Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2007, 07:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 554
percedes

ok guys,are you ready for this.
some years ago my co,perkins scale corp,redesigned a toledo scale and we had to rename it so it got called a perledo.
now i have to rename a mercedes engine,according to my calculations i now am making a 3.283 liter engine ,this is a 3.5 liter with 3.5 crank,3.5 rods and a 3.0 piston. the complete objective was to prove that a 3.5 engine block could be saved and have replacable sleeves which should give it a life span far beyond mine. mercedes says you have to replace the block when wear limits are exceeded.
so i was thinking percedes would be a start,what do you think?make suggestions.
larry perkins lou ky 103 old cars.
ps did i come close to calculating the displacement right?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2007, 08:59 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You will have to actually measure it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:11 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,843
Do the 3.0 and 3.5 pistons have the same crown height (wrist pin centerline to top of piston)? If not you'll either have insufficient compression or send the piston through the head.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:14 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,843
The 3.5 rod has more swing than the 3.0 rod. Make sure it doesn't smack the tighter 3.0 bore in the 90* A/BTDC zone.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:17 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,897
displacement sounds about right. it ought to be a torquey thing!

Best of luck.

I wondered what you were headed for with all your ruminating on the 3.5 motor.

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:20 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Make sure the 3.0 pistons weigh the same as the 3.5 pistons, I doubt they do. If they don't then engine will vibrate itself apart.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:43 PM
deerefanatic's Avatar
Diesel & John Deere Nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sturgis, MI area
Posts: 849
Why? As long as all 6 are the same weight, they should balance out? Light weight forged pistons are a common aftermarket performance product for g@ssers...
__________________
-Matt

EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician
-----------------
Oil Burner Kartel Member #10

Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning!

My Car:

1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP

1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!!

www.icsrepair.com

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2007, 11:08 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The crankshaft has counterweights to offset an exact piston and rod weight.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2007, 11:30 PM
deerefanatic's Avatar
Diesel & John Deere Nut
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sturgis, MI area
Posts: 849
Hmm...... maybe hafta have a weld shop ad some weight to em.....
__________________
-Matt

EPA Section 609 Certified MVAC Technician
-----------------
Oil Burner Kartel Member #10

Ahh the smell of Diesel Fuel, it's like coffee in the morning!

My Car:

1982 300SD Turbo Diesel (231,500 miles!) RIP

1984 300SD Turbo Diesel Custom (235,500 mi on driveline.) - On Road!!

www.icsrepair.com

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 554
force

in ref to the rod and piston weight,i should have made a note for the exact weight while rebuilding some of the earlier 3.5 engines but i know for sure that the replacement rods sold by mercedes do weigh more than the origional benders. i will post exact weights of both rods later.will also weigh both pistons and post(87mm and 89mm)
its a good point,i havent had any of the 4 that i have completed at red line but at the normal running range(1800 rpm for me they really run smooth)just kidding,we all need a chuckle. they are smooth though.
keep the suggestions coming.
larry perkins
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-15-2007, 07:40 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,897
I was of the opinion that the counterweights mainly balance the crank unto itself. The weight of the rods and pistons balance each other, mainly, I think, and they want to be the same weight too.

I matched the pistons on my fifty one caddy using a paint scale and the drill press at my favorite machinist's shop. You just take the lightest piston and remove material on the others til they match. There is a place on the piston for it.

I don't know though, not being an expert on the subject. I will ask my favorite machinist.

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-15-2007, 08:51 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,995
t, yes all the piston/rod combo's need to be balanced, but that is so the counterweights they bolt onto each throw can be the same for balancing. the crank is balanced so the entire reciprocating weight is equal. that is throw with piston and rod to counterweight.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-15-2007, 08:55 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,995
I don't think this engine can be built... what are you going to do? put 3.0 sleves into a 3.5 block? or are you putting 3.5 crank/rod into a 3.0 block with 3.0 piston? it does not sound plausible. I will be amazed if MB created a motor that can swap these parts.
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-15-2007, 08:56 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 26,995
oh, and if it works...
how about...
Merkedes?
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-15-2007, 10:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 554
tom w

tom, yep been doing the research on the 3.5,one of the reasons i was trying to get a donor block that wasnt useable was to experiment on and not possible trash one that could possible be used again.
couldnt get any one who was interested enough to donate of charge a reasonable amt.
i am waiting on a counter bore bit so if anyone has a old block give me a shout.
larry perkins lou ky

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page