Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 04-11-2006, 01:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benzadmiral
It should be based on NET, not gross. How can you use money you don't have (because The State took it away before you ever saw your check)?

One-fourth of take-home pay in a month -- one week's earnings -- is all you should ever have to spend on housing. The 31 and 46% figures are insane. No wonder everybody in America is in debt up to his eyebrows.
You can rewrite the current FNMA guidelines anytime you wish.

I'm simply citing the current practices........and MM has shown you that they are more liberal than my statements.

Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 04-11-2006, 01:55 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
You can rewrite the current FNMA guidelines anytime you wish.

I'm simply citing the current practices........and MM has shown you that they are more liberal than my statements.
To be honest I cannot think of a single lender that is using the 28% PITI ration today. not one.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 04-11-2006, 01:57 PM
Benzadmiral's Avatar
Chief Enforcement Agent
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 340
Oh, I know they're the current practices.

Doesn't make 'em right, or sensible.

The old rule-of-thumb was 25% of take-home pay. It worked beautifully for generations, and allowed people to actually save money as well as have a house, a car, food, and a few luxuries.

If Americans are crazy enough to ignore that . . . well, I just shake my head and turn away.
__________________
* *
-- Paul W. (The Benzadmiral)
('03 Buick Park Avenue, charcoal/cream)
Formerly:
'97 C230, smoke silver/parchment; '86 420SEL, anthracite/light grey; '84 280CE (W123), dark blue/palomino
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 04-11-2006, 02:02 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benzadmiral
Oh, I know they're the current practices.

Doesn't make 'em right, or sensible.

The old rule-of-thumb was 25% of take-home pay. It worked beautifully for generations, and allowed people to actually save money as well as have a house, a car, food, and a few luxuries.

If Americans are crazy enough to ignore that . . . well, I just shake my head and turn away.
Actually, it does make some sense to stretch yourself to the limit to purchase the first hours. Yes, you'll be "house poor", but attempting to save more money for a down payment, while the housing prices continue to climb, is not the best use of your money for the long haul.

Once you purchase the house, the costs for the mortgage are fixed as of that date. Therefore, in future dollars, the cost of the housing declines.

In your scenario, the individual would be a renter forever.......and still be over your self imposed limits.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 04-11-2006, 02:35 PM
Benzadmiral's Avatar
Chief Enforcement Agent
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
Actually, it does make some sense to stretch yourself to the limit to purchase the first hours. Yes, you'll be "house poor", but attempting to save more money for a down payment, while the housing prices continue to climb, is not the best use of your money for the long haul.

Once you purchase the house, the costs for the mortgage are fixed as of that date. Therefore, in future dollars, the cost of the housing declines.

In your scenario, the individual would be a renter forever.......and still be over your self imposed limits.
Oh, sure, you could stretch for your house payment, say to 26 or 27% -- but again, of NET, not gross. If you overextend, and then your job goes overseas and you hit one or more of those big bad patches we all get, you could lose the house. There goes all your money, the same as if you rented.

My point is not that the housing market is allowing such insane practices. They're greedy and never think of anything beyond the next quarter; of course they'd do anything to gulp down some more cash. I'm just amazed at the stupidity/improvidence of people who fall for it. Just because the *limit* is 28% of gross, does that mean you *have* to go that high?

If house buyers had stayed sensible ("You want me to shell out *how much*?!? You're nuts!"), the lenders wouldn't have been able to pull this scam, and house and rental prices could have remained reasonable.
__________________
* *
-- Paul W. (The Benzadmiral)
('03 Buick Park Avenue, charcoal/cream)
Formerly:
'97 C230, smoke silver/parchment; '86 420SEL, anthracite/light grey; '84 280CE (W123), dark blue/palomino
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 04-11-2006, 02:54 PM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
31% of an hourly wage earners income is much different than a person making 250K a year, the person with the higher income still has plenty of money to live on unlike the persona that makes $50,000.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 04-11-2006, 03:05 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benzadmiral
My point is not that the housing market is allowing such insane practices. They're greedy and never think of anything beyond the next quarter; of course they'd do anything to gulp down some more cash. I'm just amazed at the stupidity/improvidence of people who fall for it. Just because the *limit* is 28% of gross, does that mean you *have* to go that high?
So, if you are currently a renter, and you see a house whereby your PITI is 34% of your gross income, and the house is suitable for you, and you have the down payment.......you're saying that you would not buy the house.......and wait until your available monthly net cash is 4X the monthly housing cost??

