|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-23-2005, 09:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
92 or 95 ? 300d turbo
All things being equal which car would be better concerning longevity and lower/easier maintenance.
I looked at a 92 and 95 the other day and I'm leaning towards the 92 because I could actually see the engine where as the 95 was covered by the big intake. This is the listing for the 92. The 95 he doesn't have listed, but it's there. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 87 300D vs 300D 2.5 Turbo... | speedy300Dturbo | Diesel Discussion | 31 | 02-09-2005 11:29 AM |
| 1987 300D Turbo won't start | Marcb | Diesel Discussion | 27 | 01-11-2003 11:16 AM |
| 87 300d turbo | cowboy | Diesel Discussion | 6 | 12-13-2002 03:07 PM |
| 85 300D turbo | shoe | Diesel Discussion | 4 | 11-14-2001 09:32 AM |
| intermitent lack of turbo on 85 300D | bznupe30 | Diesel Discussion | 1 | 10-17-2001 11:55 AM |
Threaded Mode
