Terrorist in Canada,,,,,,,but why? - Page 6 - PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

mgburg · #76 06-11-2006, 10:59 PM

For all you fair-haired liberals, east, west, north and south of any border...

On 9-11, 2001, the US got punched in the eye by 19 idiots that are now maggot-meat history and (I truly believe) their souls are not being "satisfied" by 72 virgins, but are waiting for the "final trumpet" to call them to their just desserts-a fire-and-brimstone hell for all eternity.

Even though our (US) government had intelligence on these clowns and due to typical Government ineptitude, they somehow managed to pull it off, the fact remains that the US, Canada, Britain and the rest of the CIVILIZED world is striking back at the b*****ds. Long may we rain death and dismemberment on the pig-****ers (PFs)!

Now, on to the P***ys that claim we need to be a kinder and gentler nation w/a feau-hammer.

First off, these PC-Pu**ys (PCPs) can't stand hearing, reading or seeing the truth w/their own ears and eyes. If their own mother was being gang-raped by a bunch of these PFs, they would run down the street and scream that the police need to do something, "But, don't hurt the bad guys...they're mis-understood-It's really someone else's fault they are acting like they are..."

I'd puke but what's left now is only bile. I'm tired of the PCPs screaming that "Bush started the war." or "We had it coming." That's PCP for "I'm nothing more than a big chickens**t and I don't have a bone in my body to stand up for what's right."

You will never be able to pin a PCP down on anything that requires a solid foundation of truth, understanding and last, but not least, morality. The PC will say that everyone is entitled to "do their own thing" (Hippy-speak for, "I'm too damn lazy to work. Where's the free meal coming from today?") but yet they are forgetting the most important part of their own convoluted logic...Their rights should end where their neighbor's nose begins.

The PCPs are great for saying how we should all drive punny little Volks-mobiles with a 150-mile power radius, but their own PC-spokespeople continue to drive gas-guzzeling, or diesel-powered, SUVs.

The PCPs scream how the spotted-owl is practically wiped out, yet the PCs continue to build their dream-homes high on hill-sides overlooking the little people, from timber harvested from some other location.

The PCP professors scream how the government is corrupted by big business and special interests, but somehow those very same PCP professors still manage to take home a paycheck that's 3-5 times the level of the average blue-collar worker and their jobs are government-protected and paid for.

The PCPs scream how unfair the labor practices of private industries are subjecting the common-man to low wages and minimal insurance (if any at all) but they enforce hiring practices (at government expense) that keep highly-qualified people from working at their own place of employment.

The only reason a liberal is still able to be a liberal is because it's still illegal to shoot them. And that's because a conservative (Despite what he REALLY wants to do...) will still follow the law.

That's why conservatives RESPECT the immigration laws.

That's why conservatives cringe every time a "compassionate judge" lets a criminal loose because an officer didn't read the perp his rights.

And, if you're ever at a meeting where a conservative (God forbid!) has a chance to speak out on an issue, you can be guaranteed that the "PCP" group will feel it's their right to shout him down. But be aware of this fact. Unless the conservative has been verbally (and sometimes physically) attacked, the conservative will ALWAYS respect the PCPs right to voice his oppinion, whether the conservative agrees with it or not.

The difference, really, between a Democrat (PCP) and a Republican is this:

The Democrat only seeks to "fix" a problem for the moment, oblivious to the consequences of his actions and the effect it will have on everyone else later.

The Republican will thoughtfully think out the consequences of any action taken and should (but not always) take the least disruptive and appropriate action possible. The outcome will never be what everyone wants, but the circumstances, at that time, will be the best dictator of what action needs to be taken, for the betterment of all.

BURP!

peragro · #77 06-12-2006, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Padraig

Of course it would !, AND That's what it was [and still is].
What else would a rational, intelligent person, who thinks before they, open their 'Gob' [Gaelic for mouth] call it?

Not sure where you're going with this my Gaelic Friend, but if you haven't noticed there are a lot of folks in the US who are saying that both Iraq and Afghanistan are unilateral actions with nominal coalition support. Somehow this is different than Bosnia or Kosovo where these same folks laud the presence of "coalition forces". It's a strange world.

aklim · #78 06-12-2006, 10:22 AM

As far as politicians go, with reference to mgburg, they are human. That means they care for their own skin. Democrats do it and so do Republicans. They care about the next election and maybe the one after that if they are not ready to retire. Reps are NOT always right nor are Dems always wrong. They keep each other in check which is the best thing we can hope for. If either party runs the show, expect chaos.

Padraig · #79 06-12-2006, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by peragro

Not sure where you're going with this my Gaelic Friend, but if you haven't noticed there are a lot of folks in the US who are saying that both Iraq and Afghanistan are unilateral actions with nominal coalition support. Somehow this is different than Bosnia or Kosovo where these same folks laud the presence of "coalition forces". It's a strange world.

Yes, If they wish to 'split hairs' and use the word 'nominal', or coalition of the very few; otherwise 'unilateral' action is the key word in the present invasion of Iraq.

Previously, George's Daddy did it in 'Desert Storm' with some, or perhaps the only, justification:to protect oil supplies; and 'Goddam' Saddam wh seemed to have used unprovoked unilateral force to attack Kuwait deserved a thrashing

Your comparison of the latest unprovoked Iraq action to world intervention in Bosnia and Kosovo hardly rates, as the action then was to seemingly stop the massacre of a large minority ethnic population.

My reading of the Irag invasion and occupation is that many, many Americans - including those who applauded the initial action - want it to stop - NOW! and bring your boys and girls home without further harm.

No doubt in my mind that George W., would love to find an honourable way out of an unhonourable situation, but he's caught in the web of his own making.