Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2011, 08:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Revising the Old Testament

"JERUSALEM — A dull-looking chart projected on the wall of a university office in Jerusalem displayed a revelation that would startle many readers of the Old Testament: The sacred text that people revered in the past was not the same one we study today. . ."


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44117239/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/t/scholars-seek-correct-mistakes-bible/?fb_ref=.TkUeDrdCQxk.like&fb_source=home_oneline

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2011, 08:59 AM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,841
I agree. They should make a new testament.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2011, 09:50 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
I agree. They should make a new testament.
Your funny.



---

The dance between history, scholarship, faith, etc continues.

We will undoubtedly learn/discover/etc more with time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:19 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
I agree. They should make a new testament.
Uh, I think they did that already, didn't they?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:23 AM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee8go View Post
Uh, I think they did that already, didn't they?
I think that was his point.

.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:26 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
Thomas Jefferson took out some of the stuff he didn't go along with . . . .
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:55 AM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee8go View Post
Thomas Jefferson took out some of the stuff he didn't go along with . . . .
That's generally against divine law if you're not king.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2011, 11:59 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Central Kentucky
Posts: 1,069
A new monk arrives at the monastery. He is assigned to help the other monks in copying the old texts by hand. He notices, however, that they are copying copies, not the original books. So, the new monk goes to the head monk to ask him about this. He points out that if there were an error in the first copy, that error would be continued in all of the other copies.

The head monk says "We have been copying from the copies for centuries, but you make a good point, my son, and actually there are a couple of passages I've been wondering about anyway." So, he goes down into the cellar with one of the copies to check it against the original.

Hours later, nobody has seen him. So, one of the monks goes downstairs to look for him. He hears a sobbing coming from the back of the cellar, and finds the old monk leaning over one of the original books crying. He asks what's wrong.

The old monk sobs, "The word is celebrate."



I've been in the publishing business for over 30 years. I know how editing goes. Throw in an agenda or two and you can't be sure what you will get.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2011, 12:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Good one.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2011, 01:27 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
The article makes an error.
"For many Jews and Christians, religion dictates that the words of the Bible in the original Hebrew are divine, unaltered and unalterable. "

This is not true. The doctrine is very specific and refers to the words of the original autographs. Those words, as originally written down are what we hold to be inerrant. Further, we do believe that the copies we have today are substantially the same as those autographs.
I see nothing in that article that would dispute that.

The art of textural criticism has long studied how mss errors occur, and has established general rules. One of these is illustrated in the article---the longer reading is to be preferred. The reasoning is that it is more likely that a scribe might skip a line or a word rather than add. There are exceptions, even to this, such as explanatory comments ( margin notes) that might have been added to the text during a recopy .
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-12-2011, 03:56 PM
sjh sjh is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
The article makes an error.
"For many Jews and Christians, religion dictates that the words of the Bible in the original Hebrew are divine, unaltered and unalterable. "

This is not true. The doctrine is very specific and refers to the words of the original autographs. Those words, as originally written down are what we hold to be inerrant. Further, we do believe that the copies we have today are substantially the same as those autographs.
I see nothing in that article that would dispute that.

The art of textural criticism has long studied how mss errors occur, and has established general rules. One of these is illustrated in the article---the longer reading is to be preferred. The reasoning is that it is more likely that a scribe might skip a line or a word rather than add. There are exceptions, even to this, such as explanatory comments ( margin notes) that might have been added to the text during a recopy .
Methodical dispassionate response.

Reasoned, refers to established methodology.

I appreciate the answer.

And for those who are interested in the exchange of ideas, I greatly respect MS Fowlers understanding of Christian doctrine.

However, the view he expresses here is different than mine. Similar but there are important differences.

No reason to go into them. Just to let you know that not all believers walk in lock-step, are brain-washed, have drunken from the same kool-aid, etc.

Critics abound but a simple reading of the exchanges here shows they aren't willing to go toe-to-toe.

Only take cheap shots and run.

Last edited by sjh; 08-12-2011 at 07:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-12-2011, 04:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
This is not true. The doctrine is very specific and refers to the words of the original autographs. Those words, as originally written down are what we hold to be inerrant. Further, we do believe that the copies we have today are substantially the same as those autographs.
.
Since the original autographs are not available then that dogma seems irrelevant and the belief which holds that today's copies are substantially the same is unwarranted since there is no way of comparing the two.

On a related note, how could anyone write down what God said without any chance of miscommunication? Could the writer have misheard?

Is that a methodical dispassionate response?
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-12-2011, 04:56 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
Since the original autographs are not available then that dogma seems irrelevant and the belief which holds that today's copies are substantially the same is unwarranted since there is no way of comparing the two.

On a related note, how could anyone write down what God said without any chance of miscommunication? Could the writer have misheard?

Is that a methodical dispassionate response?
I do not subscribe to a "dictation" theory of inspiration. God is more subtle than that. God caused the writers to record what He wanted, period.

The doctrine of inerrant autographs is in no w2ay irrelevant. That is why we care so much that the textural critics do their job. They point back to earlier copies, and still, AFAIK, no significant alternate readings.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-12-2011, 04:59 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
I do not subscribe to a "dictation" theory of inspiration. God is more subtle than that. God caused the writers to record what He wanted, period.
Human intepretation of a diety.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-12-2011, 05:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
They point back to earlier copies, and still, AFAIK, no significant alternate readings.
Still copies and hence not inerrant on your terms.

For much of the biblical material it seems likely that the written versions are actually pretty late constructions. It's likely that much of the gospels for instance were stories passed along by word of mouth for a long time. Do you think the verbal stories were inspired or only became inspired once written down?

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page