are you planning to do your own alignment? (I know you can't adjust anything on the back apart from ride height via the rubber "shims" or if you have those Gucci eccentric trailing arm bushings that fastlane sells but it would be nice to know if the rear wheels are straight in line with the front ones)
Ahh, that takes the kink out of my neck!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:34 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
124 (and 201 and 140 and...) have a more independent rear subframe that attaches at 4 points. The diff attaches to the subframe, not directly to the chassis.

Sixto
87 300D
Is it an improvement for the newer models or just a change?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:38 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580


I've been watching this thread since it started.

It is very interesting, very helpful and a lot of fun.

Great job guys.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:42 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
126 front and rear suspension is very similar to 123. The main difference is the guide rods attach to brackets that have two bushings each -

A crossmember spans the brackets for no seeming purpose than to splash fluid draining from the torque converter.

124 (and 201 and 140 and...) have a more independent rear subframe that attaches at 4 points. The diff attaches to the subframe, not directly to the chassis -

As always, thank you for informing. This is an excellent way to see how car design has developed over the years.




SJH: I like to leave the pictures all contorted for the viewer so you get the full experience of just how painful and agonizing it is to work on exposed aggregate (ask Charlie's knees.).
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:57 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt20 View Post
As always, thank you for informing. This is an excellent way to see how car design has developed over the years.




SJH: I like to leave the pictures all contorted for the viewer so you get the full experience of just how painful and agonizing it is to work on exposed aggregate (ask Charlie's knees.).
jt20

I defer to those who have blazed the trail.

I've just spent some time under my 124 and was trying to visualize what was in your picture. Ultimately I cheated.

So I take it the newer design is an improvement. I think we can agree, even with the great daimler benz, the passage of time does not always lead to improvements.

Great thread.

I'll be doing this within a year so it helps.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:00 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
Is it an improvement for the newer models or just a change?
If you appreciate more precise handling then it's an improvement -

http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=300339

I appreciate the softer ride of the 140. I don't know if that's a product of or facilitated by the 5-link architecture.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:12 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,851
From experience, simple swing axles are dangerous, particularly a V8 W109 I don't know how 6.3s stay on anything less than a straight road. I got into some hairy situations with a 300SEL 3.5. Eugen Boehringer should have a driving school. I've never pushed a 116 so I don't know how surefooted it feels. A 126 rolls so much that I let up before the tires and suspension quit. A 140 is surprisingly nimble for its size and heft but I don't know if it's actually quicker around turns than a 126. A 124 blows away the heavyweights in turns

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:21 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
If you appreciate more precise handling then it's an improvement -

http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=300339

I appreciate the softer ride of the 140. I don't know if that's a product of or facilitated by the 5-link architecture.

Sixto
87 300D
Every S-class I've driven I thought was spectacular and then I got in my E-class to go home and knew that I was in my car. I prefer a tighter suspension, quicker response, etc.

Maybe it goes back to my early days when I 'bonded' with my Austin Healy Sprite.

I've had my w124 ('90) for a year. I bought it 10 days before going into the hospital after saying goodbye to the w210. The seller, advertised here, stated it was completely maintained. Of course I've spent the year just starting to do what needs to be done.

There is quite a bit of 'lash' throughout the suspension. I think I've got most of it out of the drive train (motor mounts, transmission mounts, flex disks, carrier bearing and U-joint - remember seller stating car was completely maintained ) but I've not started on the suspension.

So I've not experienced a tight w124 and am wondering what it is suppose to be like.

In fact I'd say so far that my old w123 felt every bit as tight on the road as this w124 and in some ways was better.

I'm hopin' that with more work I'll find there are capabilities with this coach that I have yet to experience.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:24 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
... facilitated by the 5-link architecture.

Sixto
87 300D
Is that the terminology to describe the subframe architecture for the w124 and later models?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:33 AM
ashedd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
A 124 blows away the heavyweights in turns

Sixto
87 300D
Gawd, a 124 is like an anorexic tween on Ritalin compared to the "heavies". And the 300D takes the cake for crackhead like reflexes.

The 400E doesn't have that spring in the step that the 6's do, but it more than makes up for it with brute force.

Stuff a 5spd in there and it's even more fun
__________________
08 R320 CDI current

Past
95 E420
87 300D Turbo 5spd
90 300TE
83 300SD
85 300TD
92 400E
85 190D

Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:38 AM
ashedd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
jt20



So I take it the newer design is an improvement.
IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT

Everyone knows the 124 is like the Starship Enterprise compared to 123/126, which shares like everything, lol
__________________
08 R320 CDI current

Past
95 E420
87 300D Turbo 5spd
90 300TE
83 300SD
85 300TD
92 400E
85 190D

Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-06-2011, 02:47 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjh View Post
Is that the terminology to describe the subframe architecture for the w124 and later models?
I heard it called that in some marketing literature when the 201 was introduced.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-06-2011, 03:11 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
I heard it called that in some marketing literature when the 201 was introduced.

Sixto
87 300D
I'm seen the term used here. I wasn't sure how it was applied. Thanks.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page