Quote:
Originally Posted by Doktor Bert
No, then silly me would put a turbo on that and we would be back to 22 mpg again... 
|
Maybe not. The turboed 5 cylinder seems more efficient than the natual aspirated ones. Although this may be perhaps the higher rear end ratios used with n/a engines. There was one guy seriously fooling around that seemed to at least retain the fuel milage he had after the modifications on his 616. Of course how scientifically it all was is up in the air.