Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-20-2007, 09:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto View Post
How high is TBN in fresh oil? Does synthetic have a higher TBN or does synthetic make TBN last longer, so to speak?

Sixto
93 300SD 3.0
Generally, HDEO starts out around 12.

The synthetic basestock does not influence TBN, the additives do.


Tim

__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-20-2007, 02:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 3,956
Do people get some thrill out of stretching their oil change intervals so they can brag about it? I just don't see the economy of trying to drive over 10K miles on a few quarts of oil when it is by far the cheapest and easiest bit of maintenance you can do to your car. I cringe at the thought of going 20K miles between changes.

I always change mine well before the FSS even comes close to saying to (usually it gives me 12K miles but I change it at 8K). That's less than twice a year for my driving. My oil analyses always come back glowing, everything is low, well below averages and this from a car coming up to 150K miles. OK, maybe it costs me an extra $30-$40 a year because I change it a little early. Compared the other costs associated with driving a MB it is truly not even worth counting! The peace of mind coming from knowing I'm not ruining my engine by squeezing every mile out of the oil is priceless.
__________________
Marty D.

2013 C300 4Matic
1984 BMW 733i
2013 Lincoln MKz
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-20-2007, 05:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhdoc View Post
Do people get some thrill out of stretching their oil change intervals so they can brag about it? I just don't see the economy of trying to drive over 10K miles on a few quarts of oil when it is by far the cheapest and easiest bit of maintenance you can do to your car. I cringe at the thought of going 20K miles between changes.

Some folks liken frequent oil changes to automotive masturbation.

I think stretching oil changes beyond reason or without data results from a deep-seated guilt complex over having formerly wasted natural resources.

I agree that either extreme is false economy. But I would buy a used car from only one of those folks!


Tim
__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-20-2007, 07:20 PM
240Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 525
For people really interesting in oil change intervals, please go to the original thread at bobistheoilguy.com under oil analysis diesel auto, and READ.

First off, the guy used the wrong oil. Second, the evidence is clear that he has a coolant leak into the oil that ruined the TBN. Third, he probably never changed the bypass filter at all and that's why the wear metals are so high.

If not for those two mistakes, and a coolant leak, he'd be fine. Of course, it is a VW.

240Joe
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-20-2007, 07:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
You're kinda missing the point Joe, probably due to my poor writing.

Oil analysis saved this guy a lot of grief. It pointed out that, under his conditions and with that given oil (oil that had been recommended for 50k miles by his Amsoil dealer), extended drains would have been disasterous.

I posted this to show the value that oil analysis can bring an individual. Not to disprove a particular interval. I should have been more clear in how I worded my original post.

There are TDI folks who have run Amsoil HDD for 20k miles without any issue. The oil wasn't the problem.

But when you run extended intervals without the benefit of analysis, you may be playing Russian Roulette and not know it...until it is too late.


Tim
__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-20-2007, 07:48 PM
240Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 525
Then you are advocating everyone should get oil analysis then, because even the 3kmile changers could have the coolant issue. That's a fact without or with extended drains.

He used the wrong oil and never changed the bypass filter. If he would have changed the filter, the wear metals would have been more normal and the TBN would have been the issue, clearly from the coolant leak.

The problem I have with oil analysis on these old diesels is that even if I see something that isn't exactly right, I'm not likely to rip into the engine and fix it. These cars can be bought for 1 to 3k$ all day long.

So oil analysis becomes another non-value added process. Interesting, but useless.

240Joe
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-20-2007, 08:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240Joe View Post
Then you are advocating everyone should get oil analysis then, because even the 3kmile changers could have the coolant issue. That's a fact without or with extended drains.

240Joe

I have already stated that I think a periodic oil analysis is a good idea. Period. It let's you know if you have issues.

