Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2008, 10:09 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
You don't need a weatherman ...

A mighty wind
Jon Kelly22 Sep 08, 10:44 GMT
BBC


Think of Texas and you think of oil. I always did, anyway - Dallas has a lot to answer for. I was slightly disappointed on crossing the state border not to spot any cigar-chomping tycoons in Stetsons and cowboy boots. What I did see, however, might come as a surprise to those who associate George W Bush's backyard with black gold. The skyline, I noticed, was dotted with wind turbines. This didn't look like JR Ewing country to me.

Contrary to its gas-guzzling reputation, however, the Lone Star State can stake a claim to be wind power capital of America. Some 3% of its electricity already is generated in this way, a figure that is certain to rise as it pushes ahead with a massive programme of expansion. What's even more interesting about its status as a powerhouse for green energy is that it has been pioneered not by environmentalists, but by a very Texan energy baron. Up in Pampa, oil billionaire T Boone Pickens Jnr is spending $10bn building 2,700 wind turbines across 200,000 acres of panhandle. Pickens is a fervent Republican who funded the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth campaign, widely credited with securing Bush's re-election during the 2004 presidential campaign.

But I wanted to visit the real boomtown for wind power in Texas: Sweetwater, a small community of 11,000 which will have over 1,500 turbines spinning around its surrounding countryside by 2009. I went to see Robert and Nadene Petty, both 67, on the ranch bought by Robert's father in 1928. As well producing cattle, cotton and wheat, their family's 13,000 acres forms part of the Sweetwater wind farm. They're paid to host 40 turbines on their property, as part of a deal which has helped keep many farms in West Texas in business.

Robert was no touchy-feely eco-warrior but a typical Texan Republican who told me he didn't care for Barack Obama's "liberal Democratic ideas". Pump-jacks bobbed for oil across his land underneath the windmills. But he was proud that he was doing his bit to save the planet. "I reckon farmers and ranchers were the first environmentalists," he said. "It's our job to preserve the land."

There had been some local opposition, Nadene admitted, when the first turbines went up in 2006. But almost everyone in the area was now behind them, she said, because they were generating so much cash. "Plus, our cows love the windmills," she laughed. "They lie down in their shadows in a big long line."

I wandered into Sweetwater to see if I could find any opposition to the turbines. Not a single person I encountered had a word to say against them. Had I been back in Scotland, I knew, I would have encountered a very different reaction. One reason for this might be that wind has brought more than 1,000 much-needed jobs to this area.

I met 22-year-old Marina Ortega, who was studying to be a turbine technician at Texas State Technical College in Sweetwater. She told me that she hoped she had found herself steady employment for life.

"I wanted to take this course because wind power is the future," she said. "If you're looking for a career that will last you 20, 30 years, this looks a pretty safe bet."

It was starting to make sense to me now.

Before I left town, Sweetwater's mayor Greg Wortham - a former New York attorney who returned to Sweetwater to set up the West Texas Wind Energy Consortium - told me that Texans' natural pragmatism had convinced them that renewables were the way forward.

"People in Massachusetts and Vermont talk about green this and green that," he said. "But when it comes to actually building wind farms, they don't want to spoil their scenery. We just like to get things done. Because of the oil, people understand energy around here. If I could vote for T Boone Pickens and Al Gore on the same ticket, I would."

It's not a hook-up I would anticipate any time soon. But it sounds like it would be a winner in Texas.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-22-2008, 10:28 PM
POS's Avatar
POS POS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,506
3% generation of power for the state. I'm not against the turbines and I don't even think they're all that ugly, but we'd be better off with a nuke plant.
__________________
- Brian


1989 500SEL Euro
1966 250SE Cabriolet
1958 BMW Isetta 600
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-22-2008, 10:38 PM
Palangi's Avatar
L' Résistance
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Republique de Banana
Posts: 3,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by POS View Post
we'd be better off with a nuke plant.
Funny you should mention that......

http://www.star-telegram.com/business/story/921796.html
__________________
Palangi

2004 C240 Wagon 203.261 Baby Benz
2008 ML320 CDI Highway Cruiser
2006 Toyota Prius, Saving the Planet @ 48 mpg
2000 F-150, Destroying the Planet @ 20 mpg



TRUMP .......... WHITEHOUSE
HILLARY .........JAILHOUSE
BERNIE .......... NUTHOUSE
0BAMA .......... OUTHOUSE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2008, 11:35 PM
I miss my MBZ
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palangi View Post
Duke Energy is trying to do the same thing in the carolina's - another funny common point is that both companies are getting/have insurance against "the plant not being built". in DE's case, IIRC, the state of NC agreed to insure the plant for a couple billion (?) to reimburse Duke Energy if they were (at any point in the process) denied the ability to build a power plant.

I'm trying to think of another business where you find that kind of arrangement.

-John
__________________
2009 Kia Sedona
2009 Honda Odyssey EX-L
12006 Jetta Pumpe Duse
(insert Mercedes here)

Husband, Father, sometimes friend =)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2008, 07:32 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel View Post
Duke Energy is trying to do the same thing in the carolina's - another funny common point is that both companies are getting/have insurance against "the plant not being built". in DE's case, IIRC, the state of NC agreed to insure the plant for a couple billion (?) to reimburse Duke Energy if they were (at any point in the process) denied the ability to build a power plant.

I'm trying to think of another business where you find that kind of arrangement.

-John
Investment Banking.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page