![]() |
Quote:
I mean what, they were supposed to wait for 6 months? While food and water were being taken in regular, for the children's sake? I dunno, I often don't feel that charitable to govt. heavy-handedness, it just seems like the expectation is they (govt.) have to be perfect, while the people they deal with are allowed normal human frailties. |
Quote:
|
Do you think they would have stayed meekly inside their compound, gazing at their arsenal, while such a fence was being built?
|
We'll never know what they would have done, no matter which alternative we might imagine.
One by-catch of the event is as a rallying cry for all kinds of conspiracy theory nutjobs. Had the gov not murdered that guy's family at Ruby Ridge or incinerated those families in Waco, McVeigh would have been deprived of them as justification for his murderous action. No, I am not excusing McVeigh. But people like him are out there, looking for a way to justify whatever terrible act they wish to commit against the Great Satan. It does nobody any good for the Great Satan to give them a target for their madness. |
True enough. One hopes people with hands on various reins of power took note of what mistakes like that can inspire, and I wish I could think of a better word than inspire cuz inspire is usually a nice word.
Lao Tzu wrote of the various gradiants of leadership talent, or lack of. Not to go all woo-woo but the Buddha had some wise words that might have helped govt. employess in those episodes: "Restraint. In all things, exercise restraint." |
Quote:
If someone grabbed a Child and held the Hostage the Law would do everything possible; including letting the Hostage Taker get away if it would save the Childs life. In this case the Parents were acting sort of like they were holding their Children hostage to the extent that their actions were endangering the Children. That left it up to the Law to act in the best interest of the Children. In this case instead of acting in the best interest of the Children the Law acted to benefit itself because they were embarrassed. Even sadder is that there was not much sympathy from the Public because the general feeling was they were a whole bunch of crazies. What happened sets a Precedent that if the Government can put a label on you or a group that the general Public does not like or care about they endanger You, Your Family or Group and get away with it. |
Or how about when the government shows up with a tank, surrender?
|
Quote:
|
Hey if you don't want to surrender, that is your choice.
Kindof reminds me of the Alamo. 132 men, 5000 Mexican army. |
Quote:
Terrorist!! |
Quote:
There are mixed opinions on what started the fire: DEATH IN WACO - The Tear Gas - Chemical Isn't Meant to Cause Fire - NYTimes.com |
Quote:
One would assume that the Police know that there is a chance of these things causing a Fire and made a decision to use them anyway. There will always be unanswered questions as to what happend inside the Building as most of the Witnesses are Dead. My comment was about if Law Enforcement were obligated to follow a proceedure that would have protected the Children. As far as the 51 days of negotiations that was caused by the ATF not using common sense in arresting David first out side if the Compound. That led to an embarrassing stand off (and an expensive one). If David had been previously arrested the People in the Compound would have had no Leader to follow and likely would not have resisted in the manner that they did. |
Tear gas is produced when the material in the canister burns. Hmmm, burns.... Hmmmmmmmm
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think you have the details of the MOVE fire wrong: Quote:
Every other report I can find or recall refers to a bomb, not to tear gas cannisters. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website