I wouldn't buy a F$%&^ newspaper at an Exxon station... - Page 19 - PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

RichC · #**271** 02-17-2008, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst

Don't just complain, any fool can do that. Indicate where the logic is wrong.

B

Basically you said that it was OK to go to war on suspicion of evidence.
But it was not OK to do anything to Exxon on suspicion of evidence.

That is using the same logic in two opposite ways.

But I would still rather play the fool if you don't mind.

Botnst · #**272** 02-17-2008, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichC

Basically you said that it was OK to go to war on suspicion of evidence.
But it was not OK to do anything to Exxon on suspicion of evidence.

That is using the same logic in two opposite ways.

But I would still rather play the fool if you don't mind.

I'm just talking here, but to me, there's a difference between a war and a legal action.

B

Veggi2Fuel · #**273** 02-17-2008, 08:31 AM

Guys Guys remember you cant argue with right wing republicans that are poor and waiting for scraps. They are on some kind of spell defending the hoarders of the earth and steamrollers of death that are not Christians or believe in God. They say they do but they really don't.

What they believe in is Ronald Reagan, W, 41, 37, Rush, Vanity, and funny Levine.
please u right wing neo cons don't deny it.

aklim · #**274** 02-17-2008, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichC

Basically you said that it was OK to go to war on suspicion of evidence.

How are you defining suspicion of evidence? Many countries provided the evidence of materials that went in with shipping manifests and what not. He was supposed to account for it. He didn't and played shell games. What part of that is in dispute?

Botnst · #**275** 02-17-2008, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veggi2Fuel

Guys Guys remember you cant argue with right wing republicans that are poor and waiting for scraps. They are on some kind of spell defending the hoarders of the earth and steamrollers of death that are not Christians or believe in God. They say they do but they really don't.

What they believe in is Ronald Reagan, W, 41, 37, Rush, Vanity, and funny Levine.
please u right wing neo cons don't deny it.

Nuts are a vegetable, too.

Veggi2Fuel · #**276** 02-17-2008, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim

How are you defining suspicion of evidence? Many countries provided the evidence of materials that went in with shipping manifests and what not. He was supposed to account for it. He didn't and played shell games. What part of that is in dispute?

So for a game of shell's gives the right for the destruction of a country and the deaths of over a million people. I hope you are never harmed over a shell game, or for someone else's deeds.

Botnst · #**277** 02-17-2008, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veggi2Fuel

So for a game of shell's gives the right for the destruction of a country and the deaths of over a million people. I hope you are never harmed over a shell game, or for someone else's deeds.

On that we can agree.

Now if only murdering-bastard megalomaniacs would tell the truth, life would be sweet.

B

RichC · #**278** 02-17-2008, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst

I'm just talking here, but to me, there's a difference between a war and a legal action.

B

Yes,

And a war should be much harder to start than a legal action.

But you have argued the opposite direction.

Leave Exxon alone but Kill Iraq.

There is no way that makes sense !!

RichC · #**279** 02-17-2008, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst

On that we can agree.

Now if only murdering-bastard megalomaniacs would tell the truth, life would be sweet.

B

So we cannot have peace till all the murdering-bastard megalomaniacs
start telling the truth ????

Botnst · #**280** 02-17-2008, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichC

Yes,

1. And a war should be much harder to start than a legal action.

2. But you have argued the opposite direction.

3. Leave Exxon alone but Kill Iraq.

4. There is no way that makes sense !!

1. It was more difficult to engage in war. it took majority votes from both houses of Congress. You remember -- where some voted for it before they voted against it.

2. Factually incorrect.

3. I have no idea what that means.

4. No kidding, huh?

B

Botnst · #**281** 02-17-2008, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichC

So we cannot have peace till all the murdering-bastard megalomaniacs
start telling the truth ????

Yes!

aklim · #**282** 02-17-2008, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veggi2Fuel

So for a game of shell's gives the right for the destruction of a country and the deaths of over a million people. I hope you are never harmed over a shell game, or for someone else's deeds.

A million people didn't die because of the shell game. They died because of the insurgents in Iraq from other places. Why don't you ask them if a million people should die for their cause?

aklim · #**283** 02-17-2008, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichC

So we cannot have peace till all the murdering-bastard megalomaniacs
start telling the truth ????

Well, if it comes to bite us in the ass and kills us, I suppose our dead would be at peace.

Veggi2Fuel · #**284** 02-18-2008, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst

1. It was more difficult to engage in war. it took majority votes from both houses of Congress. You remember -- where some voted for it before they voted against it.

2. Factually incorrect.

3. I have no idea what that means.

4. No kidding, huh?

B

The vote was to look into war and for Afghanistan. Not to overthrow Iraq. The house and congress were bamboozled. Colin Powell showed drawings of trucks thought to have WMD's how does that guy sleep at night.

Botnst · #**285** 02-18-2008, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veggi2Fuel

The vote was to look into war and for Afghanistan. Not to overthrow Iraq. The house and congress were bamboozled. Colin Powell showed drawings of trucks thought to have WMD's how does that guy sleep at night.

Read the resolution. It clearly and unambiguously empowered the President to determine whether to force Iraq into compliance.

B