PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Diesel Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/)
-   -   E300d 1996-1999 (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/diesel-discussion/208262-e300d-1996-1999-a.html)

wolfgang0526 12-16-2007 09:22 PM

E300d 1996-1999
 
What Is The Best Year??

husk 12-16-2007 09:38 PM

1999

TMAllison 12-16-2007 09:43 PM

Depends on what you want.

606.912 (N/A 96-97) the 97 with the 722.6 trans was prob best, the 96 had the 722.4 trans.

606.962 (turbo 98-99) the 99 added head air bags front AND rear + a few other minor changes.

All years are good durable engines including the W124 95 (606.910).

I like the turbo personally.

Skid Row Joe 12-16-2007 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMAllison (Post 1706057)
Depends on what you want.

606.912 (N/A 96-97) the 97 with the 722.6 trans was prob best, the 96 had the 722.4 trans.

606.962 (turbo 98-99) the 99 added head air bags front AND rear + a few other minor changes.

All years are good durable engines including the W124 95 (606.910).

I like the turbo personally.

100% agreement here......

I'll keep my '99 E300TD.

Matt L 12-16-2007 11:03 PM

I've never driven a '97, and would probably like it too much if I did, but as it is I rather like my 722.4 transmission.

ARINUTS 12-17-2007 12:26 AM

so was 99 the only year you could get the w210 300D turbocharged?

Hatterasguy 12-17-2007 12:30 AM

1998-99. You want the turbo, and 5spd.

nhdoc 12-17-2007 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARINUTS (Post 1706229)
so was 99 the only year you could get the w210 300D turbocharged?

the turbo was in the '98 and '99. Both are very similar, but as Terry mentioned the '99 has some added airbags and a couple of other things. I have heard rumors that the '99 had a slightly modified cam which is why the EPA MPG numbers are slightly different for it but that might just be folklore.

scott19_68 12-17-2007 11:31 AM

I've heard rumors that the first batch of 722.6 transmissions (early build '98s) had some bad valve body castings that made for expensive repairs. Also, the transmission firmware has been revised a fair bit as well.

I'd agree that the '99s are the best. My '98 has a torque converter drain plug which was removed on the '99s but no big deal.

Jeremy5848 12-17-2007 11:47 AM

That's not the problem...
 
The cars got progressively more complex (and expensive to repair) as the years passed. However, for those of us in the West, where fewer of them seem to have been sold, the problem is finding one regardless of the year. When I shopped around, almost everything I saw on the various ads, lists, etc., was back East somewhere. I would rather have had a '98-99 but bought the '96 because that is what turned up and I wanted to stop shopping and start driving.

Jeremy

aklim 12-17-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott19_68 (Post 1706608)
I'd agree that the '99s are the best. My '98 has a torque converter drain plug which was removed on the '99s but no big deal.

Wierd. My 99 has a drain plug

TMAllison 12-17-2007 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 1706655)
Wierd. My 99 has a drain plug

My 99 has one as well. Build date was 7/98. They were eliminated part way through 99 model year production.

husk 12-17-2007 12:29 PM

The 99's are the last and best of the breed:

These include the inclusion of a LED third brake light on the rear hat rack

Fiber Optic Radio System

More Airbags

Also my 99 has the drain plug as well...build date 05/99 (Which would mean one of the last diesels built?)

michakaveli 12-17-2007 01:51 PM

Additional Note.... if you like the w124 OM606 with the 4spd, you will LOVE the w210 with the OM606 and the 5 speed.... It's butter smooth. If you don't care about the speed then then a well maintained NA OM606 will do the trick.

There was recently a nice '97 E300 on eBay well loaded that went for $10,500 or so. Leather, heated seats, etc...

Best is to have one of each though :D

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 03:56 PM

I believe the '96 is the most reliable of them. It has the old-style, vacuum-operated transmission (no software bugs to deal with and easier to service), no turbo to warp the air filter box or leak oil, and no MAF that goes bad, though you may get to deal with sticking intake flaps instead. Of course the non-turbo OM606 is quite weak compared to the turbo version, but it's more than adequate around town and normal highway driving.

sokoloff 12-17-2007 04:48 PM

Torque converter drain plug disappeared in September, 1999 I think. My '99 has one and it was a March, 1999 build.

