PaulC |
05-08-2008 12:46 PM |
Safety interlocks are not such a bad idea. Let's fade in to a summer evening in 1971 - young PaulC is cleaning the interior of a relative's 1969 Ford LTD hardtop, which was parked on a hill alongside his house. PaulC concludes cleaning and goes inside the house to catch a re-run of Hawaii Five-O. Soon DaddyC calls PaulC to the window: "Where's the Ford?" "I dunno." "Were you in the Ford today?" "Uh-huh, I was cleaning it". "Did you move the car at all?" (A fair question, as I had been driving cars on private property for about 4 years at this time.) "Nope" "Where's the car?" (Now my father pictured himself as the real-life iteration of Perry Mason, and a deft cross-examiner. My vision of him was that of a nascent Hamilton Burger, and even at 11, I usually batted .500 during these inquiries, but I digress.).
Anyway, we went outside whereupon I discovered that the LTD, even with the parking brake on, had drifted down the hill, through an intersection and tried to eat a U.S. mailbox with the rear bumper. I can only theorize that I had bumped the shift lever slightly while cleaning the car, and closing the driver's door as I alit the vehicle helped it into Reverse. The parking brake apparently delayed movement and immediate discovery and limited top speed to a crawl.
Now, if this car had even a rudimentary ignition switch/shifter interlock (alas, not featured on Fords until 1970), a U.S. mailbox would still be alive today, and I would have found out if Jack Lord got the bad guy.
|