Bot, I'm sure you could coment on this, but I seem to remember that nature has a way of weeding and pruning animal (including human) populations regardless of our own activities. As far as producing more boys than girls goes, something like this ocurred after WWII, did it not. In that case so many men were killed in the war that there was a noticeable decline in the male population.

I think I read that somewhere, so it MUST be true. If I am remembering correctly more boys were born after the war, balancing the ratio.

If this is the case, then human efforts at practicing eugenics would probably be frustrated to the extent that they contradicted the requirements of nature. What say you?

__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles

In human populations, male births generally out-pace female births. Males have larger numbers of birth defects (including mental defects) and die younger than females.

If your memory is accurate concerning the sex ratio post WWII, I'd be curious as to the cause.

B

turtlewaxing.

__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL

^^^ What where they ..... eeewww!!!

I seem to remember a statistic that shows that the first child born to a couple where the age difference is larger than 5 years (the male being older) tend to be male. This would explain the higher number of males born after world wars where young men were killed in large numbers.
I just don't remember where I saw it.

Alex