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 05:09 PM

Why would MB eliminate the drain plug? To make everyone's life more difficult?

TMAllison 12-17-2007 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DieselAddict (Post 1706968)
Why would MB eliminate the drain plug? To make everyone's life more difficult?

This would have been in the midst of the "filled for life" era. More interesting question would be does the 722.9 have a TC drain plug or not?

aklim 12-17-2007 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DieselAddict (Post 1706913)
I believe the '96 is the most reliable of them. It has the old-style, vacuum-operated transmission (no software bugs to deal with and easier to service), no turbo to warp the air filter box or leak oil, and no MAF that goes bad, though you may get to deal with sticking intake flaps instead.

Of course the non-turbo OM606 is quite weak compared to the turbo version, but it's more than adequate around town and normal highway driving.

I don't know about you but on our 99, we didn't have any issues with the 722.6 trans. Don't know what software bugs you are talking about. Can you elaborate?

We found the 99 quite weak and it is currently acceptable AFTER chipping it. Not sure how the wife will like the non-turbo one. As for me, I probably will hate it and not buy it for the reason it feels sluggish. The turbo one felt sluggish compared to the 99 C280 even.

aklim 12-17-2007 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMAllison (Post 1706988)
This would have been in the midst of the "filled for life" era. More interesting question would be does the 722.9 have a TC drain plug or not?

According to Gilly:

Filled for life?
The 722.6 Automatic Transmission uses a special oil and is said to be filled for life. The oil can only be purchased through the Mercedes-Benz dealer using part number 001-989-21-03-10. A 722.6 holds about 9.3 liters and the fluid is sold by the liter. Checking the fluid is accomplished by breaking off the red locking seal located at the dip stick. the lock is replaced after the oil is checked. Use part number 140-991-00-55 for a new lock. There is no dip stick to check the ATF. You need a special tool to check the fluid on all 722.6 transmissions, part number 140-589-15-21-00. The oil level is a critical factor in transmission shifting. See Service Information 27A95105 for details. When you refill, or check thetransmission fluid level make sure that you check the level with the special tool and at the correct temperature. The latest information from Germany is that we should fill the oil to the MAX line. Not overfilled, just maxed out. This is said to improve shift quality. At normal level it is possible for the oil to form air bubbles. The increased level helps to minimize this. You might want to remember to try this on customer complaints involving shift quality before you replace any component. Along with setting the adaptation you would be surprised to see how much of an improvement you will see.

The Automatic Transmission fluid is said to be filled for life. We never specified who's life. (Yes, they actually wrote that in this!-DG) The transmission control module contains a program that keeps a running count of the "calculated" cndition of the ATF oil. (Note from Gilly-I believe this was deleted from the modules right around 2001-2002, not there anymore-DG) The factors that affect the oil are time and temperature. The counter is incremented with engine running time and incremented greater with higher ATF temperatures. The Hand-Held Tester (now SDS-DG) displays a numerical value that represents the value of the calculation. At some given point in time Germany will tell us (still waiting, evidently-DG) which number means its time to change the oil. For now there is no service interval for the ATF oil. If you replace a transmission you should re-set the counter back to zero to account for the new oil. If you are doing internal work and you are replacing the oil you should also re-set the counter. It is acceptable to drain the oil out into a clean container and reuse it, provided it was collected using the MB filter funnel. Remember to flush the converter and kines before installing the new transmission. You should also replace the converter if the transmission was HEAVILY contaminated with metal. Make sure you return the converter with the transmission to warranty. Fine metal particles in the bottom of the pan are allowed. (I think what they mean here is that fine metal particles are considered an "acceptable" condition, do NOT replace transmission, as you will see if you read on:-DG)

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 05:58 PM

aklim, see post #9. I don't remember what kind of bugs those were, but I remember reading about them a few years ago when I was searching around the forum. It seems that most of the problems involved the '97 model year which was the first one to have this transmission.

