|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-01-2001, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2002 fuel economy - why is it different?
For the 2002 ML320, the fuel economy is listed as 15/19, while for all the previous models, it was 17/21. I pointed this out to a salesman at the dealer, and he looked at me as if I was from Mars (obviously he hadn't even noticed it).
My question - The engine is the same, the transmission is the same, then why is the 2002 ML listed with lower economy figures? Probably the 2002 and previous model years owners could resolve this by posting the mileage that they ACTUALLY get out of their MLs. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fuel economy 300SDL | bhatt | Tech Help | 1 | 06-25-2004 12:24 PM |
| I have info on symptoms/diagnosis of a failing/failed Fuel Pressure Regulator! | azhari | Tech Help | 0 | 12-14-2003 11:23 AM |
| Best diesel fuel stations? Cetane levels. Premium diesel. (long) | BoostnBenz | Diesel Discussion | 19 | 07-13-2003 01:18 AM |
| 300d vs. 300sd fuel economy | apsharp | Diesel Discussion | 4 | 11-20-2001 09:34 AM |
| 230E fuel economy | us6111@ubaya.ac.id | Tech Help | 1 | 07-26-1999 11:39 PM |
Threaded Mode
