![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Improving 4.5 MPG
Ok, you'll need goggles to keep the dust out of your eyes - and proably a back pack but it works...
Ann (Photo credits, as well as mechanical credits - Mat at Old World)
__________________
1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Henrietta" - The Learning Experience 1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Brunhilda" - Pretty Sponge for $100.00 Bills |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Haha, thinking of building a Mercedes trike Ann?
__________________
___ /<>/>/> 1967 230S automatic Boston, MA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mine gets infinite MPG when parked in the garage.
If you think gas is expensive try re-painting The 6.3 body supplies went to $1200 At least there is something remaining after the volatiles go. Gas is still a deal compared to Cabernet. It's more fun in a 4.5 than drinking wine (whining) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Paint at 1200? Thats almost a whole lower control arm. Ann The engine, new tranny and front end are back in it today tho
__________________
1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Henrietta" - The Learning Experience 1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Brunhilda" - Pretty Sponge for $100.00 Bills |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
The next best thing when an engine stand isn't available!
__________________
![]() Don't Chrome them; polish them |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you want better mileage, ask Matt if he has tampered with HHO yet. I'm thinking of trying it out on one of my old Mercedes Benz models to see if I can make it work.
__________________
With best regards Al |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Those are Mat's co worker's legs. Mat's are top secret. But I do have a photo of his elbow somewhere... So what is HHO? Ann
__________________
1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Henrietta" - The Learning Experience 1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Brunhilda" - Pretty Sponge for $100.00 Bills |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
By hook or by crook, I'll be driving up to Bahston at the end of the week, Todd : )
__________________
1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Henrietta" - The Learning Experience 1972 280 SEL 4.5 "Brunhilda" - Pretty Sponge for $100.00 Bills |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
A friend of mine is tinkering with this right now, from what he tells me, it's a method of making hydrogen inside the car using distilled water and an electrodes and then feeding it to the combustion chamber as an additive to the fuel.
It requires leaning out of the engine but the fuel gains are supposed to be impressive. I'm not a chemist so I have no idea what the difference is between HHO and H2O (chemically speaking) but it's discussed in Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxyhydrogen (so it must be true ![]()
__________________
With best regards Al Last edited by alabbasi; 06-24-2008 at 06:45 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
There are few real scientific studies on that, but I am are right part of a test with that on large Diesel trucks. I cannot tell you anything yet about how it performs (confidentiality reasons - lawyers, etc - wait 'till Fall or so). But I can tell you that driver education and behavior (progressive shifting, rpms , cruise control, etc) can do a LOT for improving MPG on those big rigs. Bad driver + good technology still equals bad MPG.
And really, it is not about MPG, but about total gasoline consumption, which you can affect by driving less too. And it's still not near the $9/gallon in Europe ![]() Bert
__________________
'70 111 280SE/c 3.5 (4 spd manual) - sold '63 MGB '73 MGBGT V8 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
fuel consumption on a 4.5 is best fixed by
- fixing all the leaky injector hoses - Adjusting the map sensor - adjusting the throttle control You can tune it to be efficient, or to be a bat out of hell, or someplace inbetween the two. -CTH |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|