In the modern world, have these guys come up with anything original? I mean, does it not scare anyone here that the supposedly "white-hot emerging economy" is full of copyright infringements and fakes? As hot as the chinese economy is and as quickly as many foreign companies have rushed in to 'cash in' on this economy, I would be very weary of anything from china. Think about it, they now make fake jet engine parts! Think about that on your next family vacation.

Read on....

SHANGHAI (AFP) - Global coffee giant Starbucks has won a two-year copyright battle against Xingbake, a Chinese chain it claimed had copied the US company's logo and name.


A Shanghai court ordered Shanghai Xingbake Coffee Co. to pay 500,000 yuan (62,500 dollars) in damages after it judged the company had infringed upon the Seattle-based group's trademark, the China Daily reported.

Starbucks, which has 8,700 retail outlets worldwide and about 300 on the Chinese mainland, as well as in Hong Kong and Taiwan, alleged that "Xingbake" sounded phonetically similar to the pronounciation of "Starbucks" in Chinese.

"Xing" means star in Chinese and "bake" somewhat sounds like bucks, making it a popular name for the local chain, which has 38 outlets in Shanghai.

Xingbake's green and white logo is also very similar to the Starbucks design.

The Chinese company officially registered its name in January 2000, before Starbucks opened its first store in Shanghai but after the US group opened its first shop in China -- in Beijing -- in 1999.

Starbucks sued Xingbake in December 2003.

Like many similar copyright disputes in China, Xingbake claimed it never violated the Starbucks trademark or copied the design of the logo.

However Lu Guoqiang, chief judge in the case at the Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court, found that Xingbake did translate to Starbucks in Chinese.

The court ruled Saturday that Starbucks, named after the character in the classic 19th century American novel Moby Dick, was entitled to use the name in English and Chinese, as well as have sole use to the design of its logo.

Meanwhile, high-end British apparel maker Alfred Dunhill has won a separate copyright suit against the Beijing Wangshi Baili Commercial Co., the China Daily reported.

The Beijing High People's Court said a department store in Beijing run by Wangshi had been unlawfully selling wallets, belts and ties with Dunhill's name on them.

The court ordered the Chinese department store to pay a 50,000 yuan fine.

Despite repeated pledges by Beijing to stamp out trademark infringement, rampant violations are an increasingly bitter source of friction between China and the European Union and the United States, its two largest trading partners.

The ease with which clothing and apparel designs can be filched make the industry the most commonly targeted by copycats but similar abuses occur in China across a wide range of businesses.

Over half of the more than 100 million seized counterfeit articles entering Europe in 2004 originated in China, including fake medications, food, cigarettes and even Rolls Royce aircraft engine parts, according to the EU.

Pirated movies and music are also available across China for a fraction of the genuine articles' selling price.

General Motors of the United States, Japan's Honda, French sports apparel maker Lacoste and cognac maker Moet Hennessy have all been involved in trademark suits in China.

__________________
Jennifer
90 350sdl

i wonder why we do so much business with them if they refuse to "play fair."

i now try to avoid buying chinese made items. i make sure to look. they are taking manufacturing jobs away from working class people here too.

of course its the relentless persuit of profits that is, but we wont split hairs.

also, the chinese govt is one of the few that still does business with the zimbabwean govt, which is a despotic machiavellian thing all unto its own, and since im from there, no go on china.

__________________
'O=00=O'
bmw 2002.
long live the legend

So after 3 years of litigation Starbucks got $62,500 and Dunhill got $6,500. All I can say is thank god for the Chinese legal system and the way they keep a reign on those outrages verdicts.

It's China...those were "knock-off" settlement amounts...cheaper than the authentic ones...

__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle
2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car
2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver
2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car