O'Reilly likes to go on about how Tiller is aborting fetuses from 10 and 11 year old girls and thus protecting rapists. How is the rapist being protected? Will forcing a girl at that age to deliver a child and suffer the very likely physical damage somehow bring the slime that inpregnated her to justice?

Somebody help me out here. If those around such a child did not notice that she was preggers and take steps to apprehend the culprit long before she was brought to Tiller, I'm at a loss to see how her giving birth to a child who will clearly not have a viable mother will somehow make things right.

Are rightie pro-lifers aware of what happens to underage girls who give birth long before their bodies are ready for it?

__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K

I don't think they care, as long as they can prevent abortion and thus appease their god and get a ticket to heaven.

__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL

The more babies you have, the more people. The more people, the more they can convert to their sad faith. The more converted, the bigger the clout. The math is pretty simple.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

No they don't, because that's not what matters to them. It's all about male female domination. The only thing a man can't do is giving life, they can only take it.

Pro lifers "abort" too, a post birth abortion; it's called the dead penalty.

__________________
1979 Black on Black, 300CD (sold), 1990 Black 300SE, Silver 1989 Volvo 780, 1988 300CE (vanished by the hands of a girlfriend), 1992 300CE (Rescue).

Certainly using your substantial intellect and the vast array of technological resources at your disposal you could have posted at least one verifiable link to support the scenario you have proffered in your statement. If for no other reason than to provide the rest of the world the hope and some degree of certainty that it’s more than residual hallucinogenic episode or some “voices” heard in a paranoid schizophrenic delusion. Any link that would verify the factual accuracy of your statement would be great!

I've seen O'reilly say the same thing.

Substantiation from a third party. That's enough for me.

Do you really care what O'Reilly says or thinks?

He represents nothing to me.

__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6

well, somebody's watching him (according to the ratings, at least)

who the hell does watch him? or believe him?

__________________
"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

So lip reading is among your many talents?

My contention is that neither the original poster nor anyone else can document the scenario proffered in the original poster's statement!

I have no doubt that both you and the original poster think you "heard/have seen" O'Reilly makes that statement. I am anxiously waiting for either of you or anyone else for that matter to provide any factual evidence to support your assertions.

How about Bill O'Reilly's own website?

http://www.billoreilly.com/blog?action=viewBlog&blogID=-115522592623938900

Third paragraph.

Good enough for ya?

__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif

[QUOTE=Good enough for ya?[/QUOTE]

No

I'm sure you can read and understand the use of punctuation, like the period for instance!

"In the state of Kansas, there is a doctor, George Tiller, who will execute babies for $5,000 if the mother is depressed. And there are rapists impregnating 10-year-olds who are being protected by abortion clinics."

Most sixth graders could differentiate between that and the original poster's statement:

"O'Reilly likes to go on about how Tiller is aborting fetuses from 10 and 11 year old girls and thus protecting rapists"

The first sentence clearly addresses the late late term abortionist practices, and the second sentence clearly addresses the separate and unrelated allegations having nothing to do with Tiller or his operation of the violation of laws requiring the mandatory reporting of possible child abuse i.e. statutory rape by licensed health care providers working abortion clinics.

Only if you stipulate ab]nd substantiate that Tiller performed late term abortions on 10-11 year olds without complying with the mandatory reporting requirements thereby protecting rapists can the original poster's statement be factual.

Oh come on - does this really have to be broken down for you? The rapists are being protected from any potential child support obligation.

BTW, I stopped watching O'Reilly and his ilk years ago when I concluded that they're all happy old media whores who would toss their mamma in front of a bus if it meant a .1 increase in Nielsen ratings...don't believe that they always believe in what they say.

In theory, yes. In practice, I doubt it. After all, if they don't earn money, what child support can they give?

I would think it would take less than a 0.1 increase. Maybe a 0.01 would suffice.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow

I'll agree with that. The only reason I reference him is that he seems to represent a fairly large segment of the US population, based on his ratings and income, anyway, income that derives in part from people giving his "wisdom" the nod by buying his books.

I think the general argument is that a statutory rapists will bring an underage girl to a clinic for an abortion in the first trimester w/o her parents even having known she was pregnant. And thus escape detection and penalty and perhaps continue with his exploitation. One hopes that sufficient official inquiry would be put in place to ferrit out such characters, such as thoroughly interviewing the girl in question.

That argument has validity but Tiller usually did late term abortions, at which point an underage girl will be obviously pregnant.

I saw a piece on PBS about 11 and 12 year old child brides in Africa giving birth and suffering fistulas, a tearing of the vaginal tissue that often results in social ostracization as urine seeps uncontrollably. One girl also walked with a limp as a few muscles were damaged in the process as well.

O'Reilly's complaint about 10 year old girls receiving late term abortions reminds me of the cardinal who excommunicated the doctors who aborted twins from a 9 year old girl in Brazil, twins courtesy of her step father.

Oh yeah, God's will will be contravened unless such a girl gives birth and dies in the process.

__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K