Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2007, 09:06 PM
rino's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 553
IP Timing: differences between slow-drop and fast-drop?

I got down the procedure for setting the IP timing via the drip tube method and I feel
now confident enough about it to do it as my next project in the very near future.

There is something I haven't been able to understand yet though...

What is the difference in procedure for doing the 1 drop/sec and the 1 drop/20 secs? With my engine (240D, 616), I will be setting it at BTDC 24 degrees. I have learned the procedure from a tutorial that suggests setting the IP at 1 drop every 20 seconds. What I want to know is, how does the basic procedure vary from what I'll be doing when setting it using 1 drop per second?
__________________
1979 240D, W123, 105K miles, stick, white w/ tan interior.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:38 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The factory service manual states to use 1 drop/sec.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2007, 11:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Flowood Mississippi
Posts: 438
IP Timing

You will not be able to tell any difference between the two....You can vary the drip count by changing the pressure of hand pumping or even the temperature of the fuel can vary the count...both are so close that either will do..... Lots of information and heated debate on this topic...I could not tell the difference from 22 btdc up to about 27 btdc (performance wise)....on my 240D and 300D......But like the very experienced previous post said....If you set it by the book.... you can say that it is set to spec and be comfortable with that fact....
Mine seemed to get the most power at about 26 btdc....and that is what it peaked out at using the millivolt glowplug method...
Mine would start and run anywhere from 18 degrees all the way up to 28 degrees...the sweet spot seemed at about 26....both cars...
__________________
1978 Yellow 300D (The Mustard Toad)
1980 Blue 240D (The Iron Toad)
1989 Grey Mitsu.4WD Mighty Max Pickup (Needs a Diesel transplant bad)

(Open the pod bay doors HAL)

Last edited by yellit; 03-28-2007 at 11:57 PM. Reason: missing info
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2007, 12:02 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
26 is what I set mine to. Runs better now than it ever has in my ownership.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2007, 12:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Flowood Mississippi
Posts: 438
IP timing

Wish I had EGT sensors in each cylinder output port and a way of measuring the exhaust HC content...would be nice to peak it up for best burn....Also would like to know how well the IP advance mechanism is keeping up with the increase in RPM's..those advance springs must age some over time....
__________________
1978 Yellow 300D (The Mustard Toad)
1980 Blue 240D (The Iron Toad)
1989 Grey Mitsu.4WD Mighty Max Pickup (Needs a Diesel transplant bad)

(Open the pod bay doors HAL)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada.
Posts: 6,510
Hi Yellit, I did drop an email to metric motors asking if they replaced the springs with each total engine rebuild. Or if they just checked them or the fuctional overall advance of the timing wheel units. They did not respond back. I too felt the springs might age as well to some extent.
Since I have not critically examined a timing wheel I am unable to say if that senario would bring on the advance earlier or later if the springs where weak. We should perhaps have a better understanding of the aging charactaristics if any as the units are getting quite old now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:19 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellit View Post
Wish I had EGT sensors in each cylinder output port and a way of measuring the exhaust HC content...would be nice to peak it up for best burn....Also would like to know how well the IP advance mechanism is keeping up with the increase in RPM's..those advance springs must age some over time....
you do have EGT sensors in each cylinder... sort of.
the Glow plugs will give you an indication of temp by varying millivolt readings. the higher the reading, the hotter the temp.
to get similar results accross the block, all GP's would have to be new.
have fun@!
John
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:22 AM
rino's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellit View Post
You will not be able to tell any difference between the two....You can vary the drip count by changing the pressure of hand pumping or even the temperature of the fuel can vary the count...both are so close that either will do..... Lots of information and heated debate on this topic...I could not tell the difference from 22 btdc up to about 27 btdc (performance wise)....on my 240D and 300D......But like the very experienced previous post said....If you set it by the book.... you can say that it is set to spec and be comfortable with that fact....
Mine seemed to get the most power at about 26 btdc....and that is what it peaked out at using the millivolt glowplug method...
Mine would start and run anywhere from 18 degrees all the way up to 28 degrees...the sweet spot seemed at about 26....both cars...
I still don't understand... You are saying that the procedure used for both drip counts is precisely the same and that you just vary the drip count by changing the pressure of hand pumping? I thought that one needed to be very meticulous, operating careful adjustments by rotating the IP, in order to arrive at a precise drip count...
How is it possible that, following exactly the same procedure for both, the two drip counts are interchangeable without varying anything else? I don't get it... Can someone help me understand this concept, please?
__________________
1979 240D, W123, 105K miles, stick, white w/ tan interior.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by rino View Post
I thought that one needed to be very meticulous, operating careful adjustments by rotating the IP, in order to arrive at a precise drip count...
How is it possible that, following exactly the same procedure for both, the two drip counts are interchangeable without varying anything else? I don't get it... Can someone help me understand this concept, please?
The reality is that the flow goes from "all to nothing" very quickly as the IP is adjusted (rotated.) From a practical standpoint, the timing will be very close to correct if the IP is dripping (ie: forming droplets) at any rate.

