Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2004, 03:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON (Canada)
Posts: 135
Valve downstream of turbo is disconnected on 2.5 Turbo

Recently I bought a great condition 91 300D 2.5 Turbo and am just slowly going through things and checking everything out. What I found today, is that there is a vacuum actuated valve downstream of the turbo (basically in between the turbo and the intake, almost right on top of the engine) that is not connected to the vacuum system. The hose is just wrapped up and where it used to be connected to the vacuum system just has a bolt sealing the hole.

I imagine this might be some kind of anti-shudder valve or something like that, but am not sure. Does anyone know what it is? Also, I have no idea why it was disconnected, but it doesn't seem to cause any problems and there really is no shuddering when I shut the engine off... is it not important and so can be disconnected like this?

Any ideas? TIA
__________________
1991 MB 300D 2.5 Turbo (207000km) (now gone)
1993 Audi 100 CS Quattro (300000km)
1999 VW Jetta TDI (290000km)
2002 Audi A6 3.0 Quattro (150000km)
2005 MB E320 CDI (34000km)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 270
I could be wrong, but this sounds like the previous owner disconnected the EGR emissions module. If this is the case, I would, as I'm sure most on this diesel forum would, leave it disconnected!

If it is not the EGR, somebody here should point this out. I'm guessing it is the EGR because I am not aware of anything else it could be except for maybe the waste gate actuator which is vacuum powered on my 87 300D and likely yours too. If it is the waste gate disconnected, you should have that reconnected as it prevents over-boost.

One exception, if your state emissions program requires you have this EGR installed you will have to deside if you want it on-line, or off!

The EGR as I understand it will glog up a lot of things and add poor performence as well.

Last edited by Mr. FancyPants; 09-18-2004 at 04:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Slop from the EGR is minimal if you use synthetic oil since the oil won't coke in the intake. Thin film after 50,000 miles, just wipes off.

The EGR needs to be working on the 91, or the boost won't come one (boost is electoncially controlled.

The valve, if between exhaust and intake, is almost certainly the EGR valve. Hook it back up and see what happens -- if you get terrible peformance and lots of black smoke (like a squid, for instance), the EGR valve is sticking open and needs to be replaced.

You might get a surprise at how much more power you have, too!

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by psfred
Slop from the EGR is minimal if you use synthetic oil since the oil won't coke in the intake. Thin film after 50,000 miles, just wipes off.

The EGR needs to be working on the 91, or the boost won't come one (boost is electoncially controlled.

The valve, if between exhaust and intake, is almost certainly the EGR valve. Hook it back up and see what happens -- if you get terrible peformance and lots of black smoke (like a squid, for instance), the EGR valve is sticking open and needs to be replaced.

You might get a surprise at how much more power you have, too!

Peter

Thank you Peter. Peter is right, I wasn't fully sure as I know the later 300D's had electronics.

I wasn't aware the EGR needs to be connected on these later engines to perform boost. So I wonder what it is he has disconnected and if his turbo is putting out?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON (Canada)
Posts: 135
Thanks for the info.. I know the previous owner was having trouble with intermittent black smoke problems while driving. A reset of the car fixed the problem each time.. (so perhaps that would let the valve close and then re-open). Does that make sense? I suspect that's why it was disconnected, because they found that stopped the problem.

I also have a Jetta TDI and have taken the EGR valve out before and cleaned it... can these ones be cleaned, or do I just need a new one?

Are you sure that the turbo won't work if it's disconnected? Turbo _seems_ to work.. I mean if I floor the pedal from 0-100km/h is about 13-14 seconds, and from what I've read that suggests the turbo is working.

TIA for any more ideas!
__________________
1991 MB 300D 2.5 Turbo (207000km) (now gone)
1993 Audi 100 CS Quattro (300000km)
1999 VW Jetta TDI (290000km)
2002 Audi A6 3.0 Quattro (150000km)
2005 MB E320 CDI (34000km)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2004, 04:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by dataiv
Thanks for the info.. I know the previous owner was having trouble with intermittent black smoke problems while driving. A reset of the car fixed the problem each time.. (so perhaps that would let the valve close and then re-open). Does that make sense? I suspect that's why it was disconnected, because they found that stopped the problem.

