View Single Post
  #51  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:35 AM
JayRash's Avatar
JayRash JayRash is offline
DON'T PANIC
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beirut, Lebanon
Posts: 1,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAG58 View Post
I'm not quite sure that's my point. The longer point will provide more uniform flow without the intake, but basically what I'm saying is the newer port seems to be something akin to taking about an inch or two off the origional intake and casting it into the head. I want to know how these heads perform with some runners bolted up, as that's how they're going to run. Flowbenching a head with now intake on it is mostly pointless, IMO as no gas burner I know can just run with open ports into the environment!
We cant really compare the length of intakes between CIS and EFI. if u look at the EFI one u will see its got even longer runners than that of the CIS, and by some margin too, and then there is the extra length in the head ports. I know for a fact those longer intake runners of the EFI manifold help in low down pull, but how would they perform for the top end? A compromise I say.
__________________
Jay,
-----------------
-1995 Blue W202 C36 AMG (M) SOLD ;(
-1995 Black W140 S500 (Lady)
-1992 Black W124 E300 (Dima) (Ex-Mosselman
Twin turbo Kit).
-1988 Black W124 300 E 4-Matic.(Nadeen)
-1983 Brown W126 500SEL.(Old Lady)(Sold)
-1981 Gold W123 280CE.(Dareen)(Sold)
http://www.youtube.com/user/jayrasheed
Reply With Quote