If so........you'll be renting for the rest of your life.......and, you do realize that rents continue to climb......where a P & I payment is fixed?

Your logic makes no sense for a first time homebuyer.......in fact........there would be NO first time homebuyers with your scenario unless real estate values crashed.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 04-11-2006, 03:43 PM
Benzadmiral's Avatar
Chief Enforcement Agent
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 340
Down payment?

Hmph. Any house I've looked at in years has been so overpriced that a big enough down payment to bring its note down from the stratosphere would be enough to buy a small condo.

Sure, I could put myself in desperate hock to the finance company . . . but I happen to like things like electricity, food, and gas for my car. Cat food doesn't appeal to me.

And how are your costs "fixed"? Property taxes go up; repairs go up; there's insurance, power, gas, water and sewer, flood insurance . . . You need to leave some headroom. One-third of NET income is one thing, but one-third of GROSS is using money you don't even have! It's insane! Sure, as MedMech pointed out, if you make $250K a year, you can pay even half your income (crazy as that is), because you still have plenty more to live on and save. But at $35K, you don't have much margin for error.

Understand, I'm not arguing against buying a house. I'm arguing in favor of being sensible about it. My "logic" is the simple logic of the checkbook. If you spend more than you make, you're in trouble. Governments don't have to live like that. We do.

If housing prices crash back down to reasonable levels, it might give the average Joe a chance.
__________________
* *
-- Paul W. (The Benzadmiral)
('03 Buick Park Avenue, charcoal/cream)
Formerly:
'97 C230, smoke silver/parchment; '86 420SEL, anthracite/light grey; '84 280CE (W123), dark blue/palomino
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 04-11-2006, 05:18 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
I was talking to a mortgage broker a couple of weeks ago. She says a lot of the loans she does now are 100%. PMI is also a thing of the past. 80/20 loans take care of that.

I come from the school of thought to finance as much as possible for a house.

For example why put $50k down on a $200k house when you can use the banks $200k to buy the house, and use your $50k to make you more money?

When I'm older like over 50 I'll be looking to pay off the house.

The reason people stretch so much at least in my area is that average houses are $300k-$600k. So if you make say $40k-$50k a year its gonna be a bit of work.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 04-11-2006, 05:48 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
I was talking to a mortgage broker a couple of weeks ago. She says a lot of the loans she does now are 100%.
How?
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 04-11-2006, 06:08 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
What do you mean?
100% no income varification loans are real common. If your FICO score is good you would be amazed at how fast and easy it is to buy a $300k primary residence.

Want her number? She is in Stratford CT seems to know her stuff. I'm cetainly going to offer her services to my clients.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 04-11-2006, 07:07 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy
What do you mean?
100% no income varification loans are real common. If your FICO score is good you would be amazed at how fast and easy it is to buy a $300k primary residence.

Want her number? She is in Stratford CT seems to know her stuff. I'm cetainly going to offer her services to my clients.
If you can borrow 100% of the contract price on a new purchase, without income verification, and with an appraisal that just meets the contract price, you bet I want her number.

I want to see how she manages this one.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 04-11-2006, 07:14 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
PM's on its way.
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 04-11-2006, 07:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 992
#

send me the number too... i need another mortage...

Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 04-12-2006, 12:49 AM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
If you can borrow 100% of the contract price on a new purchase, without income verification, and with an appraisal that just meets the contract price, you bet I want her number.

I want to see how she manages this one.
It's called a flex 100, 80/20 and 100 other names.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page