Yes, we all know how you think your E300 Turbodiesel is all poochy and barely acceptable. You forgot to mention that the only reason you got it was the increased mileage for your wife's commute. ;)

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 06:03 PM

I must say I appreciate the dipstick on my 722.4 transmission. :P

Regarding the "filled for life" notion, for all practical purposes it means the warranty's life.

aklim 12-17-2007 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DieselAddict (Post 1707029)
aklim, see post #9. I don't remember what kind of bugs those were, but I remember reading about them a few years ago when I was searching around the forum. It seems that most of the problems involved the '97 model year which was the first one to have this transmission.

Yes, we all know how you think your E300 Turbodiesel is all poochy and barely acceptable. You forgot to mention that the only reason you got it was the increased mileage for your wife's commute. ;)

I was trying to see if anyone had anything more specific.

Yes, that was the reason we got it. However, SHE started complaining that it wasn't spritely as she would like it. Well, no kidding. It isn't as fun to drive as my Vette. Whoda thunk it? Right now, with the chip, it is acceptable AND we get 33 mpg cruising at 85 mph, in theory. :D If she wants to hop it up, who am I to refuse? Hell, if I could be bothered one day, I'd borrow SDS and up the boost. Maybe a manually calibrated wastegate too. Faster spool up. I never argue with the wife when she says a car is poochy. So yes, we got it for better mileage for her long commute but we still want the acceleration. Too much power, IMO, is a good starting point.

aklim 12-17-2007 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DieselAddict (Post 1707034)
I must say I appreciate the dipstick on my 722.4 transmission. :P

The only sore point I can see is that you need SDS and the magical dipstick to check the level. However, I don't really care since I flush it every 60K whether MB says it needs it or not.

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 06:13 PM

Ever consider the E320 Bluetec? 400 ft-lbs of torque and still over 30 mpg on the highway.

aklim 12-17-2007 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DieselAddict (Post 1707046)
Ever consider the E320 Bluetec? 400 ft-lbs of torque and still over 30 mpg on the highway.

Every damn day of every damn week. Hoping the wife will agree to a change. Also, my mechanic tells me that they do have a bunch of stuff for it to make it go faster. All for the wife's sake, of course. ;)

Jeremy5848 12-17-2007 07:20 PM

Let it rev!
 
The NA 606 engine does quite well if you keep your foot down and let the engine spin up to 4500 RPM or better. It really likes to rev, reminds me of my '64 Alfa Romeo Guilia Spyder. The E300D would be a lot more fun with a manual transmission. The auto shifts way too soon for my liking but I suppose that's better for the fuel economy. The car definitely feels underpowered if you try to lug it around at 2000 RPM. Does the 722.6 electronic transmission give you more control over shift points?

Jeremy

DieselAddict 12-17-2007 08:30 PM

Make sure your Bowden cable is adjusted all the way back for maximum tension. That will delay the upshifts to an acceptable point IMO. I agree this engine likes to rev and it's unlike a typical diesel engine where most of the torque is in the lower RPM range.

Jay Gibbs 12-17-2007 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by husk (Post 1706673)
The 99's are the last and best of the breed:

These include the inclusion of a LED third brake light on the rear hat rack

Fiber Optic Radio System

More Airbags

Also my 99 has the drain plug as well...build date 05/99 (Which would mean one of the last diesels built?)

Mine has a build date of 6/99 (serial # 940019) Don't know about the drain plug. I'll check next time I have the encapsulation panels off.

husk 12-17-2007 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Gibbs (Post 1707173)
Mine has a build date of 6/99 (serial # 940019) Don't know about the drain plug. I'll check next time I have the encapsulation panels off.

WOW 6/99 yours might be the last one built , I was under the impression that May was the last month and June was the cross-over year. I have chassis number 931815.

