Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2009, 10:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 201
Uh-oh...I think I've got big problems here - 73 220D

After getting my cylinder head rebuilt, I installed it and had trouble setting the timing (see my earlier thread). Well to facilitate getting it right I removed the cam followers again (so all the valves stay closed and I can easily rotate the camshaft) and the engine is still hitting something at both TDC no.1, and if i turn it halfway around it jams at TDC No. 2. With all the valves closed, the only thing I can think of is that they milled the head too much and / or didn't reseat the valves sufficiently. The machine shop was recommended by the Mercedes shop I usually go to, so they ought to know what they are doing. But I can't think of any other reason for this interference.

Even if this problem were fixed, what about the prechambers? will they hit the top of the piston? (they're the old flat kind).
__________________
kalpol
79 280SE
82 Fiat Spider 2000
81 Fiat Brava
04 BMW R1150RT
96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:03 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
if they milled the head and did not compensate on the PC height with some kind of spacer of stacked washer it certainly could be an issue as well.

All of the limits for milling the head should have been available to them. It seems like a really stupid mess-up. Both of your theories are spot-on.

I can only guess that maybe the head gaskets are not the same thickness as the FSM numbers were once based on.

you can test to see what is hitting by returning the engine to where it binds up and then pressing down on the valves to search for the piston head.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:04 AM
Registered Hack
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,642
also.. make sure it isn't something else that is binding... like a vacuum pump or chain rail.


I would think you would know the difference... just keep it in mind
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:22 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 56,292
When you sent the Head to them were the Pre-Combustion chambers still in the head.
If not the Rebuilder would have had no way to check the protrusion.
If the other things suggested do not free up the Engine you may have to pull the Chambers to see if it frees up the Engine.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel911 View Post
When you sent the Head to them were the Pre-Combustion chambers still in the head.
If not the Rebuilder would have had no way to check the protrusion.
If the other things suggested do not free up the Engine you may have to pull the Chambers to see if it frees up the Engine.
Prechambers aren't installed at the moment, but yeah I may have a small problem there since I didn't have the chambers in the head when I sent it. But I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.
__________________
kalpol
79 280SE
82 Fiat Spider 2000
81 Fiat Brava
04 BMW R1150RT
96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:47 PM
83240D
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I had a similar problem with my 98 Land Rover, I had purchased it for a low price knowing it had a blown head gasket. I took the heads off, made sure all the cylender liners were flat with the deck (all aluminum V8) and sent the heads in to be re-surfaced. The guy then calls me and says "Well... I found about .009 of warpage in your heads, so I milled of .010
I was furious, The max spec for a land rover is .008, and that is MAX. But I didnt have time to fool around so I paid the guy, and bit the bullet, got home, tried installing them, and like yours, contact lock, I then took them off. I then did some searching and found some head gaskets called composite head gaskets, that were stated to be designed for engines milled from .010-.015, They are a little thicker, to compensate for an accidental, or even intentional over sized resurface. I put it back together with the new gaskets, no more contact lock. Finished putting it back together, started her up and ran fine, no knocks, pings, or any noises for that matter. That was a year ago. It is still kicking ass, you know, I even feel that it has more power than before, maybe because the elimination of the blown head gasket, or a slightly increase compression ratio, I dunno. But that is what fixed my LR
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-07-2009, 12:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by 83240D View Post
I had a similar problem with my 98 Land Rover, I had purchased it for a low price knowing it had a blown head gasket. I took the heads off, made sure all the cylender liners were flat with the deck (all aluminum V8) and sent the heads in to be re-surfaced. The guy then calls me and says "Well... I found about .009 of warpage in your heads, so I milled of .010
I was furious, The max spec for a land rover is .008, and that is MAX. But I didnt have time to fool around so I paid the guy, and bit the bullet, got home, tried installing them, and like yours, contact lock, I then took them off. I then did some searching and found some head gaskets called composite head gaskets, that were stated to be designed for engines milled from .010-.015, They are a little thicker, to compensate for an accidental, or even intentional over sized resurface. I put it back together with the new gaskets, no more contact lock. Finished putting it back together, started her up and ran fine, no knocks, pings, or any noises for that matter. That was a year ago. It is still kicking ass, you know, I even feel that it has more power than before, maybe because the elimination of the blown head gasket, or a slightly increase compression ratio, I dunno. But that is what fixed my LR
I guess I'm gonna have to bite the bullet and take the head back off and see what is hitting what...hopefully there will be witness marks.
__________________
kalpol
79 280SE
82 Fiat Spider 2000
81 Fiat Brava
04 BMW R1150RT
96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2009, 03:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 201
Worse

