|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Stainless Steel Airbox for direct air intake kit
Here is this airbox that I came up with for my intake kit that is sold in the classified section. It's stainless.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I thought you found a new use for a 603 trap oxidizer
Sixto 87 300D |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Looks good. Why didn't you add a nipple for the oil trap hose to connect to?
Any idea what you'll charge for it? How about both as a kit?
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel Silver blue paint over navy blue interior 2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise 99% original unmolested car ~210k miles on the clock 1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion 152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thats a small airfilter.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not quite sure why you would want to restrict the airflow through the smaller opening? Seems like the device would create more turbulance and turbo-lag. How does it perform?
__________________
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...aman/Fleet.jpg Peach Parts W124.128 User Group. 80 280SL 85 300SD 87 300TD 92 300D 2.5 Turbo 92 300TE 4Matic |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Assuming the tube is 3" then it looks like a standard 6"x5"x6" to me (6" base dia, 5" end dia, and 6" high).
If it is the closed top type, it will have approximately 100-105 square inches surface area (not counting pleats). For the reverse cone top type, they have about 30 square inches more surface area. Not as much as the stock filter which has about 150 square inches of surface area (again, not counting pleats). On the other hand, it doesn't have to suck air through a piece of sheet metal punched full of holes pressed against its inside surface - like the stock airbox does either. I'd like to see a flow test of this compared to the stock setup.
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel Silver blue paint over navy blue interior 2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise 99% original unmolested car ~210k miles on the clock 1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion 152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
That SS case will be heavy too, what supports it?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
direct air intake kit stuff
yeh, I'll probably make a custom bracket. I honestly don't think this airbox would improve any engine performance over just having the filter in the engine compartment like I have with the kit that I made, but since some people thought that was an issue I went ahead and made an airbox to test this principle. I'll let you know what the verdict is. I guess if people really wanted something like this with the kit I could make them, but again I'm not sure it's necessary.
p.s. the conical side diameter is the same as the o.e.m. plastic black tube coming from the air collector (see first picture to the left). The purpose of that is to connect right to the air collector to make this a true "cold air intake". Again the fresh air intake side of this airbox is no more restrictive than stock. After the filter the air goes directly into the turbo rather than the mess of the original. Plus it's not an old, rattle rust box that takes up 30% of your engine compartment. Last edited by dieselkid; 06-14-2008 at 08:40 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Nice workmanship, but it still seems to be a solution without a problem.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
His hobby appears to be metal fabrication. If I knew how to do that, I'd probably replace every sheet metal part of my car with something custom just because I could.
__________________
1983 Mercedes-Benz 240D Automatic, A/C, Power Sunroof, Power Right Side Mirror 231K Miles FOR SALE MAKE OFFER |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
If you keep the car long enough and this replaces the ridiculously designed MB air filter bracket, ya might save some money. Yours certainly looks much nicer.
__________________
84 300DT Puke Yellow. Totalled after 438,000 84 300DT Orient Red. 169,000 (actual mileage may vary) 2002 Explorer EB (wife's) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
That filter looks to have more surface area than the GM 3.8 filter.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver 1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver 1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
It would be far cheaper just to reinforce the braket by welding rods on the underside of the weak points.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Actually, it's cheaper to just replace the bracket once every 20 years, maybe.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
looks good, I applaud most people who see a so-so design and believe they can improve upon it.
the issue I'm having is the vibration of the engine is stressing the rubber joints, my filter is hardmounted above the a/c thingie, I'm considering cutting the steel inlet tube between the filter and the turbo inlet and adding another rubber joint, allowing it to flex a bit more. good luck and keep modding.
__________________
Cheers, Robert |
Bookmarks |
|
|