![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
which one do you consider to be a better daily driver??
and of course less to mantain? ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I personally don't have any experience with Jaguar but believe, their reputation for reliability was not too great, until Ford bought them.
My first choice would be an M-B, but then again, I am probably somewhat biased. ![]()
__________________
2007 C 230 Sport. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Jaguars are cats that live in garages. They are known for having weird electrical problems.The only reason they are still alive is because Ford bought them. If ford didn't, they'd end up like Daewoo, non existent, extinct. Also you have all the help here at mercedesshop
![]() E320 is my choice
__________________
1987 mercedes 300E 1995 e320 conversion(hated the 300e grill) HID/Xenon (D2S) Keyless Entry Monochromatic Paint (Custom Blue) Smoked Tails Flat Badged (front) Debadged (rear) custom "carbon fiber" console 18 inch HP EVO rims Sold! Now I drive a Monte Carlo SS http://memimage.cardomain.net/member.../352975_67.jpg http://memimage.cardomain.net/member.../748335_24.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It's interesting and coincidental that you should present these two choices. This was my exact dilemma a year ago before I bought my 95 E320. The only exception was that I wanted convertible (E320 cab vs XK8 conv). I opted for the Mercedes because I thought the Jaguar was too exotic. Though the Jaguar styling may be more sexy, I was pragmatic. I put few miles on my cars and maintain them well so I keep my cars for a long time. I wanted a car where parts availability wouldn't be a problem. I like the fact the Mercedes sells a lot of cars and uses many common parts across the model lines. This means parts should be available for a long time to come. Plus, like the others said, Jaguar has a reputation of being tempermental, especially with electrical gremlins.
__________________
95 E320 Cabriolet, 169K |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|