Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2009, 06:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern VT
Posts: 537
installing a 'new' flywheel to the 617.

If I was to take a flywheel, crankshaft, pistons, connecting rods to a machine shop, would they be able to balance the whole assembly.. even if it was a flywheel from say a small block chevy.. ?

I am looking for a larger clutch surface area.. would this be one way to achieve that? and or do both flywheels need to weight aprox the same amount?

anyone have a suggestion as to what flywheel to use.. I am wanting an 10 or 11 inch clutch disk..

__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon

84 300TDT daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:21 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
You'll need a bigger bell housing as well. The flywheel if lighter will allow the natural imbalance of the inline five cylinder engine to cause a lot more shaking.

Why do you need a bigger clutch?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern VT
Posts: 537
I want to put one in an old dodge truck... and I am thinking that the stock sized clutch is on the small side.. Plus it would be easier to swap a flywheel, clutch disk, pressure plate, and transmission all at once... IF there was a flywheel that would work..

so heavier is better? How about the balancing of the rotating assembly does it matter so much in that respect?
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon

84 300TDT daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-08-2009, 07:51 PM
lutzTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lutz, Florida (N of Tampa)
Posts: 2,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmills View Post
I want to put one in an old dodge truck... and I am thinking that the stock sized clutch is on the small side.. Plus it would be easier to swap a flywheel, clutch disk, pressure plate, and transmission all at once... IF there was a flywheel that would work..

so heavier is better? How about the balancing of the rotating assembly does it matter so much in that respect?

not sure what trans your planning on, but as far as the flywhell question. yes, the machine shaop should balance the rotating assembly including the flywheel. have them take it closer to a race balance of 5 grams or less

you should try to use a heavy flywheel too, the stock 617 flywheel weighs 38 pounds, but the true working measurement is the moment of inertia. you can get away with a lighter one if it is a bigger diameter with weight at the rim, giving it a bigger moment of inertia simply due to its distance to center
__________________

1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale
2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold
2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably)
1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast)
1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style)
2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern VT
Posts: 537
I am not certain about what transmission to use as of yet.. would like to keep the first gear ratio fairly low.. and still have the option for O/D... I heard that the NV3550 is pretty robust for its size and weight.. although it only has about a 4.00 first gear if I remember correctly.. and I think originally the truck had about a 6.00 first gear..

and maybe a deep first gear would be more useful than OD, in the long run..

38 LBS is kinda heavy sounding.. maybe a flywheel for an 11 inch clutch would be better.. I am still in the deep end of the learning curve here. During the walk today, the idea popped up that I could have the whole rotating assembly balanced.. which opened up the thinking that maybe it could be done..
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon

84 300TDT daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2009, 08:16 PM
lutzTD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lutz, Florida (N of Tampa)
Posts: 2,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDmills View Post
I am not certain about what transmission to use as of yet.. would like to keep the first gear ratio fairly low.. and still have the option for O/D... I heard that the NV3550 is pretty robust for its size and weight.. although it only has about a 4.00 first gear if I remember correctly.. and I think originally the truck had about a 6.00 first gear..

and maybe a deep first gear would be more useful than OD, in the long run..

38 LBS is kinda heavy sounding.. maybe a flywheel for an 11 inch clutch would be better.. I am still in the deep end of the learning curve here. During the walk today, the idea popped up that I could have the whole rotating assembly balanced.. which opened up the thinking that maybe it could be done..
my take is you will have a bit of trouble mating the NV3550 to the 617. there has been talk of an adapter, but none have appeared im aware of. the flywheel weight is needed on the 617 to smooth out the 5 cylinder, and to allow it to maintain RPM between shifts. the 240D flywheel is 28 pounds, and has a annoying drop in RPM between shifts, I also believe but have not proven to myself, the heavier flywheel will help with low RPM torque vibration when lugging the motor
__________________

1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale
2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold
2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably)
1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast)
1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style)
2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jeffersonville, IN
Posts: 92
dodge swaps

look at the mercedes 617 thread of 4btswaps.com, there are a lot of people doing this and many of them are there. I believe they have determined the 617 is internally balanced, so the flywheel is round, but the expert is there, not me. If your rear end ratio is high enough to use the high rpm of the mercedes effectively, you shouldn't need a bigger clutch. I'm going to use 4.1 or 4.27:1 in my ford f150, but 9" ford rear ends have drag gears available that go all the way to 5.6:1. I'm going to use the mercedes 722 auto transmission and buy a spicer adapter for the driveshaft end. See cell's thread on this site about that.
__________________
'80 240D biege "Mercey Bird"
'80 240D light blue "Slug"
'80 300SD dark blue "Theodin"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-08-2009, 10:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern VT
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndianaJo View Post
look at the mercedes 617 thread of 4btswaps.com, there are a lot of people doing this and many of them are there. I believe they have determined the 617 is internally balanced, so the flywheel is round, but the expert is there, not me. If your rear end ratio is high enough to use the high rpm of the mercedes effectively, you shouldn't need a bigger clutch. I'm going to use 4.1 or 4.27:1 in my ford f150, but 9" ford rear ends have drag gears available that go all the way to 5.6:1. I'm going to use the mercedes 722 auto transmission and buy a spicer adapter for the driveshaft end. See cell's thread on this site about that.
Thanks for the suggestion to visit 4btswaps, I will look it up..
I thought about using the stock 4 speed manual initially, and still may do it.. but would like have more of truck transmission in place.. and a nv3550 seems like it is a nice light relatively robust unit... the stock dodge rear gear is a 5.83 to 1.. so maybe I can get away with 4 speed manual for a while..
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon

84 300TDT daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-09-2009, 06:39 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
I'd recommend using some variation of a stock merecedes fw and clutch. I don't see any reason to adapt something there and face starter interface problems. adapting the tranny to the bell housing will be tricky enough.

I'd probably use a mb tranny too depending on the application.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-09-2009, 06:51 AM
lowriderdog37's Avatar
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Viera, FL
Posts: 665
For the power that your 617 will be putting out, the stock flywheel should be fine. The guys around here have been able to do many performance mods and are still able to use the stock clutch.
__________________
My Primary Driver - '85 300CD - 4-speed conversion, 2.47 rear, lowered, euro headlights, rebuilding (not restoring so much)

Wife's - '08 Saab Sportcombi Aero

Riding a '03 Yamaha Warrior
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern VT
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
I'd recommend using some variation of a stock merecedes fw and clutch. I don't see any reason to adapt something there and face starter interface problems. adapting the tranny to the bell housing will be tricky enough.

I'd probably use a mb tranny too depending on the application.
Ok.. this sounds like a better idea.. keeping it simple may be the smartest way to go.

__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon

84 300TDT daily driver
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page