PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Politics and the un-initiated... (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=269069)

tonkovich 01-10-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel4me (Post 2379061)
According to your answers, the political group that agrees with you most is...



LIBERALS usually embrace freedom of choice in personal

matters, but tend to support significant government control of the

economy. They generally support a government-funded "safety net"
to help the disadvantaged, and advocate strict regulation

of business. Liberals tend to favor environmental regulations,

defend civil liberties and free expression, support government action

to promote equality, and tolerate diverse lifestyles.

wow, there's some people on this board who want to talk to you. :D

(not me, i'd rather listen. :D)

Fitz 01-10-2010 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnjzjz (Post 2378996)
disrespect is all about looking down on someone elses beliefs

if it were to be done on purpose

and what is it when,

someone points it out as if it were,

what are they in the real world -- hope i am not being to heavy for ya - jz

I don't think you could get too heavy for me jz.

Kerry is, I assume from reading his posts, a university professor somehow involved with religious studies. When he chooses to use the lower-case in spelling "Christian", it's obviously intentional.

Billybob 01-10-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonkovich (Post 2379050)
well, thanks so much, but i read it the first time.

some people (like say, the three branches of government over the last 200+ years) have shown that the constitution is an imperfect document, that needs constant updating and correction, because humanity (well, at least some of it) has learned a bit since 1787.

its nice to idealize a certain group of people in a certain time; let's be honest, they were quite human, and their ideas common in the intellectual and political circles of their time.

I defy you too to provide an example of a circumstance where a system designed by a few privileged educated individuals instituted by a majority has allowed not only the preservation but the expansion of more liberty and freedom for more people in human history! Yours is the typical carping of the perpetually disaffected, you whimper and whine ad nauseum about wrongs that never should have happened, the wrongs that have long since been remedied, and the wrongs you will always see as still evident. You would have a better, happier life if you understood all that in the context of the human condition and in reality how far that condition has advanced in the incredibly short span of time in which it has occurred. Find another place and time when the rights and privileges enjoyed by the powerful few where so quickly, widely and equitably dispensed among so wide and deep the strata of a body politic?

Most other times and most other places would place your self actualization in far worse circumstances than you are today, here and now. Because if you could do better somewhere else under some other circumstance you’ve only yourself to blame, now don’t you?

MercFan 01-10-2010 10:51 PM

Back to the original topic... help me place these individuals against the backdrop of a political map: Glen Beck, Bill O'Rilley, Rachel Meadow.

Diesel4me 01-10-2010 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MercFan (Post 2379104)
Back to the original topic... help me place these individuals against the backdrop of a political map: Glen Beck, Bill O'Rilley, Rachel Meadow.

Glenn Beck= Crazy nutjob with a TV show and a radio mic

Bill O'Reilly=far right conservative on TV and a freak in the bed

Rachal Maddow= Genius lefty proud to have her on my side

Skippy 01-10-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel4me (Post 2379109)
Bill O'Reilly=far right conservative on TV and a freak in the bed

And you know this how?:eek:

kerry 01-10-2010 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skippy (Post 2379119)
And you know this how?:eek:

Wasn't he involved in some kind of sexual harassment/phone sex problems a few years ago?

kerry 01-10-2010 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fitz (Post 2379074)
When he chooses to use the lower-case in spelling "Christian", it's obviously intentional.

Nothing particularly intentional about it although Coulter strikes me as a person only using the label as a promotional tool instead of a true believer.

MercFan 01-10-2010 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diesel4me (Post 2379109)
Glenn Beck= Crazy nutjob with a TV show and a radio mic

Bill O'Reilly=far right conservative on TV and a freak in the bed

Rachal Maddow= Genius lefty proud to have her on my side

Ok.... perhaps another more 'center of the road' assessment a la Mr. Kerry on the same question, plz?!... :)

Fitz 01-10-2010 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerry (Post 2379138)
Nothing particularly intentional about it although Coulter strikes me as a person only using the label as a promotional tool instead of a true believer.

Generally intentional then. Maybe at heart you're a Fundamentalist Kerry, others tend not to think in terms such as "true believer".

Skippy 01-10-2010 11:57 PM

Beck-Generally libertarian, free market, fiscal conservative. Favors low taxes and limited government. Very concerned with the scope, power, and spending habits of the federal government. I haven't heard much regarding his stance on social issues.

O'reilly-Similar to Beck on government size, spending, and regulation of the free market. More openly socially conservative, though he does support allowing gays to adopt and some other typically "liberal" ideas.

Both Beck and O'reilly have publicly stated that they are not Republicans or Democrats, though most people tend to find their views aligned much more strongly with the Republican party.

Maddow-Don't know. Only watched her show once or twice.

tonkovich 01-11-2010 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billybob (Post 2379075)
I defy you too to provide an example of a circumstance where a system designed by a few privileged educated individuals instituted by a majority has allowed not only the preservation but the expansion of more liberty and freedom for more people in human history! Yours is the typical carping of the perpetually disaffected, you whimper and whine ad nauseum about wrongs that never should have happened, the wrongs that have long since been remedied, and the wrongs you will always see as still evident. You would have a better, happier life if you understood all that in the context of the human condition and in reality how far that condition has advanced in the incredibly short span of time in which it has occurred. Find another place and time when the rights and privileges enjoyed by the powerful few where so quickly, widely and equitably dispensed among so wide and deep the strata of a body politic?

Most other times and most other places would place your self actualization in far worse circumstances than you are today, here and now. Because if you could do better somewhere else under some other circumstance you’ve only yourself to blame, now don’t you?

stunning! you make assertions about me that are based on...?

i love it!

uh, just for the record, this swiftly self-correcting perfect democracy neglected to make native americans citizens 'til 1912? i think. wow only 125 years ( i know, more whining. or would that be carping?) 76 years to end slavery. (just a blink of an eye, i know)


please, keep the rhetoric coming. i'm swooning. (but not self actualizing enough, i know.)

tonkovich 01-11-2010 12:28 AM

mercfan: please read a diverse set of newspapers and journals and websites and draw your own conclusions.

be skeptical.

don't believe anything i say, or anyone else here has to say.

everyone has an agenda.

that's all.

Billybob 01-11-2010 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonkovich (Post 2379158)
stunning! you make assertions about me that are based on...?

i love it!

uh, just for the record, this swiftly self-correcting perfect democracy neglected to make native americans citizens 'til 1912? i think. wow only 125 years ( i know, more whining. or would that be carping?) 76 years to end slavery. (just a blink of an eye, i know)


please, keep the rhetoric coming. i'm swooning. (but not self actualizing enough, i know.)

The challenge was to give an example of a better evolution of circumstance than that which exists in America since its inception, take your time!

You’ve voluntarily put forth a body of opinion, now you fret that someone makes assertions based upon it?

Diesel4me 01-11-2010 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonkovich (Post 2379164)
mercfan: please read a diverse set of newspapers and journals and websites and draw your own conclusions.

be skeptical.

don't believe anything i say, or anyone else here has to say.

everyone has an agenda.

that's all.

Great advice.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website