Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-17-2010, 11:57 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Correct, this treaty is nothing but BS it will never pass. News of it has been making the rounds of the gun forums for the past 18 months.

The kicker is that the gun stores and manufactures love this crap and push it, it drives sales. Obama is the industry's best sales person, in the worst recession in 70 years he drove sales up over 10% across the board. If I had a dime for everytime a dealer said buy XX now Obama is going to make it illegal I would be very rich. They are the reason I was paying .55 cents a round for 5.56 last year! WTF!

Gun owners are usualy their own worst enemy. Now is a great time to be a gun owner, by all accounts at this point we have the upper hand over the anti's. The Brady Bunch is falling apart and probably going to disolve in the next year, the NRA is stronger than ever, their is no serious anti gun legislation that has a prayer of being passed. Plus laws are getting rolled back all over the country to make the purchase and carrying of a pistol easyer. Times are good!
reminds me of a conversation I had recently. someone was complaining about the money a neurosurgeon earns. as I listened to their complaints, I then asked them did they want the $5.00/hour brain surgeon, or the $500/hour brain surgeon? in some cases, you DO want the other guy to make money.

same with the gun manufacturers. it is a good thing they are making money. means they might remain in business tomorrow and the next day. because if they don't make it, your right to purchase a gun might be severely diminished due to low stock/no stock as in BANKRUPT, OUT OF BUSINESS, WE NO SELL NO GUNS BECAUSE WE WENT BUST.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-17-2010, 12:00 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmerich View Post
What idiot actually believes people that are criminals follow gun laws? Please raise your hands. Gun control laws only burden honest citizens, and gun control has never worked in reducing crime. In fact the opposite is true. Areas with concealed carry laws have reduced crime, per FBI statistics. A little common sense is all it takes, if you are a criminal and you have the choice of attacking someone that might be armed or someone who is unarmed, what do you do?
Actually, Britain is an excellent example that gun control reduces crime, along with a lot of other nations....... poor argument. I also doubt the concealed carry argument, as I spend time in both Texas, which has some of the least restrictive gun control laws in the country, and Hawaii, which has some of the most restrictive laws, and I assure you that comparing Houston or Dallas to Honolulu's crime rates will not support your arguments either. I tend to support concealed carry in states with lax gun control simply because I want to even the odds, but I also see the need for sensible gun control - that the right own a gun is a right that can never be taken away, but that right has to be the same as the right to own any other kind of property that could be used in public in a dangerous way, like a car, it should be licensed, insured, and registered so that the public can be protected from it's mis-use.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-17-2010, 12:14 PM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Actually, Britain is an excellent example that gun control reduces crime, along with a lot of other nations....... poor argument. I also doubt the concealed carry argument, as I spend time in both Texas, which has some of the least restrictive gun control laws in the country, and Hawaii, which has some of the most restrictive laws, and I assure you that comparing Houston or Dallas to Honolulu's crime rates will not support your arguments either. I tend to support concealed carry in states with lax gun control simply because I want to even the odds, but I also see the need for sensible gun control - that the right own a gun is a right that can never be taken away, but that right has to be the same as the right to own any other kind of property that could be used in public in a dangerous way, like a car, it should be licensed, insured, and registered so that the public can be protected from it's mis-use.

If you truely believe your statement:

I am married in PA because I have a SC marrage license.
I am legal to drive a Commerical Vehicle in CA because I have a PA CDL.


SO is it legal for me to carry a concealed weapon in NYC because I have a PA concealed carry license??
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-17-2010, 12:25 PM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Actually, Britain is an excellent example that gun control reduces crime, along with a lot of other nations....... poor argument. I also doubt the concealed carry argument, as I spend time in both Texas, which has some of the least restrictive gun control laws in the country, and Hawaii, which has some of the most restrictive laws, and I assure you that comparing Houston or Dallas to Honolulu's crime rates will not support your arguments either. I tend to support concealed carry in states with lax gun control simply because I want to even the odds, but I also see the need for sensible gun control - that the right own a gun is a right that can never be taken away, but that right has to be the same as the right to own any other kind of property that could be used in public in a dangerous way, like a car, it should be licensed, insured, and registered so that the public can be protected from it's mis-use.
Also your Britain statement really does not hold water when you look at the country as a whole and what has happened to the lower level "street type" crime.

While the overall crime rate has dropped the rate of .....I cant remember the term used,strong arm type purse snatches, knife robberies that type of thing HAS gone up.

