Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-26-2008, 10:46 AM
Unofficial wormcan opener
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ashland, MA
Posts: 2,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by cphilip View Post
Some of the difference you seeing Paul, could maybe be attributed to a small percentage of Bio Diesel being blended into the Fuel. I think they can go up to 5% without labeling it as Bio blend IIRC. Combined with a 2-3% loss (if we agree that could occur) you could get another percent or two maybe out of Bio Blend? Might be something else too... probably several variables together here giving you a drop?
Biodiesel has between 5-8% less BTUs. So for the sake of your statement and my math skills ,lets say it has 10% less power. Lets also assume they did sneak 5% into the mix. 10% of 5% is .5%. So half of 1% less power is causing a noticeable loss of mpg? I think you might be looking in the wrong place. If they did add even 3% biodiesel, it would more than make up for the lubricity loss in the ULSD.

__________________
1987 300TD 309, xxx 2.8.2014 10,000 mile OCI


Be careful of the toes you step on today, as they may be connected to the ass you have to kiss tomorrow. anonymous

“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter won’t mind.” Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-26-2008, 09:50 PM
Tradesman with2MB diesels
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hickory hills il.
Posts: 174
I"ve come to a loose conclusion that the fuel is being mixed with something that affects newer Benz diesels. As i stated earier in this post, my wife's 97E300D has a very noticable drop in mpg s and my 85 300SD shows no change, I think this is a regional thing where certain regions do something to their fuel. Others on this site are getting good mpg s on their 96 or 97 E300D's . How many different refineries are there in this country? Are they dilluting it with something after it leaves the refineries ? Just shooting from the hip here, but what is going on? Jim
__________________
1997 E300D Wife's daily driver
1985 300SD my daily driver
1999 Expedition family road trip and material hauler
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-27-2008, 09:18 AM
Waitn For The Bus All Day
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south east pa.
Posts: 1,786
Since the introduction of ULSD, I have noticed a 2 MPG drop with my MBZ's. My truck, 7.3 F250, dropped 3 MPG's. Added a chip to the F250 and picked up anywhere from 1.8 to 3 MPG, depending on how I drive it.

Everybody I know that runs the 7.3's has had a 3MPG drop that coincided with the introduction of ULSD. I know a lot of long time truckers who have also lost MPG's.

Sulphur should have nothing to do with the loss. It must have been something else they changed in the fuel.

Cheers,

Bill
__________________
Cheers,
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-27-2008, 01:16 PM
mechmagcn's Avatar
Just another diesel junky
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mt Holly AR
Posts: 295
When the ULSD first hit the market, my 82 300SD dropped 2 MPG immediately, my LN 8000 Ford with a 6-71 Detroit dropped from 8.2 to 6.7. Mixing used motor oil into the ULSD did bring most of the mileage back on the old Detroit, but I was hesitant to run it in the MB. I have found that I can increase the mileage in my 94 F250 7.3 IDI by 1 MPG by putting 8 oz. of outboard motor oil per tank (19 gallons). These are just my observations over a period of time, not meant to be scientific at all.
I am a truck and heavy equipment mechanic and have noticed more customers with older, non-computerized engines complaining about the loss of fuel economy, but I don't have any figures to back this.
Jeff
__________________
1971 R600 Mack toterhome (SuperDawg)
99 NU-WA Snowbird 34+2 SE 102 5er
If it's not diesel, it's not in my stable!
53 F100 617.951/auto
95 Dodge 3500 Cummins/5 speed service truck
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim View Post
I"ve come to a loose conclusion that the fuel is being mixed with something that affects newer Benz diesels. As i stated earier in this post, my wife's 97E300D has a very noticable drop in mpg s and my 85 300SD shows no change, I think this is a regional thing where certain regions do something to their fuel. Others on this site are getting good mpg s on their 96 or 97 E300D's . How many different refineries are there in this country? Are they dilluting it with something after it leaves the refineries ? Just shooting from the hip here, but what is going on? Jim
Are you sure your 97 hasn't developed a fuel leak? If the mileage drop is due to the fuel you should have noticed it in both cars.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-28-2008, 01:53 PM
cphilip's Avatar
cphilip.com
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clemson SC
Posts: 650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bio300TDTdriver View Post
Biodiesel has between 5-8% less BTUs. So for the sake of your statement and my math skills ,lets say it has 10% less power. Lets also assume they did sneak 5% into the mix. 10% of 5% is .5%. So half of 1% less power is causing a noticeable loss of mpg? I think you might be looking in the wrong place. If they did add even 3% biodiesel, it would more than make up for the lubricity loss in the ULSD.
Yea... I was just throwing that out there. Got no idea really but figured it was worth mentioning as a small part of the whole. I'm not looking in any particular one place. I was suggesting we look in several places. Some of which are unknown or unmentioned. I think we can attribute some of it to USDL for certain. But again, our math doesn't work out to attribute all of it to just that. And even if we add some Bio Diesel BTU loss to it, we still got a ways to go. I can't see either ULSD and even some Bio accounting for all of it. But a portion of it... where's the rest? I got no idea...
__________________
1983 300D-Turbo - Deep Blue w Palomino MB Tex (total loss in fire 1/5/09 RIP)
1995 E320 W124 Polar White/Grey Mushroom MB Tex
2005 F150 Supercrew - Arizona Beige - Lear topper
1985 Piaggio Vespa T5 - Black and Chrome

