Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2009, 01:42 AM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Question for Nikon DSLR users

Hey guys,

I'm looking to get a midrange lens for my Nikon D80. Currently I have the kit lens 18-55mm, and telephoto 55-200mm VR, but I hate switching between the two just to get a good shot when the situation changes. Plus, I carry around the extra 55-200mm lens (or vice versa) in the bag which takes up a lot of space.

So I was looking at the Nikon (Nikkor) 18-105mm VR lens as a midrange lens that still has enough zoom capability.

What do you guys think of the 18-105mm VR lens? The 18-135mm has no VR feature (VR = Vibration Reduction, which is handy when zoomed in to minimize blurring) and the 18-200mm VR is way too expensive (even when buying used). I already have the 55-200mm as I mentioned so that covers longer range if needed.

What do you guys think? Any reviews from those who have used this kind of lens? I prefer Nikkor but willing to look at other brands (Sigma, etc). Thanks!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2009, 08:20 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You could also just carry a second camera body with the other lens to avoid switching; that's normally what I do with my film cameras ( I don't like zooms with film). I just use my digital nikon with a single short zoom because it's "good enough" for what I do with that camera. I never paid attention to the VR, but I always carry a monopod.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2009, 01:19 PM
amosfella's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vulcan, AB, Canada
Posts: 787
I have a lens from a retiring professional photographer that seems to be called an asipherical if 28-200. That is the best lens I have owned. It will focus at 18 inches and in low light... I don't know what they cost. I traded a custom made pen that I made for it...
__________________
All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to stand by and do nothing.

Too many people tip toe through life, never attempting or doing anything great, hoping to make it safely to death... Bob Proctor

'95 S320 LWB
'87 300SDL
'04 E500 wagon 4matic
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2009, 01:36 PM
stimpy451's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stubblefield Research Facility
Posts: 244
There are plenty of older non-VR lenses that will work with your D80 that should be within your price range. Ken Rockwell's site is pretty cool for Nikkor lens "window shopping"

With my D100 body, I use a Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 ED AF-S which I think has been discontinued. It's a heavy lens, and I paid about $1000 two years ago, with an older Nikkor 80-200 f/4 manual focus zoom.

Check out this lens, it made the top ten best list on Rockwell's site:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/28200g.htm

Under $300 at Adorama, used.

There's a good compatibility guide there, as well. Have fun!
__________________

1972 W115 220D/8 SLS, Coffman Starter "Ümläüt"

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination

Last edited by stimpy451; 12-15-2009 at 01:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2009, 03:58 PM
Bill Wood's Avatar
Retired Webmaster
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Johns Creek, GA, USA
Posts: 5,013
Here's a good review of the 18-105 DX lens.

It sounds like a good deal for the money but, I don't have one myself. I have an 18-200 VR.
__________________
Bill Wood - Retired Webmaster
My Personal Website
1998 Mercedes E430
2010 Toyota Sequoia
My Photo Albums
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2009, 04:17 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webmaster View Post
Here's a good review of the 18-105 DX lens.

It sounds like a good deal for the money but, I don't have one myself. I have an 18-200 VR.
I would find the barrel distortion at the short end unacceptable; of course that's why I don't like wide angle zooms in general. I have a DX 18-55mm, but I don't think it's that bad at the short end. But lets face it, these are cheap lenses that are really just designed for convenient "point and shoot" type applications. I would break out some real glass for anything critical.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:57 PM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webmaster View Post
Here's a good review of the 18-105 DX lens.

It sounds like a good deal for the money but, I don't have one myself. I have an 18-200 VR.
Thanks Bill. The 18-200mm would be ideal, except it's way more than my budget. That was a good review, seems like the 18-105mm has barrel distortion and vignetting at 18mm. Not that picky when it comes to those things, but the feel and build quality (made of plastic part of the review) might be a downside for me. The 18-55 and 55-200 are great lenses.

Great advice Stimpy. I will look around Ken Rockwell's site for a while and do my homework. Why is the 28-70mm very expensive?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page