Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:27 PM
bgkast's Avatar
Rollin' on 16s
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 6,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
i have done it before too.

i didn't think it was too bad.

but my arms and shoulders are pretty big.

tom w


__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver

1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver

1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 117
I have a 1986 Toyata Landcruiser that had the power steering pump go out after the first 6 mo. I had it. I drove it for the next 45,000 mi. without. Also had a 1985 toyata pickup that never had it. Tires make a big diference. Narrow ones work better than wide ones and newer tires(with unhardened rubbver) work better than old. I always looked at it as an opportunity for some upper body exercise. Only real problem I had was when parking in a tight spot and backing up with a trailer attached to the Landcruiser.

Just make sure the car your wife drives has the power steering opperational. Allimony can be very expensive!

Sedecrem
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:33 PM
rrgrassi's Avatar
mmmmmm Diesel...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royse City Tx
Posts: 5,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by 79300sdtd View Post
My RX-7 has a manual rack. it is not that bad while moving or stopped. i know i know it is 2000 lbs. lighter than most MB diesels. but i would think once you moved the tires back and forth a few times and got most or all or the PS fluid out it should not be that bad. maybe after you took the pump off put the front on stands so there is no weight on the wheel and turn it from lock to lock a few times.
You need oil in the box. Even manual steering boxes have gear oil in them.
__________________
RRGrassi


70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car

13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete.

91 W124 300D Turbo replaced, Pressure W/G actuator installed. 210K

90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 279
Neither of my 220d's have power steering (the Vanagon doesn't either). It's not really much of an issue... the only problem is turning the wheel when not moving or moving slowly (kind of a pain when parallel parking). I don't feel that its a safety issue at all as it is only difficult at very slow speeds.
__________________
1985 MBZ 300DT
1969 MBZ 220d
1984 MBZ 300TDT
1981 VW Vanagon
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-13-2007, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
I once had to drive a 72 Caddy sedan without power steering. That was in interesting experience. Not too bad when moving but impossible to park or maneuver into a driveway. I had to have two friends stand lookout in both directions on the street because I couldnt swing wide like I had to, observe where I was pointing the thing and lookout for traffic simultaneously. I have also driven a 240D without PS once round the block. Frankly it wasn't much better than the Caddy even with the larger wheel for leverage assistance.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:29 PM
ILUVMILS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,067
If we're talking about driving without P/S temporarily(like if the belt broke a few miles from home), then fine. I wouldn't tow my car if I could drive it. But to say that driving on a regular basis without P/S doesn't compromise safety is absolutely ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxwaker View Post
Neither of my 220d's have power steering (the Vanagon doesn't either). It's not really much of an issue... the only problem is turning the wheel when not moving or moving slowly (kind of a pain when parallel parking). I don't feel that its a safety issue at all as it is only difficult at very slow speeds.
Driving with manual steering gear is nothing at all like driving with non-functional power steering.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-14-2007, 07:09 AM
muleears's Avatar
Old MB Driver
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Windsor, VA
Posts: 1,435
I agree

Cars designed to be driven without PS are easier to steer than cars with non-working PS.
__________________

Muleears
'07 E320 Bluetec 133K my DD
'04 Jaguar XJ8 VDP, 34K
'10 Hyundai Accent 60K Grocery Getter
'02 VW Golf soon to be on the road again
'97 E300 Diesel Son's DD
'61 VERY tolerant wife

Hampton Roads, VA USA

Gone but not forgotten:
'67 250S 95K
'86 300SDL
'87 300D Turbo, 364K! R.I.P.
'98 E300 Turbodiesel, 213K
'02 S420, 164K
'01 Prius 138K
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-14-2007, 07:15 AM
Ara T.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,075
True, no hydraulic pressure to work against.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-14-2007, 09:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ara T. View Post
True, no hydraulic pressure to work against.
It's not fighting hydraulic pressure that can make inoperative power steering much harder than manual steering, but the differences in steering ratios of the steering boxes. Typically, power steering is geared much quicker - fewer turns lock to lock, which requires a huge effort on most cars if the assist fails. Manual steering is geared slower - more turns - to make it tolerable without power assist.
Also, manually-steered vehicles may have different alignment specs to make steering easier.
And in the days when manual-steering was the norm, most cars had skinny bias-ply tires. It's much harder to steer today's fat low-profile radials without power assist.

Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:21 AM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgkast View Post
BGKAST ++ hahahah
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-14-2007, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark DiSilvestro View Post
It's not fighting hydraulic pressure that can make inoperative power steering much harder than manual steering, but the differences in steering ratios of the steering boxes. Typically, power steering is geared much quicker - fewer turns lock to lock, which requires a huge effort on most cars if the assist fails. Manual steering is geared slower - more turns - to make it tolerable without power assist.
Also, manually-steered vehicles may have different alignment specs to make steering easier.
And in the days when manual-steering was the norm, most cars had skinny bias-ply tires. It's much harder to steer today's fat low-profile radials without power assist.

Happy Motoring, Mark
I beg to differ.

I've driven cars with fairly wide radial tires and 3 turn lock-to-lock manual steering, and while parking is a bit difficult, it's not extremely hard with even a 13" steering wheel.

Any time I've tried to move a non-functioning power steering system while stopped, it was extremely difficult to turn the steering wheel, regardless of the size.

Something else is going on. It's the fluid. You're trying to push it through the pump when you turn the wheel.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-14-2007, 03:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
Matt L,
Compared to the same model with power assist, the car in your example probably has different alignment settings or steering geometry designed to make the steering effort tolerable without power assist. Also, the power-assist version may only require 2 or 2.5 turns lock to lock.

Power steering is designed so that the steering will still function if the assist fails. There is only a slight added drag from the fluid and servo piston in a non-functioning power-assist system.
If you jack up and support the front end of any power-steering equipped car, with the engine off, you will see that the added effort required to turn the steering wheel is minimal, compared with the effort required when the car is on the ground.

Happy Motoring, Mark

__________________
DrDKW

Last edited by Mark DiSilvestro; 02-14-2007 at 03:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page