Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayRash View Post
My money is on the longer intake port, thou if ur planning to boost the engine the short port will work better since it wont reach sonic speed as quickly.

I mean to say on an NA the long port to the valves will help accelerate the intake charge helping both mid range and top end. the shorter wider port will flow at lower speeds, thou it might acctually work better at real high RPMs. this lower speed is a plus in boosted engines, but we r considering that you will be reaching either head's flow limits.

I'm not quite sure that's my point. The longer point will provide more uniform flow without the intake, but basically what I'm saying is the newer port seems to be something akin to taking about an inch or two off the origional intake and casting it into the head. I want to know how these heads perform with some runners bolted up, as that's how they're going to run. Flowbenching a head with now intake on it is mostly pointless, IMO as no gas burner I know can just run with open ports into the environment!
__________________
1993 190E 2.6 Sportline
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-21-2010, 03:35 AM
JayRash's Avatar
DON'T PANIC
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beirut, Lebanon
Posts: 1,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAG58 View Post
I'm not quite sure that's my point. The longer point will provide more uniform flow without the intake, but basically what I'm saying is the newer port seems to be something akin to taking about an inch or two off the origional intake and casting it into the head. I want to know how these heads perform with some runners bolted up, as that's how they're going to run. Flowbenching a head with now intake on it is mostly pointless, IMO as no gas burner I know can just run with open ports into the environment!
We cant really compare the length of intakes between CIS and EFI. if u look at the EFI one u will see its got even longer runners than that of the CIS, and by some margin too, and then there is the extra length in the head ports. I know for a fact those longer intake runners of the EFI manifold help in low down pull, but how would they perform for the top end? A compromise I say.
__________________
Jay,
-----------------
-1995 Blue W202 C36 AMG (M) SOLD ;(
-1995 Black W140 S500 (Lady)
-1992 Black W124 E300 (Dima) (Ex-Mosselman
Twin turbo Kit).
-1988 Black W124 300 E 4-Matic.(Nadeen)
-1983 Brown W126 500SEL.(Old Lady)(Sold)
-1981 Gold W123 280CE.(Dareen)(Sold)
http://www.youtube.com/user/jayrasheed
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page