My opionion and only my opinion is that the criminals know the victims will not be armed so therefore they are an easier target.

SAme thing on this side of the pond, Take any Large Metro area (DC,CHICAGO,DETROIT,Philly) With strict gun control laws you will see that per capita there crime rates are EXTREMLY higher than Say Dallas,Miami,Houston,Memphis(per capita) where the average law abiding person has the easier access to concealed carry.

Does that mean we are both right? maybe Both wrong ?

NO, we have a difference of opinion on how we interpret the results. Always remember that the police are a reactionery force used after the commission of a crime. I for one will live by the analogy that I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-17-2010, 12:34 PM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Perhaps you can quote where in the Constitution things are being "trampled" in regards to the measures necessary to straighten out the Bush Economic Mess? I am under the impression that the American Right has literally billions at it's disposal, and am wondering why they are not litigating such things before the Supreme Court, could you explain that to me ? My experience with you fellows is that you scream "unConstitutional" like a crying Glenn Beck, but when called on to cite where in the Constitution such a thing is made illegal, you cannot, and I warn you, I can cite where such a thing is.

Please spare me the whole "Democracy" and "Republic" thing, I am an educated man. As you probably had a difficult time fathoming my use of the word, let me start by pointing out the small "d" in the word, the US is governed as a Republic, but the representatives are chosen in "small d" democratic elections. Since my point was too complicated for you to comprehend, let me simplify it by saying "in the democratic elections held in the US for the purpose of choosing Representatives for the Grand Republic, the idea that a 2/3's majority of them holding anti-2nd Amendment views would be elected and then amend the COTUS is about as likely as my dog being eaten by a polar bear in downtown Houston". Does that work for you?

Works for me, However I would like to see the 17th(?) amemdment appealled. The one that allows for the direct election of the senate. It used to be the state houses selected the senators after the general.

Also the whole electoral college thing needs to looked at but that is another thread
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-17-2010, 03:19 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
reminds me of a conversation I had recently. someone was complaining about the money a neurosurgeon earns. as I listened to their complaints, I then asked them did they want the $5.00/hour brain surgeon, or the $500/hour brain surgeon? in some cases, you DO want the other guy to make money.

same with the gun manufacturers. it is a good thing they are making money. means they might remain in business tomorrow and the next day. because if they don't make it, your right to purchase a gun might be severely diminished due to low stock/no stock as in BANKRUPT, OUT OF BUSINESS, WE NO SELL NO GUNS BECAUSE WE WENT BUST.
I have no problems with a company making money. I do have problems with them fear selling to the public, and the dumb public for buying it. Its simply not honest, and not a good way to do business. Also in the long term its going to hurt them because shooting is going to be to expensive. Although a lot of it was greedy dealers as well, some are still sitting on $500 cases of Federal XM193.


They had no problems making money for a couple hundred years before 2008.
__________________
2006 CL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2026 Genesis GV70
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-17-2010, 03:25 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by buffa98 View Post
If you truely believe your statement:

I am married in PA because I have a SC marrage license.
I am legal to drive a Commerical Vehicle in CA because I have a PA CDL.


SO is it legal for me to carry a concealed weapon in NYC because I have a PA concealed carry license??
I'm at a loss as to what you are remotely talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-17-2010, 04:32 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
I have no problems with a company making money. I do have problems with them fear selling to the public, and the dumb public for buying it. Its simply not honest, and not a good way to do business. Also in the long term its going to hurt them because shooting is going to be to expensive. Although a lot of it was greedy dealers as well, some are still sitting on $500 cases of Federal XM193.


They had no problems making money for a couple hundred years before 2008.
back during the gulf war in 1991, I worked for a large oil company. then, as with any war or natural disaster, oil companies automatically raise prices. I suppose that could be called 'fear selling'. the current BP oil disaster will be blamed for 'soaring gas prices'. companies and industries control the prices people pay through fear selling.

this is what the current 'global warming' crap is all about. it is all about making a lotta $$$$$$. create the crisis, then create the solution. oldest trick in the book.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-17-2010, 04:54 PM
okyoureabeast's Avatar
Rogue T Tolerant
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North America
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
I'm at a loss as to what you are remotely talking about.
He's referring to reciprocity regarding licenses in each state.

Unfortunately, in the case of his argument, states don't have to honor licenses from other states. They can make it easy on the beauro critters that run the halls of the state's institutions by allowing other state's marriage licenses,etc. but if you are on the fringe of some social situation (concealed weapon permits, gay marriage, etc) expect states to vary heavily on policies.

