![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Spongey brakes - 1991 300E
Took an alternate route to work this morning, one that has a very steep, long hill down about 2.5 to 3 miles in length, from about 1000 ft to sea level.
I used the brakes a lot, and then they began to feel spongy, like I had to pump them for them to work. After some driving on level ground, the brakes appeared to work normally again. I looked for some leaks, but did not see any around the grommets or around the reservoir. Is this a master cylinder failure? Or air in the lines or ???? ![]()
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K Last edited by mbzr4ever; 10-15-2015 at 02:01 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Your description matches what is often called "boiling the brake fluid". Brake fluid, with the exception of DOT 5, absorbs water from the air. That water becomes dispersed throughout the fluid, and when the calipers become hot enough, the water vaporizes. The water vapor is quite compressible, leading to the feel of a spongy pedal. When the calipers cool again, the water vapor returns to the liquid phase, and the pedal is once again firm.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, Frank for that info.
When going down that steep hill, it did smell like the brakes were overheating. I thought I was using DOT 5? At least the container says so, but maybe it was too old? Does the fact the weather here has been exceptionally humid/rainy the past few months give the brake fluid more water to absorb?
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K Last edited by mbzr4ever; 10-14-2015 at 12:02 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The usual brake fluids are DOT 3, & DOT 4. Absorption of water occurs over a period of years. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
We also call that situation "brake fade". I wouldn't call a fluid change essential just because you got a bit of brake fade, but it certainly wouldn't hurt. It would also be a great idea if it hasn't been changed in the last year or two.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The "fade" to which Skippy referred is caused by the temperature of the pad friction material rising to the point that the coefficient of friction drops dramatically; the pedal can still be hard, but there will be almost no braking force. And it can also occur in conjunction with "fluid boiling". |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Will study up on changing the fluid, thanks guys.
When driving downhill in my 240D or truck, I have the option of using a lower gear to help slow the car down. I have heard different opinions if this is OK with an automatic transmission. What say ye, oh - Mercedes forum gurus?
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Generally, the use of lower gears in autoboxes is recommended by the car makers for descending steep grades; it certainly is advised by Mother Benz. Perhaps your car has the "B" notch to the right of L in the selector? "B" = Braking!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I was warned not to use a lower gear, ie 1 or 2 on the automatic or it might damage the transmission.
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Word of caution about DOT5 - I think it is unlikely this has been used in your brake system as it is not all that common to do so.
DOT5 is chemically different with DOT4 and DOT5.1 (just to make things more confusing). Do not mix DOT5 with a DOT4 system or vice versa. (Well if you do you need to be aware of what you are doing) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_5.1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_4 Don't think of the DOT numbers in terms of the bigger the number the better your gonads are going to look! Just use what was originally recommended for the system (DOT4) unless the change to silicone has really already been made.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior ![]() Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"3" reads: Upshift to 3rd gear only. Suitable for medium range up or downgrades. "2" reads: Upshift to 2nd gear only. For driving in mountainous regions. Since transmission will not shift up further, this gear selection will make use of the engine's braking power. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Frank,
Pretty convincing instructions, to me. So it is ok to downshift with an automatic. An old retired MB mechanic used to tell me otherwise. He said it was cheaper to replace the brakes vs replace a tranny. BTW this is in an area where steep hills are abundant, and brakes are used heavily, daily. EDIT: I had used DOT 4.
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K Last edited by mbzr4ever; 10-18-2015 at 05:53 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Tried to bleed the brakes this past week - now worse than ever.
Think I made a big mistake and now there is air in the acuator (?)... in any event, I'm gonna need a pressure tool to complete the job correctly. (I even took it a local mechanic, but he won't touch it cause of the additional complexity entailed because it is a mb/abs/blah/blah...) I have a low compression air pump (for air brushing) - can this be modified to push air through instead of buying another gadget?
__________________
1991 300E 124.030 103.983KE 722358 03 412178 207K 1979 240D 123.123 250K (Project car) 2000 Ford Ranger, 187K 2015 Dodge Ram 1500 EcoDiesel 37K |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Buy another gadget. I've used one of those Gunson easy bleeds for years (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz8t6ZkVSQM) and have had little trouble with it unless the connections on the top of the reservoir leak then it is a pain...
...similar reservoir pressurising systems are available... ...but more recently I've been playing about with a vacuum system that sucks fluid through from the bleed screw. Mity vac seems to be the forum favourite but cheapo versions are abundant (which won't last as long but hey you gets what you pay for)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior ![]() Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|