Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-21-2009, 07:38 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Take those AIG bonuses and put them toward Bio-D infrastructure?

I think once we get the infrastructure in place, then bio fuels will be much more competitive. If we levy a(nother) gasoline tax to help pay for the bio refineries, is that much different than the price of gas going up to rebuild the refineries damaged by Katrina?
Yes.

The gov takes about 60% overhead (IIRC) from taxes to run itself, never mind achieving what the legislation requires.

I'm an investor. I like it when my investments make a profit. Given a choice between artificially inflating prices with a huge overhead accruing to an expanded bureaucracy or allowing the price to be dictated by supply and demand and profits accruing to private investors, ...

I'll take the investor for 10 Trillion, Alex.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:17 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
Good. Then they have to explain why they are raising the taxes. Currently, they can move too much money around and raise taxes insidiously so you won't notice.

Consumption tax, sales tax, they are both very insidious. How much did you pay last year in sales tax? I have no idea, but I know exactly how much I paid in income tax.

I agree that any additional revenue raised for a specific purpose, any purpose, is going to get pilfered and raided by every congressman who can get his/her greedy little paws on it.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim
Goes to the general purse to be spent in ways unimaginable. Just like all other money. Best not let them have any more.
Until you get government borrowing under control, it doesn't matter how much tax revenue they get from us. They will spend whatever they deem appropriate. So "starving the beast" is a myth as long as the borrowing has no reasonable limits.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Put a rebate it. Voila.
It's easier to just not tax the things you want a rebate on, maybe things like food. But the biggest problem is that to fund the needs of the govt as is the sales tax would have to be enormous and there's no way people would approve of it and it would hurt the consumer economy that we have today.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-21-2009, 08:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
A service economy. We can't create wealth by mowing eachothers lawns.
Sure we can. Securitize the lawn mowing with AAA-rated credit default swaps and encourage investors to pour money into it by giving them huge tax cuts. Works like a charm.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:28 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Consumption tax, sales tax, they are both very insidious. How much did you pay last year in sales tax? I have no idea, but I know exactly how much I paid in income tax.

I agree that any additional revenue raised for a specific purpose, any purpose, is going to get pilfered and raided by every congressman who can get his/her greedy little paws on it.
There is sales tax, tax on the interest you earned, capitals gains tax, etc, etc. There are way too many to keep track of. You know how much you paid in income tax but with all the state tax, county tax, etc, etc, how do you know the totals? Way too many to keep track of. When you see the total come up and the tax on the receipt, you will know how much is being taxed and since that is the only form, it is easy to keep track of. Here is another way. Assuming the tax is 10% and I know that last year I wrote out $1100 in checks. I know I bought $1000 of stuff and paid $100 in taxes. The math is pretty simple.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:33 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Until you get government borrowing under control, it doesn't matter how much tax revenue they get from us. They will spend whatever they deem appropriate. So "starving the beast" is a myth as long as the borrowing has no reasonable limits.
I would disagree with that. Sure we need to stop the borrowing, period. However it is a 2 pronged approach. You need to stop borrowing an control the revenue. Control the tax alone won't cut it but adding the borrowing control will. But until we get borrowing under control, why do we want to feed the beast AND have borrowing out of control? IOW, why have 2 things out of whack as opposed to 1?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:36 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
But the biggest problem is that to fund the needs of the govt as is the sales tax would have to be enormous and there's no way people would approve of it

and it would hurt the consumer economy that we have today.
And maybe instead of having the various taxes we pay nickle and dime us to death and having one huge tax where the govt has to be more cautious when it tries to raise it might just work out better. Now instead of cutting here and pushing that into a different set of books so you don't notice it, they have to increase the tax from say 35% to 38% and they will have people breathing down their necks.

Yesterday, when we were making money, that was not the time. Today when we are losing money, it isn't the time. When is it the time?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-21-2009, 11:55 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
It's easier to just not tax the things you want a rebate on, maybe things like food. But the biggest problem is that to fund the needs of the govt as is the sales tax would have to be enormous and there's no way people would approve of it and it would hurt the consumer economy that we have today.
It's easier to let people take responsibility for their own lives. But we live in a culture that doesn't allow that.