Personally, this is what makes the United States weak. We're one country, not 50 mini countries like the European Union. State's rights is the only thing that weakens this country as a whole since we are stuck bickering about what some buffoons in Texas want in textbooks or in the case of the interstate highway system back in the early 20th century, states bickering on the quality of the road ways.

When I travel abroad, I say I am from the United States. Not from Pennsylvania.

Finally, one more note. Concealed weapon laws need to be handled as a federal issue. There is too much variation from state to state for a CONSTITUTIONALLY guaranteed right. In one state you're ok and in another state you could go to jail for having a pistol.

It's disgusting.
__________________
-Typos courtesy of my mobile phone.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:01 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by strelnik View Post
Please check your research.

Date of Origin 14th c.
Register comes via Old French registre from late Latin regestum ‘list’. This was a noun use of the past participle of regerere ‘bring back’, hence ‘set down, record’, a compound verb formed from the prefix re- ‘back, again’ and gerere ‘bring, carry’ (source also of English congest, digest, gesture, jester, suggest, etc).

The number of words that have reg- as a part of them changes because until about 1750, no one had any rules in most languages except French and Spanish for spelling. The ones used in English in those days were done by Samuel Johnson and Bishop Hood. The US had no spelling rules until 1820 and used a mix of British and French ones.

Bottom line: your historical reference is flawed. Therefore, so is your ;logic.

I am also concerned about gun ownership, but I am also in agreement on some things.

Own whatever you want that is reasonable. having proof of ownership is good in case of theft.

I own an AK-47 and several other Russian weapons, plus Korean and Chinese ones, plus sniper rifles.
HOWEVER:
I don't want the lunatic down the street to stock pile 500 RPG rounds and a box of 200 grenades in his garage. Nor should he be allowed to own anti-aircraft guns like the ZSU 23-4, even if it is a cool thing.

I don't care if he owns a Barrett Light .50, if he wants it and he's got the money, fine.

Let's quit being stupid and let's quit bringing up the extremes on this debate.

In the meantime, I'm going shooting tomorrow.
register (n)

late 14c., from M.L. registrum, alteration of L.L. regesta "list, matters recorded," from L. regesta, neuter pl. of regestus, pp. of regerere "to record," lit. "to carry back," from re- "back" + gerere "carry, bear." Some senses influenced by association with L. regere "to rule." The verb is attested from late 14c., from O.Fr. registrer (13c.). Cash register is from 1875, from earlier meaning "device by which data is automatically recorded" (1830).


control

early 14c., "to check, verify, regulate," from Anglo-Fr. contreroller "exert authority," from M.L. contrarotulus "a counter, register," from L. contra- "against" (see contra) + rotulus, dim. of rota "wheel" (see roll). From a medieval method of checking accounts by a duplicate register. Sense of "dominate, direct" is mid-15c. As a noun from 1580s. Related: Controlled (1580s; of rent, from c.1930); controlling (1520s). Control group in scientific experiments is attested from 1952 (from a sense of control attested since 1875). Control freak is late 1960s slang.

regulate

c.1630, from L.L. regulatus, pp. of regulare "to control by rule, direct" (5c.), from L. regula "rule" (see regular). Regulation is first recorded 1672, "act of regulating;" sense of "rule for management" is first attested 1715. Regulator is first recorded 1655; in Eng. history, with a capital R-, "member of a commission appointed in 1687 to manage county elections." In U.S. history, applied to local posses that kept order (or disturbed it) in rural regions c.1767-71. Meaning "clock by which other timepieces are set" is attested from 1758.

gun 'laws' control you BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE TO BE CONTROLLED. on the other hand, hells angels, bloods, crips, outlaws, warlocks, MS13 and others could care less about ink written on a page or what you think about what they should or should not have.

some of the gangs are better equipped than the cops. if so-called gun laws worked, then why are these out law gangs able to pack enough heat to start a war?

I don't think any of them have called you on the phone asking if it would be OK with you if they carry a particular piece of equipment.

I'll say it again: We are Schmucks who enjoy being played.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:09 PM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by MercFan View Post
I'm in the process of acquiring a piece for personal protection - as I understand it I have no choice but to purchase it through a licensed facility (even when purchasing over internet it has to be delivered to a licensed place for pickup) which will force registration - correcto?!
Check your state laws, it may be legal to purchase a handgun from an individual without involving a Federal Fierarms License , as you would if you were to purchase from an out of state company or person, or even a local gun store.
As mentioned, this does not involve long arms, but internet companies want to do that anyway.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:16 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by buffa98 View Post
Also your Britain statement really does not hold water when you look at the country as a whole and what has happened to the lower level "street type" crime.

