|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Patent ?????
OK here's another worldwide problem with these stupid (IMHO) patents.
This is not an invention, it is process. http://news.cnet.com/8301-27076_3-20001460-248.html?tag=nl.e776 I understand them patenting it just in case someone else does and sues them back but it shouldn't be patentable. And more energy wasted.
__________________
KLK, MCSE 1990 500SL I was always taught to respect my elders. I don't have to respect too many people anymore. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Comments from the article:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was gonna say I'll patent "Rightie Tightie" and get a royalty everytime somebody tightens a bolt or screw.
I'll leave "Leftie Loosie" for someone else.
__________________
KLK, MCSE 1990 500SL I was always taught to respect my elders. I don't have to respect too many people anymore. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought that we'd be able to keep politics out of this thread.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
KLK, MCSE 1990 500SL I was always taught to respect my elders. I don't have to respect too many people anymore. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about the folks getting patents issued for "tax strategies".
![]() Question: Is cheating a tax strategy? ![]() ![]() ![]() http://fulcrum.com/tax_strategy_patents.htm Here's one on real estate swaps for Hattie. http://www.google.com/patents?id=nmsXAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&source=gbs_overview_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=&f=false Got that? ![]()
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|