I also have a Jetta TDI and have taken the EGR valve out before and cleaned it... can these ones be cleaned, or do I just need a new one?

Are you sure that the turbo won't work if it's disconnected? Turbo _seems_ to work.. I mean if I floor the pedal from 0-100km/h is about 13-14 seconds, and from what I've read that suggests the turbo is working.

TIA for any more ideas!

13 or 14 seconds may be right, but I am not as well versed on your engine as I am on my six cylinder OM603 which runs 11 to 12 seconds.

I'd be curios as to what and why the disconnect too!

Steve........
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2004, 05:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
87 300d should be in the range of 9.5-10 with the trap oxidizer replaced.

If you feel considerably more power above 2000 rpm, the turbo is working. 13-14 sec is OK, but not great.

You should be able to pull trouble codes, I think (may require proprietary equipement!), but intermittant black smoke and poor performance is certainly a bad EGR.

Cleaning usually won't fix a binding actuator, though, best to replace. If you get proper boost control without it, you can leave it alone.

I plated off the EGR on the Volvo -- new valve was $450!

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2004, 07:21 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,432
Picture please...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dataiv
What I found today, is that there is a vacuum actuated valve downstream of the turbo (basically in between the turbo and the intake, almost right on top of the engine) that is not connected to the vacuum system. The hose is just wrapped up and where it used to be connected to the vacuum system just has a bolt sealing the hole. Any ideas? TIA
A picture would make this very easy.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
https://whunter.carrd.co/

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
2003 Volvo V70

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2004, 10:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON (Canada)
Posts: 135
I don't have a digital camera at the moment..

As far as turning up the ALDA, will turning it up decrease fuel economy? I like the economy I am getting right now and don't want to make it burn more fuel.
__________________
1991 MB 300D 2.5 Turbo (207000km) (now gone)
1993 Audi 100 CS Quattro (300000km)
1999 VW Jetta TDI (290000km)
2002 Audi A6 3.0 Quattro (150000km)
2005 MB E320 CDI (34000km)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2004, 11:20 PM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by dataiv
I don't have a digital camera at the moment..

As far as turning up the ALDA, will turning it up decrease fuel economy? I like the economy I am getting right now and don't want to make it burn more fuel.
No. A properly adjusted ALDA will not hurt fuel economy. If you lose MPG, you went too rich. To adjust, turn the setscrew CCW (richer), or add thicker shims, until you can't feel any more power gain off idle. Then turn in back (leaner) just a bit, but not enough to feel a power loss. This is about the optimum setting. You may see a puff of black smoke leaving a stop (not a cloud, not a stream, just a puff). There should be no extra smoke at WOT or anything else. A 1.25mm thick washer equals roughly 2 turns on the setscrew, so you'll probably need to file down washers if you want to use that method. Typically, 0.5-1.5 turns CCW is needed.

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-14-2004, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, ON (Canada)
Posts: 135
I am going to have a week or so in December to fiddle around and clean everything up, and then hopefully adjust the ALDA too if cleaning and checking the hoses (including the one going to the ALDA) doesn't fix the problem.

So, that's good news.. but now I want to know for sure what this valve is. I've attached two pictures of it, one close up and one with arrows pointing to some things on it.. sorry it took so long to get the photos, but I haven't been around much lately and just haven't had a chance.

If anyone has a picture of what this valve looks like inside, that would be awesome!

Now, back to the question... what exactly is this valve, now that there's a picture to look at?




__________________
1991 MB 300D 2.5 Turbo (207000km) (now gone)
1993 Audi 100 CS Quattro (300000km)
1999 VW Jetta TDI (290000km)
2002 Audi A6 3.0 Quattro (150000km)
2005 MB E320 CDI (34000km)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2004, 10:20 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Looks like some kind of restrictor. The Cummins ISX uses something like that to create a pressure drop to suck exhaust gas from the exhaust manifold to the intake under boost without a pump.

Edit: You can see the restriction tube just after the main opening at the top. It is basicly just a venturi (like a carb uses to draw fuel out of the bowl).
Attached Thumbnails
Valve downstream of turbo is disconnected on 2.5 Turbo-isx.jpg  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page