While the overall crime rate has dropped the rate of .....I cant remember the term used,strong arm type purse snatches, knife robberies that type of thing HAS gone up.

My opionion and only my opinion is that the criminals know the victims will not be armed so therefore they are an easier target.

SAme thing on this side of the pond, Take any Large Metro area (DC,CHICAGO,DETROIT,Philly) With strict gun control laws you will see that per capita there crime rates are EXTREMLY higher than Say Dallas,Miami,Houston,Memphis(per capita) where the average law abiding person has the easier access to concealed carry.

Does that mean we are both right? maybe Both wrong ?

NO, we have a difference of opinion on how we interpret the results. Always remember that the police are a reactionery force used after the commission of a crime. I for one will live by the analogy that I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.
I recently spoke with a retired police officer who informed me that if someone breaks into his house, he will shoot first and then call the cops. his feeling was by the time the cops arrive, the party is over. the sad thing is there are cases where John Q. Public is charged for defending himself or his family. the criminals seem to be acquiring more rights and the rest of us are taking it in the shorts.

- the system is working.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
I recently spoke with a retired police officer who informed me that if someone breaks into his house, he will shoot first and then call the cops. his feeling was by the time the cops arrive, the party is over. the sad thing is there are cases were John Q. Public is charged for defending himself or his family. the criminals seem to be acquiring more rights and the rest of us are taking it in the shorts.

- the system is working.
Give us an link to a real case were that happened.
Then do a search for "police break into wrong home".
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:22 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
register (n)

late 14c., from M.L. registrum, alteration of L.L. regesta "list, matters recorded," from L. regesta, neuter pl. of regestus, pp. of regerere "to record," lit. "to carry back," from re- "back" + gerere "carry, bear." Some senses influenced by association with L. regere "to rule." The verb is attested from late 14c., from O.Fr. registrer (13c.). Cash register is from 1875, from earlier meaning "device by which data is automatically recorded" (1830).


control

early 14c., "to check, verify, regulate," from Anglo-Fr. contreroller "exert authority," from M.L. contrarotulus "a counter, register," from L. contra- "against" (see contra) + rotulus, dim. of rota "wheel" (see roll). From a medieval method of checking accounts by a duplicate register. Sense of "dominate, direct" is mid-15c. As a noun from 1580s. Related: Controlled (1580s; of rent, from c.1930); controlling (1520s). Control group in scientific experiments is attested from 1952 (from a sense of control attested since 1875). Control freak is late 1960s slang.

regulate

c.1630, from L.L. regulatus, pp. of regulare "to control by rule, direct" (5c.), from L. regula "rule" (see regular). Regulation is first recorded 1672, "act of regulating;" sense of "rule for management" is first attested 1715. Regulator is first recorded 1655; in Eng. history, with a capital R-, "member of a commission appointed in 1687 to manage county elections." In U.S. history, applied to local posses that kept order (or disturbed it) in rural regions c.1767-71. Meaning "clock by which other timepieces are set" is attested from 1758.

gun 'laws' control you BECAUSE YOU CHOOSE TO BE CONTROLLED. on the other hand, hells angels, bloods, crips, outlaws, warlocks, MS13 and others could care less about ink written on a page or what you think about what they should or should not have.

some of the gangs are better equipped than the cops. if so-called gun laws worked, then why are these out law gangs able to pack enough heat to start a war?

I don't think any of them have called you on the phone asking if it would be OK with you if they carry a particular piece of equipment.

I'll say it again: We are Schmucks who enjoy being played.
I'll make it a point to check under my bed to make sure there aren't any kings down therel. In the mean time, I might point out that you have the word "rule" in the sense of "rules and regulations" confused with "rulers", i.e, kings with tin foil hat crowns. I also find it hilarious that you seem ignorant of the fact that the 2nd Amendment itself contains the evil king-word "regulate".
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-17-2010, 05:26 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
I'll make it a point to check under my bed to make sure there aren't any kings down there, especially one with a tin foil crown. In the mean time, I might point out that you have the word "rule" in the sense of rules and regulations confused with "rulers".
BINGO! you hit the nail on the head, THERE ISN'T ANY KING!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page