|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Solar stocks
Sunpower is up from under $4 a few months ago to over $8, and banks have upped their targets to $11 or $12. First Solar is up from $20 to about $30. Take that, 'ya dirty-pig coalies and oilies -- looks like people who have the b@lls are investing in the future.
(for the record and to satisfy the SEC, I do own a little bit of stock in SPWR, so I'm not a neutral party) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nah, I'm just short term trading it like a mofo on speed while the going is good and happy that it went up a lot and is now volatile as hell. Though I'd orgasm loudly if it went back up to $21 of course.
As far as it dropping again, that's what conditional stop-loss orders are for |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
invest in companies that do not require government help but do much better when the government is out of the way. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Short-term poison = stocks. Long-term poison = property and foreclosures. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why is more likely to rise than fall, other than the fact that it is possible to increase more than 100% and not decrease more than 100%.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
It's not. It's just more than 4x more likely to rise by +0.1 (triggering a sell, taking profits) than fall by -0.4 (triggering a sell, locking in losses) in a short period.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
You are better off trading the stocks of the companies that are influenced by government action. Listen to what politicians say, like in Chicago alderman Burke wants to ban energy drinks except for Red Bull I would bet he has stock in that company. There is no disclosure on politicians trading on what they plan to regulate which is as much inside information as you can get. They can work it both ways short the stocks in companies they are about to go after for there own gain.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|