Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-06-2012, 05:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
cold air intake?

HEY. i just wanted to ask if anyone could tell me if an air cleaner system out of a toyota camery (90's) would flow enough air for 300d turbo 83
__________________
what a day
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-2012, 05:50 PM
is thinning the herd
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 3,339
A cold air won't add any power on one of these cars. It makes the turbo louder, but you won't really see any power.
__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
well i just want to get it as fuel efficient as possible even if you can't see an improvement at all
__________________
what a day
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:21 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
well i just want to get it as fuel efficient as possible even if you can't see an improvement at all
polish the car & run skinny tires with plenty of pressure will do more to improve fuel consumption = efficiency.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-2012, 02:09 AM
is thinning the herd
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
well i just want to get it as fuel efficient as possible even if you can't see an improvement at all
They don't get 35mpg if that's what you've read.
__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2013, 09:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph on the highway on a cool morning. Boost was reading around 4-5 psi. I believe that if one really tried they could get 35mpg. I am an opportunist. I have this car now, so I will do my best with it. I know a lot of you gentlemen may think that I am stupid and ignorant, but I am doing what I want. My goal is to get 40 mpg highway with my car and I will achieve my goal. Wish me luck for those of you who are like me and for those of you that are not like me...wish me luck anyways(: thanks.
__________________
what a day
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2013, 10:20 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph on the highway on a cool morning. Boost was reading around 4-5 psi. I believe that if one really tried they could get 35mpg. I am an opportunist. I have this car now, so I will do my best with it. I know a lot of you gentlemen may think that I am stupid and ignorant, but I am doing what I want. My goal is to get 40 mpg highway with my car and I will achieve my goal. Wish me luck for those of you who are like me and for those of you that are not like me...wish me luck anyways(: thanks.
There is no way you are getting 33 MPG's at 75 mph in that car. The gearing of the W123 will provide excellent fuel economy at 55 MPH, anything above 60 and the work the engine has to do increases exponentially.

Share your methods and procedures because I don't believe it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2013, 12:37 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph on the highway on a cool morning. Boost was reading around 4-5 psi. I believe that if one really tried they could get 35mpg. I am an opportunist. I have this car now, so I will do my best with it. I know a lot of you gentlemen may think that I am stupid and ignorant, but I am doing what I want. My goal is to get 40 mpg highway with my car and I will achieve my goal. Wish me luck for those of you who are like me and for those of you that are not like me...wish me luck anyways(: thanks.
I think your speedometer/odometer isn't working.

A 300D can barely get much over 30 going 55mph on flat ground with no wind. 75mph will give approx 23-25mpg.

You will not achieve your goal, math and physics will make sure for you.

Even my smaller, lighter, more aerodynamic, more advanced engine, far less powerful 190d 2.2 (73 horsepower) can barely break 36mpg at 75mph on a good day. I even have a lower ratio differential.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2013, 01:32 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 57,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph on the highway on a cool morning. Boost was reading around 4-5 psi. I believe that if one really tried they could get 35mpg. I am an opportunist. I have this car now, so I will do my best with it. I know a lot of you gentlemen may think that I am stupid and ignorant, but I am doing what I want. My goal is to get 40 mpg highway with my car and I will achieve my goal. Wish me luck for those of you who are like me and for those of you that are not like me...wish me luck anyways(: thanks.
Concerning the Car weight; with gassers back in the 1970s they were saying if you could get rid of 400 pounds of weight off sprung weight you could save one Mile per Gallon.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-07-2013, 04:42 AM
cho's Avatar
cho cho is offline
diesel power
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post

I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph.

same (rebuilt) engine, in 1 inch lower car with better aerodynamics (w126 coupe)
30kg less curb weight...and I can only dream about 33 mpg.

@75mph (my) best case scenario is 26 mpg.

I have factory sprintfilter cold air,and I have not see any power increase.


cheers
ChO


.
__________________
w126 500SEC gen II euro, powered by OM617 turbo stolen from 84 300SD 2.88 diff,EGR blinded
next wish/project: w114 coupe OM603 powered
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-07-2013, 05:55 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benz Kid View Post
I got 33.1 with avg speed of 75 mph on the highway on a cool morning. Boost was reading around 4-5 psi. I believe that if one really tried they could get 35mpg. I am an opportunist. I have this car now, so I will do my best with it. I know a lot of you gentlemen may think that I am stupid and ignorant, but I am doing what I want. My goal is to get 40 mpg highway with my car and I will achieve my goal. Wish me luck for those of you who are like me and for those of you that are not like me...wish me luck anyways(: thanks.
What have you done to your car to get this?

this claim is very much outside of the norm for the vehicle, so Please post what you have done to get this.

anybody can get 30+mpg out of the vehicle if the trip is all downhill, with a tail wind, highway all tank long, and no stops between fillups.

the trick is averaging above 25mpg from tank to tank. accurate fills of the tank, burping out all the air, (why is it SOOOO hard to get the tank full to the brim on these cars???) the last 2 gallons or more take FOREVER to burp out the foam!

the problem is the car's designed in the early 70's/late 60's before aero was factored in. the flat nose, and bulbous bumper with high front and rough underbody do not promote efficient speeds above 60mph. add in the heavy automatic transmission, without any lockup the heat and slippage add up.

aero up the front end, and all panels, and the wheels/tires, and the underbody, and lighten up the load, carbon fiber all the skins, change the rear end ratio, get a smaller fuel tank, plastic race style, and swap in a 5 or 6 speed overdrive manual transmission, and you could see 40... or more even I suppose...
but then it's not a 123 sedan anymore...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:17 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Given the engine size of the camery & it being a gasser, it is unlikely to be an ideal selection. In theory cold air may let you tweak an extra lb or 2 from the turbo before the EGT gets too high. It is really just a waist of time. Put an intercooler on if you want to run higher boost.
You should be asking this stuff in the performance sub forum !
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:56 PM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,018
if you are searching for economy, aerodynamics is the key. the stock intake is far less restrictive that the car can use. tweaks to the alda, and the timing of the IP, along with perfect balance on the injectors, and delivery valves will net you the most economy.
reducing weight in the car, perfecting the shifting, and getting a manual trans.
moon hubcaps, air dams, spoiler/wing...
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:04 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
The stock intake on the 617 pulls in fresh cold air from the gap between te radiator support and hood. Can't get any colder for ya.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:09 PM
Zacharias's Avatar
Not so amused
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Quebec
Posts: 4,025
Quote:
well i just want to get it as fuel efficient as possible even if you can't see an improvement at all
Sure, but wouldn't it be a better idea to measure your fuel economy on a tankful or two, then come back and ask whether what you are getting is normal or not, and if the forum members have ideas on how it can be improved (assuming it isn't up to par)?
__________________


Mac
2002 e320 4matic estate│1985 300d│1980 300td
Previous: 1979 & 1982 & 1983 300sd │ 1982 240d

“Let's take a drive into the middle of nowhere with a packet of Marlboro lights and talk about our lives.” ― Joseph Heller, Catch-22
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page