|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-12-2007, 09:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
91 300E CA version vs. rest of US version
Is a CA version of the 91 300E less desirable to purchase over the 49 state version? I have read of poorer mileage associated with the tougher CA smog regs of the day. (I live in MD.)
Can the 1991 CA version be 'retuned' so that it's smog/mileage settings are in line with the 'rest of US' version? 
|
|
#2
08-13-2007, 08:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No rear difference on that model, there is better diagnostics though.
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES) ASE Master Technician Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times) 44 years foreign automotive repair 27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer) MB technical information Specialist (15 years) 190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold) 1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold) Retired Moderator
|
|
#3
08-13-2007, 01:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
MB DOC,
I have a 1988 300ce california model; is there any major difference compared to the regular one? Thanks.
__________________
87 300e (white/black; amg body kit) 88 300ce (red/cream; amg body kit) 93 300ce cabrio (white/blue/blue top) 93 300ce cabrio (black/grey/black top) 98 ml 320 (totaled @ 137,000 miles) 99 clk320 (black/grey/black top)
|
|
#4
08-13-2007, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, but again you have "blink" code diagnostics & the "federal" version doesn't.
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES) ASE Master Technician Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times) 44 years foreign automotive repair 27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer) MB technical information Specialist (15 years) 190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold) 1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold) Retired Moderator
|
|
#5
08-13-2007, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Right. Thank you.
__________________
87 300e (white/black; amg body kit) 88 300ce (red/cream; amg body kit) 93 300ce cabrio (white/blue/blue top) 93 300ce cabrio (black/grey/black top) 98 ml 320 (totaled @ 137,000 miles) 99 clk320 (black/grey/black top)
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