It will make a lot more sense when see it for yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:59 AM
rino's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
The reality is that the flow goes from "all to nothing" very quickly as the IP is adjusted (rotated.) From a practical standpoint, the timing will be very close to correct if the IP is dripping (ie: forming droplets) at any rate.

It will make a lot more sense when see it for yourself.
If what you are saying were true, then what's the point about rotating the IP by small increases until getting exactly to a given precise count, which is very much an important step in all the tutorials on IP timing I've read so far? One would just set the degree number on the balancer (with cams in the proper position) and move the IP until getting ANY count... However, there are very distinct rates for doing this: 1 drop/sec, 1 drop every 20 secs, etc. I doubt that your answer is it...
Will someone with some solid technical (as opposed to practical) background step in and clarify this for all of us, please...
__________________
1979 240D, W123, 105K miles, stick, white w/ tan interior.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-29-2007, 11:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Flowood Mississippi
Posts: 438
Drips

What you are seeing is the #1 IP plunger closing the fill port of the injector barrel....the drips are indication of the very threshhold of beginning of pressurization in the fuel element .....The drips are an indication that the fill port is almost completely sealed by the upward travel of the plunger...As the fill port is blocked by the upward moving plunger...no more drips...
In actual operation the only escape for the now pressurized tiny column of fuel is out of the IP fuel line to the injector...
One forum member uses a bucket suspended above the engine full of diesel to maintain a constant pressure to the IP fuel chamber to get the drip count the same every time.....that is how I am going to do it from now on...
Hand pumping is too variable for a constant pressure....
If you have studied this stuff like it looks like you have...you are going to be extremely close to what spec calls for....once you do it it will make more sense....
__________________
1978 Yellow 300D (The Mustard Toad)
1980 Blue 240D (The Iron Toad)
1989 Grey Mitsu.4WD Mighty Max Pickup (Needs a Diesel transplant bad)

(Open the pod bay doors HAL)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-02-2007, 08:57 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
The reality is that the flow goes from "all to nothing" very quickly as the IP is adjusted (rotated.) From a practical standpoint, the timing will be very close to correct if the IP is dripping (ie: forming droplets) at any rate.

It will make a lot more sense when see it for yourself.
BINGO! What you are looking for is a drip. The point at which you get a drip rather than nothing or a stream is quite narrow. It might vary by a few degrees, but you will be plenty close enough if you are set for a drip.

If you are into hair splitting, then a piezo electric gizmo for a timing light will get it down to a frogs eyelash, but by getting this precise, you or no one else will ever be able to tell the difference.

My $0.02,
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-29-2007, 12:52 PM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
Stupid question, why hasn't anyone used an electrical pump instead of the primer pump? You would get a steady flow...
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-29-2007, 01:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by winmutt View Post
Stupid question, why hasn't anyone used an electrical pump instead of the primer pump? You would get a steady flow...
Fill up the fuel tank, elevate the rear end; gravity will provide all the pressure you need. No pump required.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-29-2007, 08:01 PM
Scott98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Weston, FL
Posts: 1,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangofox007 View Post
Fill up the fuel tank, elevate the rear end; gravity will provide all the pressure you need. No pump required.
That's ingenious. Very simple and seems to solve the problem. I gotta try that sometime.

Scott
__________________
Scott
1982 Mercedes 240D, 4 speed, 275,000
1988 Porsche 944 Turbo S (70,000)
1987 Porsche 911 Coupe 109,000 (sold)
1998 Mercedes E300 TurboDiesel 147,000 (sold)
1985 Mercedes 300D 227,000 (totaled by inattentive driver with no insurance!)
1997 Mercedes E300 Diesel 236,000 (sold)
1995 Ducati 900SS (sold)
1987 VW Jetta GLI 157,000 (sold)
1986 Camaro 125,000 (sold - P.O.S.)
1977 Corvette L82 125,000 (sold)
1965 Pontiac GTO 15,000 restored (sold)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page