![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? As long as they would add one additional commandment for you to keep thy religion to thyself. George Carlin (Wonder where he is now..) 1981 240d (engine donor 1983 240d) recently rebuilt engine hurray! - No more.. fought a tree and the tree won. pearl black 1983 240d 4speed (Converted!@$$%) atleast the tranny was rebuilt. Last edited by Cervan; 10-18-2007 at 12:00 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't know where to begin to deal w/ that mess I just had the displeasure of reading, but perhaps you'd like to take a lesson from the silver portion of my stock hood pad?? Congrats... you just made the ignore list, along w/ ineon and that guy who never changed his oil... you're in good company.
__________________
Cheers, Robert |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Theres no such thing as 'cold air' in a uniflow head situation...
I'll quote FI... The exhaust proximity isn't much of a problem. It's a uniflow head, the intake ports share the same walls with the exhaust ports, the intake manifold is attached to a 180*f cylinder head and the air is 200*f+ at 13psi. from this link... Butchering the intake - part deux Post #43 of that link shows the temps of the intake manifold... draw your own conclusions.
__________________
Cheers, Robert |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
We can argue theory all we want. I want to see dyno sheets. Intake air temp readings would be nice as well.
Any mod that doesn't show on the dyno is a waste and rice. Are intake temps changed? If so by how much in what conditions and RPMs? Is power increased, or the same? Torque? If so where in the power band? I suspect gains are zip because the turbo would force enough air through just about anything. You may gain slightly faster turbo spool up; you will gain a lot more noise!
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
2016 Corvette Stingray 2LT 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88 '01 VW Beetle TDI '05 Jeep Liberty CRD '89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T '78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110 Oil Burner Kartel #35 http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget that most of the energy consumed during compression stroke is released on the rebound stroke.
That's pretty sad if you add somebody to the ignore list simply because they pointed out a flaw in your logic. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The interesting thing about these little discourses is that some posts walk right up to the line of calling someones car or opinion crap, just shy of the moderators rules. The result is someone getting offended and the ignore list is the only recourse available. Unfortunately, this doesn't really add to the discussion either. I submit that before posting something you consider the appropriateness of the statement if it was given face-to-face. Things said in text often lack the nuance of the same phrase given with a smile. I have had several postings directed at me that would have resulted in new and interesting bruises for the author were they in range. Unfortunately the ignore list works, but again, doesn't fix the issue or add to the discussion.
I own an intake like this that was homebrewed. The K&N I used is much larger. The oil separator is much larger and better designed. The reason for doing this? I couldn't stand replacing another set of rubber air filter mounts and the racket that big filter makes when they are shot. I think I have 30K on the homemade intake and I am very happy with it. I don't give a damn if it adds or detracts from performance. The difference will be negligible either way. I wouldn't call it "rice" as it isn't on an Asian vehicle, it has a purpose other than looks, and its not claimed to increase performance. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
There are a few cases where heating the air actually helps after you compress it, such as a Brayton cycle with thermal regeneration .
A diesel is different however cycle however. Diesels get more efficient with the more excess air they have inducted into the cylinder as more energy goes into heating the working fluid instead of the cooling system. This results in a higher BMEP or in other words more power to the wheels. For the same reason, a cooler intake charge of the same mass will also result less loss of energy to the cooling system and result in a higher power output.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday ![]() ![]() ![]() white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank) desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation) http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Agreed, but the key is that all the energy addition happens after compression (at the "top" of the cycle). I can't think of any case (in a cycle using compressible fluid) where heating the low pressure process fluid would be an advantage.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I didnt nead tu reed frthr then thss.
__________________
![]() Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|