It becomes all the more necessary during a long OCI. How much more glycol and water will enter the crankcase during a 30,000 mile OCI as opposed to a 3,000???
__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-20-2007, 08:18 PM
H-townbenzoboy's Avatar
Now Y2K Compliant
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240Joe View Post
The problem I have with oil analysis on these old diesels is that even if I see something that isn't exactly right, I'm not likely to rip into the engine and fix it. These cars can be bought for 1 to 3k$ all day long.

So oil analysis becomes another non-value added process. Interesting, but useless.

240Joe
Buying another old diesel MB just because you have a headgasket failure or other engine component failure sounds pretty wasteful to me. Spending $1-3K on another car compared to spending somewhere as low as $500-1K for a good, used engine doesn't sound too "value added". I mean, if you won't spend $20 for a UOA (most folks only get those done once or twice a year, so that's about $40 a year), why would you spend hundreds or thousands more for another vehicle?
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate

Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later!
-German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-20-2007, 08:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240Joe View Post
He used the wrong oil and never changed the bypass filter. If he would have changed the filter, the wear metals would have been more normal and the TBN would have been the issue, clearly from the coolant leak.

240Joe

Joe

The oil has proven capable in good running TDIs, even for up to 20k.

The fact that the bypass was not changed has very little to do with the issues pointed out in the analysis. If the bypass is plugged, it managed to pull something out of the oil that would not have been pulled out without the benefit of the bypass, otherwise it would not be plugged.

Do you think the bypass was plugged for the entire time? Of course not.

Do you think TDIs without bypasses (at all) explode? Of course not.

Logic says this analysis would have looked worse if there had been no bypass filter. It would have been marginally better if he had changed the filter at 15,000....maybe. I changed my bypass filters on my TDI at 15,000 and that was probably overkill.


Tim
__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-20-2007, 08:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240Joe View Post
The problem I have with oil analysis on these old diesels is that even if I see something that isn't exactly right, I'm not likely to rip into the engine and fix it. These cars can be bought for 1 to 3k$ all day long.

So oil analysis becomes another non-value added process. Interesting, but useless.

240Joe

You don't have to rip into an engine to fix every problem shown by oil analysis.

One common example: You run your oil for 5,000 miles and send the bi-annual sample in. You find out your Si is 60ppm, your Cr is 10ppm and your Fe is 125ppm.

You instantly realize you are sucking unfiltered air into your engine from somewhere. You go out and find a poor connection in your intake and you correct it.

Oh, and my old Benz is worth a whole lot more than $3k!

Tim
__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-21-2007, 09:20 PM
deerefanatic's Avatar
Diesel & John Deere Nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sturgis, MI area
Posts: 849
Another thing that ought to be mentioned is that not only should the bypass filter have been change before 20k, it should have been changed about 7 times!!

I don't know about Amsoil bypass filters, but the Toilet paper types like my Frantz have a recommended change interval of 3,000 miles for changing the bypass. Change the stock filter every 6k. Add a quart of oil whenever any filter is changed (as the toilet paper will remove about a quart.....)

I think these results only show one thing......... Do your oil analysis so you can make sure your not doing something(s) wrong like this guy was..... Which is just about as obvious as making sure you Buy an EGT gauge before bumping the fuel on your IP.
__________________
-Matt

EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician
-----------------
Oil Burner Kartel Member #10

Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning!

My Car:

1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP

1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!!

www.icsrepair.com

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:02 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by deerefanatic View Post
I don't know about Amsoil bypass filters, but the Toilet paper types like my Frantz have a recommended change interval of 3,000 miles for changing the bypass.
The response I got from here: http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=789793&an=0&page=1#Post789793

Quote:
LargeCarManX2
Group II Member
Reged: 09/24/06
Posts: 371
Loc: Up here in Idaho!
Re: Amsoil By-Pass Filter Change Interval? [Re: ForcedInduction]
#790116 - 12/29/06 11:58 PM

Keep the bypass filter on until it does not get warm or heat up anymore. Or at least 50K!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-22-2007, 12:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
I've never heard anyone recommend changing the Amsoil bypass more frequently than 20,000 miles.

The TP filter is a completely different story.

__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page