Warranties: Starmark vs. Aftermarket
I've been kicking tires on some late model 210 wagons. Haven't decided for certain to trade cars, but it's under consideration. For me, a warranty is a requirement when purchasing a circa $30K used car.
The dealer cars I'm looking at are Starmarked. They have ~1 year of the original warranty remaining, plus 1 year of Starmark. An additional 3 years of Starmark component coverage (the more comprehensive version) costs $1750. Starmark is, of course, good only at MB dealers.
In the aftermarket I can purchase a five year/100K "exclusionary" warranty for about $2.2K. An exclusionary warranty is one that covers everything except items specifically listed as not covered. The not covered list is short, and consists of items like brake pads & rotors, fan belts, oil filters. Basically consumable and maintenance items. The aftermarket warranty will pay for repairs performed at any reasonable facility - dealer, indie, probably even Firestone (shudder...)!
The reason I ask for the comparison is that I've heard both good and bad things about Starmark. On the plus side, folks rave the dealer was great about inspecting the car and replacing/repairing anything that needed the least bit of attention. On the minus side, there are a number of items which are not covered by Starmark - the sunroof, for example. I'm wondering what other exclusions exist - I've not been able to get a complete listing.
So the aftermarket warranty lasts a year longer than Starmark, costs more, and can be used at my favorite indie. Starmark is less expensive, is backed by MB, and has a solid reputation. Which would you choose?
- JimY
|