|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Which car is better? | |||
W114 240D | 3 | 12.00% | |
W123 240D | 19 | 76.00% | |
Neither is really better than the other | 3 | 12.00% | |
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
W114 240D vs. W123 240D
Hi. I'm again looking around at possible cars for my nephew (he got hit in an intersection). I know the W123 240D is a very respected car, how about the W114 version? I assume the cars have different engine numbers/familes, is the older one as robust?
I'm thinking I should call the seller about this car. I always ask about the following: - How long have you owned the car? - How many miles have you driven the car? - What maintenance & repair records do you have? - What is the rust condition? - What are the major problems with the car? - What are the minor problems with the car? - What works just fine? What should I ask specifically about this model? http://adcache.collectorcartraderonline.com/10/9/7/84724697.htm Thanks,
__________________
NOW: 2017 C43 AMG, 2006 Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, 1966 230SL, 1980 450SL (for sale!) PAST: 2006 C230, 1997 E300D, 1994 E420, 1994 Neon Spt Cpe, 1984 300ZX, 1983 Celica GT, 1976 Electra Limited, 1984 Honda Nighthawk 650, 1979 Suzuki PE175, 1978 Suzuki DS100 www.mbca.org - www.sl113.org - www.ohio4x4.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think you are referring to a W115, not a W114, if it's a US spec diesel.
The car listed may have "issues" for $900. A manual 240D is fairly desirable, and should sell for considerable more in decent shape, so ask lots of questions. BTW, these do not get 35-40 mpg, closer to 30 mpg. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I've maintained my daughter's W115 for the last 6 years and it has been very reliable. The 115 is more primitive than the 123, which can be good and bad. Personally, I would just look for the best car and not get hung up on the version.
One thing to try to assess on older cars is the condition of the suspension, including the ball joints. Front suspension is expensive to have replaced ($1K ballpark - not including new springs) and no fun to do yourself. The rear suspension isn't too bad. Scotty |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The W123 chassis 240D is going to have allot more technical info available, both here and elsewhere, and parts are far more plentiful.
The looks are far more "average" though. I like those 115 looks almost as much as Ginny.......
__________________
Jimmy L. '05 Acura TL 6MT 2001 ML430 My Spare Gone: '95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black '85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White '80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed '81 300TD 240K "Smash" '80 240D 230K "The Squash" '81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Check for rust.
Check to make sure the 3 steering box bolts are tight. Frame here is a weak point. Check that the A/C works if so equipped. Potential vacuum nightmare. Check that the heater blower works. Heater blower is separate from the A/C blower. Labor cost to replace the blower will exceed the value of the car. Scope out changing the oil filter. Not the most pleasant job. Scope out changing the water pump. Not easy on this model. Check for rust.
__________________
Palangi 2004 C240 Wagon 203.261 Baby Benz 2008 ML320 CDI Highway Cruiser 2006 Toyota Prius, Saving the Planet @ 48 mpg 2000 F-150, Destroying the Planet @ 20 mpg TRUMP .......... WHITEHOUSE HILLARY .........JAILHOUSE BERNIE .......... NUTHOUSE 0BAMA .......... OUTHOUSE |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Looks like I'm the only one who voted for the 115...... Better yet, look for a pre-73 220D with corner wing windows, massive upholstery and everything manually operated, even manual steering with power steering as available option. The newer 123's are more "point and shoot" vehicles with softer rides, better sound proofing, and an easier oil filter compared with the earlier 115. Tragedy is the engines are NOT interchangable.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
the most significant advantage to the 123 is the less tendency to rust, especailly in the 82/83s. and later if you find one.
tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, that was the German steel workers strike ran from late 1973-79 that left an entire generation of rust prone Mercs. But all things being equal the 115 is a better handling ride, imho better ballanced and better designed vehicle all-around especially before electric junk/science became fashionable. Seems like the further back you go, the more you appreciate the primitive MB's for what they do NOT have by way of accessories and ridiculous gadgetry. Anybody looked under the hood of an old fintail 200D lately? Checked out one a few weeks ago and was stunned by its simplicity.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I started with a 220D/1972, had it for four years, moved up to 240D/77 and I am driving this one for 24 years. to me the most obvious difference between the two is the feel of the suspansion, the older car had a stiff suspension which I like it better compared to the softer 123 cars. The engine compartment is packed in the 115 cars, the 123's have a lots of room to work.
Starting 1974 MB equipped their 240D's with absolutely the uglisest bumpers known to mankind, to me enough of a reason to stay away from 74-76 models at any cost. Vahe |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Like the others have said, with a $900 Ohio car, I would think there would be issues, and RUST would be the biggest. I have seen some cars years ago from Ohio and the rust was terrible on them after a few years; you are aware of this, but I wanted to chip in and say that there could be red flags up on this car, and rust is the biggest one
I personally prefer the W123 as they are newer yet still really tough and simple, but really well built, and plenty of them around for parts. The W115 ones had not really ben "discovered" in the USA and not so many were sold. Take all the time you need to find a good one
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ... 1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold) 2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp 1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k 2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold) |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Wow! Lots of replies in 24 hours. Thanks everyone.
- Yes, I'm very aware of rust being the biggest issue. - The weak subframe allowing the steering box to get loose is an interesting fact. - The difficult oil change can't be much worst than the fuel filter on my 230SL! You have to snake the metal canister around seveal obstacles to get it out. - Interesting opinions on the suspension/ride desigend into the two cars. - Front suspension work will be investigated closely on any old Benz. - I didn't know the W115 (sorry about the W114 error!) was sold in a lot fewer numbers. That may affect what I'm shopping for. Thanks everyone! Keep the opinions rolling in.
__________________
NOW: 2017 C43 AMG, 2006 Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, 1966 230SL, 1980 450SL (for sale!) PAST: 2006 C230, 1997 E300D, 1994 E420, 1994 Neon Spt Cpe, 1984 300ZX, 1983 Celica GT, 1976 Electra Limited, 1984 Honda Nighthawk 650, 1979 Suzuki PE175, 1978 Suzuki DS100 www.mbca.org - www.sl113.org - www.ohio4x4.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Heh
I voted for the W115 too Not like I am biased or anything...
The only thing I like a lot more about my W115 300D compared to the W123 240D 4 speed I owned before are the "old school-ness" You get a lot of looks in the W115, like "Woah what is that" while the W123 is like "Oh wow..cool" Also, I like the fact that that auto trans in the W115 300D's is not vacuum controlled, unlike in the newer W123 models. Also the AC system is much less prone to failure, and IMO the upright fenders look SO much cooler. But, in all honesty, whichever is in better shapeS I got my W115 for four cords of wood, and my old 240D for 100 dollars! so who am I to pick nits
__________________
http://www.betten.mercedescenter.com...n_banner_1.jpg 1976 300D 190,000 Miles Colorado Beige 1975 300D Parts Car 78,000 Miles Rustbucket Also Colorado Beige 1984 190D 2.2 (Dad's) 156,000 miles Champagne Metallic Clearcoat |
Bookmarks |
|
|