The cumulative total of taxes is exactly as you describe it: HUGE. I prefer an honest tax policy in which the taxpayers know exactly how much they are taxed nd on whom to place the blame. Put a tax on every bleeding transaction in America, no deductions. Listen to the swine in DC squeal.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-22-2009, 01:12 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
Put a tax on every bleeding transaction in America, no deductions. Listen to the swine in DC squeal.
Balanced, no doubt, by the silence from Warren Buffet claiming he pays a lower percentage than his workers.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-22-2009, 02:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
It's easier to let people take responsibility for their own lives. But we live in a culture that doesn't allow that.

The cumulative total of taxes is exactly as you describe it: HUGE. I prefer an honest tax policy in which the taxpayers know exactly how much they are taxed nd on whom to place the blame. Put a tax on every bleeding transaction in America, no deductions. Listen to the swine in DC squeal.
Not knowing how much tax we are paying isn't the problem. Anyone who files their taxes knows exactly how much taxes they're paying. My main objection is the number of different taxes and the huge complexity of the tax code and its numerous loopholes. A simple federal sales tax with no tax filing would indeed be nice.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-22-2009, 02:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by aklim View Post
I would disagree with that. Sure we need to stop the borrowing, period. However it is a 2 pronged approach. You need to stop borrowing an control the revenue. Control the tax alone won't cut it but adding the borrowing control will. But until we get borrowing under control, why do we want to feed the beast AND have borrowing out of control? IOW, why have 2 things out of whack as opposed to 1?
It's not that simple. The problem with borrowing is the interest the taxpayers pay, frequently accompanied by currency devaluation. So giving the govt the money it wants to spend is not necessarily worse than forcing it to borrow. In fact I'd argue it's better. But then again, it might make the spending get even more out of control. The key is to control spending, but not through tax revenue starvation. It should be done through proper legislation.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-22-2009, 06:23 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
It's not that simple. The problem with borrowing is the interest the taxpayers pay, frequently accompanied by currency devaluation. So giving the govt the money it wants to spend is not necessarily worse than forcing it to borrow. In fact I'd argue it's better. But then again, it might make the spending get even more out of control.

The key is to control spending, but not through tax revenue starvation. It should be done through proper legislation.
In the short term, yes, you are right. It is better to let the govt have the money than to borrow. OTOH, I look at it like Y2K. Tons of time to fix it but nobody wanted to take the steps necessary at that time. When they are finally forced, they do it.

But if they won't do it, all you are doing is letting it go on longer. Much like Y2K. Nobody wanted to do it in 91 because it would go against their budget and they could push it off later. After all, they might not be there when it needed to be done. However, once say 98 came along, they were forced to fix it. Revenue starvation would be like the clock ticking with Y2K coming around the corner. In 91 they could ignore it. In 98, fix it or else. If not, what would induce them to fix it? Getting spending under control means cuts. You don't buy votes by cutting goodies. They follow the law of inertia. As long as the least resistive path is to borrow and spend, why would they change it? Because it is good for us all? How does that help their career? Politicians on both sides of the aisle are bidding on your vote by offering more than the other guy.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:27 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Not knowing how much tax we are paying isn't the problem. Anyone who files their taxes knows exactly how much taxes they're paying. My main objection is the number of different taxes and the huge complexity of the tax code and its numerous loopholes. A simple federal sales tax with no tax filing would indeed be nice.
Anybody who thinks that their income tax filing is all the taxes they pay should broaden their scope.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-22-2009, 07:35 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Not knowing how much tax we are paying isn't the problem. Anyone who files their taxes knows exactly how much taxes they're paying. My main objection is the number of different taxes and the huge complexity of the tax code and its numerous loopholes. A simple federal sales tax with no tax filing would indeed be nice.
Do you know how much you paid in taxes? Sure you know what you paid the IRS. What did you pay in state, county, city, street, dog catcher tax, etc, etc tax? What about your sales tax? You earn money and get taxed. Buy something and also get taxed. With all that complexity, how many know how much they paid in taxes altogether? Then we get the loopholes you talked about. All this is great for obfuscation. $100 here, $20, there, $5, here and pretty soon you have a huge chunk of money but because it is so confusing and small, you fail to notice it. OTOH, if we had one tax and we bumped it up even 1%, you will hear of it and see it. Like I said, total up all your purchases and use the simple formulas and you figure out what your total taxes are. Also when you give me a tax cut, I can see it. There is no adding of this tax and subtracting from that.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page