Hatterasguy 12-17-2007 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 1707065)
Every damn day of every damn week. Hoping the wife will agree to a change. Also, my mechanic tells me that they do have a bunch of stuff for it to make it go faster. All for the wife's sake, of course. ;)

E55 AMG:D

If you want a car with balls...

Skid Row Joe 12-17-2007 09:55 PM

4/99 #917689

aklim 12-17-2007 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 (Post 1707102)
Does the 722.6 electronic transmission give you more control over shift points?

Jeremy

Don't think so.

aklim 12-17-2007 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatterasguy (Post 1707211)
E55 AMG:D

If you want a car with balls...

Lingenfelter Performance Engineering. How fast depends on your wallet.

Hatterasguy 12-17-2007 10:19 PM

Same with Brabus, just with them you have to dig a bit deeper.:D

Last I checked the Brabus Rocket was $250k. But it will do 220mph.:D
http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/0...s_rocket_8.jpg

Like the old saying: "Speed is only a queston of money, how fast do you want to go?":D

husk 12-17-2007 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 1707239)
4/99 #917689

We should do a thread with 99 E300's and their last 6 vin#'s with build date. This would be interesting to find out when most of the 99's were built... I am intersted to see how many 6/99's we have!

husk 12-17-2007 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 (Post 1707102)
. Does the 722.6 electronic transmission give you more control over shift points?

Jeremy

The MY00+ had the controllable transmission with the - and +. I believe they were the same transmissions, with a different control unit. If mine ever goes out I will be getting the updated control module. Especially handy since you can see what gear you are in on the cluster.

Jeremy5848 12-17-2007 11:20 PM

Yawn
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by husk (Post 1707335)
you can see what gear you are in on the cluster.

My BMW K-bike had that feature over twenty years ago.

aklim 12-18-2007 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by husk (Post 1707331)
We should do a thread with 99 E300's and their last 6 vin#'s with build date. This would be interesting to find out when most of the 99's were built... I am intersted to see how many 6/99's we have!

903171

Parrot of Doom 12-18-2007 06:16 AM

Posting full VIN's is a great way to help car thieves to clone cars.

ForcedInduction 12-18-2007 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parrot of Doom (Post 1707507)
Posting full VIN's is a great way to help car thieves to clone cars.

Not really. If it was then eBay, or any parking lot for that matter, would be an open bank vault to them.

aklim 12-18-2007 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parrot of Doom (Post 1707507)
Posting full VIN's is a great way to help car thieves to clone cars.

Forgot about that. Thanx

nate300d 12-18-2007 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sokoloff (Post 1706952)
Torque converter drain plug disappeared in September, 1999 I think. My '99 has one and it was a March, 1999 build.

I did not know that the plug was gone. My 1999 has the drain plug as I used it to change the transmission fluid. My E300 has a build date of December 1998.

sokoloff 12-18-2007 12:00 PM

877180 - March of 1999

husk 12-18-2007 12:43 PM

Here is the list so far
 
Year,Build Date,Serial,Owner
1999,Jul-98,782860,TMALLISON
1999,Dec-98,,nate300d
1999,,862624,ebay
1999,Mar-99,877180,Sokoloff
1999,Mar-99,896766,ebay
1999.Apr-99,905210,ebay
1999,Apr-99,917689,Skid Row Joe
1999,Apr-99,918537,ebay
1999,May-99,930117,ebay
1999,May-99,930645
1999,May-99,931815,Husk
1999,May-99,933446,Autotrader
1999,May-99,933580,ebay
1999,Jun-99,940019,Jay Gibbs
1999,,940282,Autotrader

TMAllison 12-18-2007 12:51 PM

782860

Production date: 7.10.98 to be precise.

Hatterasguy 12-18-2007 01:04 PM

How do you get the production date? Is it hidden in the VIN?

Matt L 12-18-2007 01:23 PM

The production date for my car is on the B pillar.

TMAllison 12-18-2007 01:55 PM

http://old.mbclub.ru/mb/vin/?lng=eng

Enter VIN

aklim 12-18-2007 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMAllison (Post 1707904)

That gives me a delivery date only or am I missing something?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website