OK, Obama got a quote wrong. How does this compare to the above? Hos accusations do not pass the sniff test much less the logic test.

Fact Check

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

Since when are the Netherlands Santorum's business?
But yes, of course Ron Paul is "unelectable"!

How much more rubbish will the American people eat from those warp-heads, before they are fed up?

__________________

Here is another Santorum >>> "War on Porn"

Rick Santorum declares war on pornography: I will ban hardcore porn if I

Talking about "unelectable". Meschugge is more like it. I hope you don't mind me dropping this off here ....

__________________

The "funny" thing is that most porn is sold in the bible belt...

__________________
1979 Black on Black, 300CD (sold), 1990 Black 300SE, Silver 1989 Volvo 780, 1988 300CE (vanished by the hands of a girlfriend), 1992 300CE (Rescue).

Actually, Utah is the highest consumer of online porn.

__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles

Your dimwit says less idiotic things than the other dimwit. Congratulations.

False equivalence, again.

Santorum told specific falsehoods about euthanasia practices in the Netherlands because he wanted to score political points in the debate over health care policy. His was a more sophisticated version of Palin's death panels canard.

Obama used an urban legend, the same one previously used by Reagan, to make a point about the GOP's alleged resistance to alternative energy technologies. Does anyone really think that his point was to say what Rutherford B. Hayes thought about telephones? Of course not. He was making a point about luddites in general.

Obama's sin was repeating a supposed historical fact without checking its accuracy. At worst, he conveyed a false impression of President Hayes's attitude toward new technologies. His basic point about people, in general, being resistant to change is fair (and accurate, IMHO). Santorum, on the other hand, told falsehoods about the Netherlands in an effort to scare people away from Obama's healthcare policies. Is one offense, worse than the other? That's for each person to decide, but they are not equivalent.

He made a generic statement addressing a consistent attitude. I don't see an equivalence applied. In fact, the overall nature of this attitude gives a flying hoot about equivalence.

__________________

False arguement: I didn't say they were equally idiotic. Your dimwit is indeed less idiotic than the other dimwits. Congratulations.

Oh. I misunderstood.

It's easy to misunderstimate.

Ya think?

__________________
For the Saved, this world is the worst it will ever get.
For the unSaved, this world is the best it will ever get.

Clk's Ebay Stuff BUY SOMETHING NOW!!!

I find a certain irony in the fact that of all of the various forums and social media sites I visit, the only people discussing the gop candidates are the libs...and the more liberal, the more rabid the discussion.

Discussing Obama's recent achievements isn't especially invigorating for the Democrat Party stalwarts.

You are absolutely right. There was and is nothing to discuss about since Ron Paul was the only relevant GOP candidate.
This can be disputed to whatever consent, but not to see, recognize and ingest this fact is either bluntly stupid or maliciously ignorant.
Tracing the recent indications and developments, I would suggest the heavy weight is with the later.

Chances are, it's probably not what you meant, but I could easily understand it this way.

__________________