I took the head back off and examined things - I had looked at the head of course before I put it on, and all still looks OK there. What I did notice this time was that (since i ignored timing this go-around) the nos 2 and 3 pistons rise slightly above the cylinder head at the BDC mark, while the Nos. 1 and 4 never quite reach that level at TDC. I can't figure out why the lock occurs at No. 1 TDC but it's pretty obvious that the lock just before the BDC mark occurs as the pistons are hitting the head as they try to rise above the deck.

So it looks to me like I'm screwed with bent rods or something. I never turned the engine over till now with the head off for fear of losing timing, and while I noticed No.1 was slightly below the deck I attributed that to the chain stretch.

The head was just fine when I took it off - no evidence of contact and the valves are all OK (the stems were coked heavily and they were sticking open just a tad, so no compression for starting, plus the head gasket was blown). I can't figure out, if something bent rods, how it happened, and how it's so uniform with 1 and 4 matching and 2 and 3 matching.
__________________
kalpol
79 280SE
82 Fiat Spider 2000
81 Fiat Brava
04 BMW R1150RT
96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-09-2009, 07:23 PM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,285
source or web site requested if available

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83240D View Post
I had a similar problem with my 98 Land Rover, I had purchased it for a low price knowing it had a blown head gasket. I then did some searching and found some head gaskets called composite head gaskets, that were stated to be designed for engines milled from .010-.015, They are a little thicker, to compensate for an accidental, or even intentional over sized resurface. I put it back together with the new gaskets, no more contact lock.
Got a source or web site?
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2009, 12:47 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 56,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalpol View Post
Prechambers aren't installed at the moment, but yeah I may have a small problem there since I didn't have the chambers in the head when I sent it. But I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.

I am not sure about your year but on the 84 300D the Pre-combustion Chamber protrusion is checked while the Cylinder Head is off of the Engine.
Also do you have the Factory Service Manual to work from?
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2009, 07:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: northwest
Posts: 88
how curious about the pistons peaking above the deck... can connecting rods stretch?? like that?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-09-2009, 02:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 311
You haven't mentioned going back to the machine shop and asking them what's happening. Have you talked to them about it?
Steve
__________________
1980 300 TD

1997 Dodge Pickup/Cummins 5.9 12-valve
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-09-2009, 02:35 AM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 56,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarencethecool View Post
how curious about the pistons peaking above the deck... can connecting rods stretch?? like that?
I was wondering if the Block might be warped.
Bent Crank?
The parts site I looked at said the engine was a 615.

I tried to look up how much above the block the pistons are allowed to go but my CD does not have his Engine on it.
On the other Engines there is a spec for how much the Valves are allowed to protrude from the Cylinder head.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2009, 11:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 201
Puzzling...

I turned the engine (backwards) to the first lock, which is about TDC +5-7 degrees, and the No. 1 and No. 4 valves all depressed about a quarter inch (just guessing) before they hit the piston. I turned it forward around 180 degrees to the other lock (just before the BDC mark on the crank) and Nos. 2 and 3 did the same. So I am slightly encouraged since the pistons aren't pinning the valves closed, but mightily puzzled.

The engine cranked fine before I took the head off (albeit without compression due to blown gasket).

It locks hard too, just like a contact lock, with freedom to move back (although I haven't made a huge effort to lock it). I can't see how a chain rail would cause any trouble, and surely it's not the vacuum pump suddenly failing while sitting still. I can't think of any other projections in the head that would be contacting anything (nothing is installed). The camshaft is free, and the accessories turn just fine. I guess I can remove the vacuum pump and try it, if that's my only other option other than taking the head off again.
__________________
kalpol
79 280SE
82 Fiat Spider 2000
81 Fiat Brava
04 BMW R1150RT
96 Jeep Grand Cherokee

Last edited by kalpol; 03-07-2009 at 11:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-07-2009, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
I would not suspect bent rods as the first thing to look at.
Chain stretch would not affect the height the piston achieves in the block.
As far as all the reading I have done in the FSM... it is not acceptable to turn the crank backwards as far as you indicated you did. So would suggest not doing that again after you get everything back together.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page