www.cphilip.com
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:19 PM
Tradesman with2MB diesels
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hickory hills il.
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Are you sure your 97 hasn't developed a fuel leak? If the mileage drop is due to the fuel you should have noticed it in both cars.
Diesel Addict, fuel leak was my first thought and i went over thoroughly. Its dryer than a baptist picnic at the i/p and any other suspect areas. It is parked inside almost each night and there is no smell of diesel in the closed garage in the morning.
I dont know if we are still getting winter blend here. Mpg's may improve when summer fuel arrives. We will find out. Jim
__________________
1997 E300D Wife's daily driver
1985 300SD my daily driver
1999 Expedition family road trip and material hauler
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
What about the injectors? There could be an external leak (under the black plastic cover) or one or more injectors could be spraying poorly which would definitely drop your mileage. Doing a Diesel Purge probably wouldn't hurt.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 5,440
I got 33 MPG in the 300SDL going from FL to PA on Diesel fuel I bought on the road. I don't know if it was ULSD or not. That's the best I ever got, usually averages ~ 30MPG.

BTW, I use used engine oil as a fuel addititive.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-28-2008, 08:14 PM
mechmagcn's Avatar
Just another diesel junky
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mt Holly AR
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by P.E.Haiges View Post

BTW, I use used engine oil as a fuel addititive.
I'm curious, what ratio are you running? I about to start back running used motor oil in my service trucks, but was hesitant to run it in my MB powered F100.
__________________
1971 R600 Mack toterhome (SuperDawg)
99 NU-WA Snowbird 34+2 SE 102 5er
If it's not diesel, it's not in my stable!
53 F100 617.951/auto
95 Dodge 3500 Cummins/5 speed service truck
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-28-2008, 08:24 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Used engine oil is a very bad thing to use as an additive. The sub-10 micron metal particles (which are small enough to pass through the fuel filter) will damage the pump.

If you want to burn engine oil, use new oil.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-28-2008, 08:29 PM
Ara T.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,075
Cue "I've been burning liquified dog doodoo for 20 years without any problems!"
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-28-2008, 11:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 467
thanks for the lol moment
__________________
'83 SD, 2x '85 SD
You are entitled to your own opinions, you are not entitled to your own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-29-2008, 10:09 AM
gsxr's Avatar
Unbanned...?
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 8,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
If you want to burn engine oil, use new oil.
Agreed. Don't burn used engine oil in any engine you care about. It's fine for a "junker" motor in your $500 beater, though. Even ATF isn't a good idea... ash deposits, etc... stick to normal additives if you need them (Red Line, Stanadyne, Power Service, etc).

Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-29-2008, 01:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Yeah, if you insist on burning oil, get some new, ashless 2-cycle motor oil. Regular oil, especially used oil, has things in it that are not meant to be burned.

__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page