|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
installing a 'new' flywheel to the 617.
If I was to take a flywheel, crankshaft, pistons, connecting rods to a machine shop, would they be able to balance the whole assembly.. even if it was a flywheel from say a small block chevy.. ?
I am looking for a larger clutch surface area.. would this be one way to achieve that? and or do both flywheels need to weight aprox the same amount? anyone have a suggestion as to what flywheel to use.. I am wanting an 10 or 11 inch clutch disk..
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon 84 300TDT daily driver |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You'll need a bigger bell housing as well. The flywheel if lighter will allow the natural imbalance of the inline five cylinder engine to cause a lot more shaking.
Why do you need a bigger clutch?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I want to put one in an old dodge truck... and I am thinking that the stock sized clutch is on the small side.. Plus it would be easier to swap a flywheel, clutch disk, pressure plate, and transmission all at once... IF there was a flywheel that would work..
so heavier is better? How about the balancing of the rotating assembly does it matter so much in that respect?
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon 84 300TDT daily driver |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
not sure what trans your planning on, but as far as the flywhell question. yes, the machine shaop should balance the rotating assembly including the flywheel. have them take it closer to a race balance of 5 grams or less you should try to use a heavy flywheel too, the stock 617 flywheel weighs 38 pounds, but the true working measurement is the moment of inertia. you can get away with a lighter one if it is a bigger diameter with weight at the rim, giving it a bigger moment of inertia simply due to its distance to center
__________________
1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale 2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold 2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably) 1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast) 1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style) 2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I am not certain about what transmission to use as of yet.. would like to keep the first gear ratio fairly low.. and still have the option for O/D... I heard that the NV3550 is pretty robust for its size and weight.. although it only has about a 4.00 first gear if I remember correctly.. and I think originally the truck had about a 6.00 first gear..
and maybe a deep first gear would be more useful than OD, in the long run.. 38 LBS is kinda heavy sounding.. maybe a flywheel for an 11 inch clutch would be better.. I am still in the deep end of the learning curve here. During the walk today, the idea popped up that I could have the whole rotating assembly balanced.. which opened up the thinking that maybe it could be done..
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon 84 300TDT daily driver |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
1982 300CD Turbo (Otis, "ups & downs") parts for sale 2003 TJ with Hemi (to go anywhere, quickly) sold 2001 Excursion Powerstroke (to go dependably) 1970 Mustang 428SCJ (to go fast) 1962 Corvette LS1 (to go in style) 2001 Schwinn Grape Krate 10spd (if all else fails) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
dodge swaps
look at the mercedes 617 thread of 4btswaps.com, there are a lot of people doing this and many of them are there. I believe they have determined the 617 is internally balanced, so the flywheel is round, but the expert is there, not me. If your rear end ratio is high enough to use the high rpm of the mercedes effectively, you shouldn't need a bigger clutch. I'm going to use 4.1 or 4.27:1 in my ford f150, but 9" ford rear ends have drag gears available that go all the way to 5.6:1. I'm going to use the mercedes 722 auto transmission and buy a spicer adapter for the driveshaft end. See cell's thread on this site about that.
__________________
'80 240D biege "Mercey Bird" '80 240D light blue "Slug" '80 300SD dark blue "Theodin" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I thought about using the stock 4 speed manual initially, and still may do it.. but would like have more of truck transmission in place.. and a nv3550 seems like it is a nice light relatively robust unit... the stock dodge rear gear is a 5.83 to 1.. so maybe I can get away with 4 speed manual for a while..
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon 84 300TDT daily driver |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I'd recommend using some variation of a stock merecedes fw and clutch. I don't see any reason to adapt something there and face starter interface problems. adapting the tranny to the bell housing will be tricky enough.
I'd probably use a mb tranny too depending on the application.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
For the power that your 617 will be putting out, the stock flywheel should be fine. The guys around here have been able to do many performance mods and are still able to use the stock clutch.
__________________
My Primary Driver - '85 300CD - 4-speed conversion, 2.47 rear, lowered, euro headlights, rebuilding (not restoring so much) Wife's - '08 Saab Sportcombi Aero Riding a '03 Yamaha Warrior |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
46 WDX Power Wagon 84 300TDT daily driver |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|