Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2006, 06:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
Subframe question...

Hello all,
The front subframe on my '82 380SL broke yesterday, the left rear 'A' frame mounting tab broke off, leaving the 'A' frame on the pavement when I was taking my granddaughter to school. I called MBUSA, and they said the car isn't eligible for the subframe recall - what other cars use the same subframe - maybe I can find a good used one in a wrecking yard? I did call the local MB parts guy and ordered the subframe strengthing kit ($87) and I'd like to start off with a good subframe to strengthen! Does the 380SEL or 380SE interchange??

Thanks,

__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2006, 08:34 PM
halman2228's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 304
No expert here...

...but I am believing that any 107 up to the 85 is the same? I think something changed with the intro of the 560.

I am only a little surprised that MBUSA blew you off - you might get somewhere though if you raise holy hell. Search here and at sl107(dot) com - I swear somebody got some warranty/safety recall relief fairly recently..

Kevin
__________________
"Dangerous with a wrench...and not smart enough to know it"

Stable (in order of acqusition):
'84 500SL, 280SEL (Euros)
'77 280SE. '90 560SEL
'79 450SEL 6.9,
'95 C280 (totalled by daughter 8/07)
'81 280SL (rescued) '88 300CE
'86 560SEC '95 C36
'01 CL55

DD's: '04 S500 4Matic (SWMBO)
'04 F150 Crew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-2006, 10:28 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
i dont know for sure, but the front suspension on the 107 when i have looked at one looks a lot like a 115 suspension, not at all like a 380se or sel.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-2006, 11:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
Hi again,
The local inde is the one that told me he thought it might be the same as the 380SEL, it reminds me a lot of the front suspension on my '75 280C. I called the local Foster Auto Parts, and they said it is the same as some other cars, but wouldn't give me the interchange. I guess I'll have to call a yard that specializes in Mercedes parts.
__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-2006, 11:17 PM
John Holmes III
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The front end and rear suspesion is the same as the w114 and w115 cars. E.g. a 1969 220D. The big tires and heavy weight of the v-8 107 models is just too much stress on the control arm mounts. The 107 subframe used to even have a 115 part number. The major change is that the 107 had vented rotors. The 560 might be different however, as they had a redesigned rear suspension. Replacing the subframe is a big $$$ job due to the labor involved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-2006, 11:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: brisbane,Qld.Australia
Posts: 2,066
Subframe swap.

Somewhere in that SL site is a pic step by step description of a subframe swap,you don't even have to pull the engine.
Undo the four mounts,diconnect your brakes ,support the engine from above disconnect the engine mounts,'Disconnect the steering and check the steering box mounts while you're there and the installation is a reverse.
Use a used subframe from a W115 ( four cylinder car but NOT a diesel) and you may even locate one with "A" arm joints etc.Order a new mount bush kit and change the rubbers while you are there.I think you'll find that the joint broke as result of worn bushes on the "A" arms.
It's a weekends work for the DIY enthusiast ,a proper Merc shop can do it in 4 hours ,including alignment .The hold up is whether or not you used a new part or had an old part cleaned up and repainted etc.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-2006, 11:38 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
aha!

cool

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-03-2006, 03:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
Hi there,
I found a front subframe from a 115 - it IS a diesel, though. Mercmad6.3, why did you exclude the diesel subframe? I hope the difference is minor, as I already paid for this one. To all appearances it is identical, but of course since it was still in the car it's hard to tell for sure.
__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2006, 06:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: brisbane,Qld.Australia
Posts: 2,066
Hi,the only reason I suggested using any other subframe ,apart from a Diesel part,was that I often find the diesel cars have been former taxi's and the subframes have done millions of miles... , being in the US that would hardly be the case for you I guess.
Good luck!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-04-2006, 08:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
Hi - The car I'm getting the subframe from is a nice clean car, low miles, and no oil leaks, so I think it will be a good donor. The yard should have it pulled for me on Monday, also the strengthing kit is at the dealer's, so I'll pick it up on Monday also. Should be able to get the car back together sometime this coming week. I'm thinking I should install new motor mounts at the same time, also new lower control arm bushings, although the old ones do look ok. I have a new subframe bushing kit on hand also. I will for sure check out the steering gear adjustments while in there. I will also have to spring for new front tires, as the old ones wore down on the inside inch or so right to the steel cords - they were fine before my last trip of 8 miles or so! I'll try to remember to take some pictures!
__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-04-2006, 09:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Quinta, CA
Posts: 271
Before you spend any more money you might want to check again on the subframe recall that MB has had for years. I have a '73 450SL that I took in for service at an MB dealer. They called and told me they ran the serial number on the car and that the subframe had never been updated. The only cost to me was for some rubber bushings or something small like that. Interesting that the dealer would check on this on their own. Might have been a slow day in the shop and they needed some recall money from the MB mothership.
__________________
1986 560 SEL (159K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-04-2006, 10:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
Hi there,
No joy on the recall, it only went through 1980, they didn't change the part for 1981 and newer, just put a lighter engine in the car, and apparently feel it's good enough. I called both MBUSA's NJ number and the local dealer, they both said there are no recall issues on the 1982 car. I would recommend to all 380SL and 560SL owners that they keep a close eye on the front subframe's lower control arm rear attaching points, looking for cracks. There isn't much metal holding the arms on at the rear, and it's pretty thin stuff to boot! That's why I am going to start off with a known good subframe and then add the strengthening kit to it.
__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-04-2006, 11:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: La Quinta, CA
Posts: 271
Richard Woolridge said: No joy on the recall, it only went through 1980
________________________________________________________________
As I mentioned earlier, I had the subframe fix done at no charge on my '73 450SL when I took it into an MB dealership for some minor service work and that was in 1998....so they were still doing the recall upgrade free as of then.
__________________
1986 560 SEL (159K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-04-2006, 11:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Posts: 576
The recall itself is still open, but it only applies to cars with the cast iron engine, IE through 1980 MODEL YEARS.... not the 1981 - 1989 cars...
__________________
Richard Wooldridge
'01 ML320
'82 300D 4.3L V6/T700R4 conversion
'82 380SL, '86 560SL engine/trans. installed
'79 450SL, digital servo update
'75 280C
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-05-2006, 11:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northern Calif. (Fairfield Area)
Posts: 2,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Wooldridge
The recall itself is still open, but it only applies to cars with the cast iron engine, IE through 1980 MODEL YEARS.... not the 1981 - 1989 cars...
That is correct. The recall never included the aluminum engine. In the early days MB would onlr weld in braces if the crack was barely visible, so we used to open em up with a cold chisel before sending them in to the dealer. That way the subframe was replaced under warrantee.

__________________
Auto Zentral Ltd.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page