Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2007, 03:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 123
w126 height

Hello all,
I am just inquiring what a normal w126 has for clearence between the bottom of the car and the ground. My car seems to be pretty low. I dont know what a normal w126 sits, so that is why I ask. A rough estimate is fine, thanks.

DK

__________________
1983 300sd 253,000 + 13,000 (10,000+ on veggie and biodiesel)= 266,000
1983 300sd 390,000 (Leaky windshield seal) Known to me as the shower car. Parts car now!
1 junk 300sd Watch out for the skunk that lives underneith it!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2007, 03:40 PM
TX76513's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 5,209
Mine sets at 9 1/2 inches at the center door post.
__________________
BENZ THERE DONE THAThttp://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...c/progress.gif
15 VW Passat TDI
00 E420
98 E300 DT
97 E420 Donor Car - NEED PARTS? PM ME!
97 S500
97 E300D
86 Holden Jackaroo Turbo D
86 300SDL
(o\|/o)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2007, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by TX76513 View Post
Mine sets at 9 1/2 inches at the center door post.
Ditto. That is precisely what mine reads all-round.

FWIW, it turns out the frontal area for a W126 S-Class is about 23.5 ft squared and the drag coefficient is 0.36.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2007, 05:31 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
I typically use the dimension from the fenderwell to the ground on the rear axle because I've done extensive tests with two of these with regard to ride height.

It appears that the "best" height for proper look is about 26.0" above the pavement. This offers enough space above the rear tire so the front end doesn't look excessively high. In reality, it will always look high in the front unless the rear gets up to 27" The '86 is at 27" and it looks perfect with regard to the height above the tires. However, the body is clearly raked.

When the height gets down in the range of 25" or so, the vehicle takes on a nose high look due to the excessive clearance above the front tires. The SD is in the range of 25" to 25.5" depending on load and I intend to lower the front end on this one to improve the look..........in lieu of raising the tail as I have done with the '87.

The vehicle is a poor compromise all the way around. If you want it to look good relative to space above the tires, you must accept a raked appearance. The vehicle was not designed to have this rake when originally delivered.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2007, 08:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, TX (Copperfield area)
Posts: 452
My SD is at 27 5/8" at the rear wheel wells with a full tank of fuel.

I have new HD springs.


Tim

__________________
2009 VW TDI Jetta Sportwagon 172k miles (rear-ended harder than Elton John on 8/4/13. Total loss)

1991 Volvo 240 142k miles (T-boned by a stop sign runner. Total loss)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page