Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-19-2007, 12:35 PM
Emmerich's Avatar
M-100's in Dallas
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 683
The most important part of that "oops" by NASA is now 5 of the 10 warmest years occurred before WWII, and 1934 was the hottest, not 1998. The global warming idiots swing that around as "proof" of their concept and their concept just fell apart (again).

The Canadian scientist who discovered the data error is the same guy who shot down the "hockey stick". The guy who created the hockey stick graph (which shows a recent upturn in temperature) generated the graph by computer model, which he would not release. The other scientist figured it out though and ran validation tests on the model. Basically what he found was that no matter what temperature data you input, you got a hockey stick out...turns out the original model had some really sloppy math in it.






Quote:
Originally Posted by waybomb View Post
I just read somewhere the other day that NASA has edited their climate data from the time period since 1980 because of errors in collection techniques. I believe the total temperature gain since then was off by 0.15C. That is a significant error if the total rise was alleged to be 0.5C.

And no, I wasn't thinking of mercedesshop OD when I read it, so I did not keep the link to post here.


__________________
MB-less
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-20-2007, 07:13 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by waybomb View Post
I just read somewhere the other day that NASA has edited their climate data from the time period since 1980 because of errors in collection techniques. I believe the total temperature gain since then was off by 0.15C. That is a significant error if the total rise was alleged to be 0.5C.

And no, I wasn't thinking of mercedesshop OD when I read it, so I did not keep the link to post here.
That wont be the last time, either.

NASA gets it's temp data radiometrically, not through more typical direct measurements. It's a relatively new technology they use and so, the knowledge of how to derive the temps is not as stable. Each successive correction will probably be by a decreasing amount, making all of the data more reliable.

How do these corrections affect global models? Models are developed and verified using real data. As real data increase in accuracy and density over the globe and through time, hopefully it will improve the the models reliability and predictability.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-20-2007, 12:47 PM
Mistress's Avatar
No crying in baseball
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a vortex
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by POS View Post
In my short 38 years on this planet, one constant is that scientists are dumbasses - they think they know the answers even when they have limited data, then they blurt out premature conclusions. The earth's systems are far to complex for them to figure out, and they won't admit it.
WHHHHAAAATTTTTTTTTT! Blasphemous.......now go to your room, your getting a whipping!

__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page