![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trying to learn about crankcase ventilation.
Good morning.
I had some time to look around my engine compartment this weekend, trying to learn more about the design of these diesels. One of the things I did was to take the air filter housing off of the turbo, to learn more about the layout of those components. My interpretation of what I saw is that the "oil handler" at the center of the air filter housing has a way to divert the oil component of crankcase gasses both down the oil drain tube that returns to the oil pan (as I understand at this point), but also back into the turbo. In other words, what is being sent into the turbo via the short black pipe that exits the "oil handler" at the center of the air filter housing. The uneducated person (me) might think there was some "advantage" to increased "blow-by", as there is continuity between the crankcase and the tubo underneath the lid of the air filter housing; more "blow-by" just sends more air into the turbo via this device at the center of the filter housing. Thanks for entertaining my questions.
__________________
1982 300cd, 140k miles |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Only oil goes through the oil return line (sometimes gases goes through the oil return pipe), and the vent gases goes through the short black pipe and sends back into the intake, on a diesel car the crankcase gases goes into the intake voluntarly meaning there is not form of vacuume helping it to suck the gas in. some one told me there is a slight benifit in letting the crankcase vent into the intake (please correct me if i am wrong)
__________________
Current Garage 2008 Mercedes GL320 CDI 188k mi Repair/Work in progress 1994 S350 160k mi Garage Queen & prepping for repairs 2005 E320 CDI 203k mi Healthy & Daily Driver 1994 S350 357k mi Retried as parts car 1984 300TD 214k mi Blown OM617 Poss OM603 Swap?? Sold 1987 300SDL 200K+ 1994 S320 181K mi 2008 E320 Bluetec 127k mi 1999 S420 130K mi 1980 240D 360k mi 15+ Others that has come, stay and gone GONE, BUT NOT FORGOTTEN ![]() 1995 E320 SE 220k mi 1984 300SD 350k mi |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
On my car, there is an oil separator built into the valve cover, takes the heavier droplets out of the crankcase gasses... gasses that come up from the bottom end (blow-by) up through the oil duct work in the head and chain cover. These gasses are routed via black plastic tube to the intake side of the turbo. No need to send gasses through the air filter again.. it's filtered air. Albeit oily filtered air. This is one reason why the air intake tubing and manifold gets oily inside. The other reason is EGR exhaust gas return, if you have that / still hooked up. EGR returns burned gasses into the mix again through air intake, and I think is a much worse contributor to gunked up intakes than PCV. Positive Crankcase Ventilation.. positive for a reason.. it's under pressure because blow-by is forceful. Doesn't matter that a diesel creates no meaningful level of vacuum in the intake... the crankcase gasses are being pushed, and the intake is sucking some serious air... it's all going back into the cylinders. If you prevent PCV from going down its tube, you risk blowing out a valve cover gasket or some other gasket/s so let it "breathe".
__________________
Cheers! Scott McPhee 1987 300D |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
MB used different kinds of Positive Crankcase Ventilation systems. On the early turbo SD's the valve cover is vented directly into the turbo air intake pipe so any oil in the air is fed thru the turbo back into the intake manifold. A later design was the oil separator in the air filter. This allows the oil in the blowby to drain back into the oil pan and the smoky air gets sucked back into the turbo intake.
In your design, I believe no oil is fed back into the turbo thru the PCV system. The oil goes back to the pan and the air back into the intake.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08 1985 300TD 185k+ 1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03 1985 409d 65k--sold 06 1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car 1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11 1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper 1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4 1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Some years of 240D have a butterfly between the air cleaner and intake manifold. This puts the manifold and crankcase under vacuum.
__________________
CC: NSA All things are burning, know this and be released. 82 Benz 240 D, Kuan Yin 12 Ford Escape 4wd You're four times It's hard to more likely to concentrate on have an accident two things when you're on at the same time. a cell phone. www.kiva.org It's not like there's anything wrong with feeling good, is there? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I kinda wonder why this general approach is not commonly done to get rid of the vacuum pump on the diesel engine, you know, to supply vacuum for brakes and all the extra plumbing that runs on vacuum tubing?
__________________
Cheers! Scott McPhee 1987 300D |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So the Vacuum is needed to operate the IP.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A vacuum pump is far more efficient than a throttle.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Not on 81-83 240D models. Its used to force exhaust through the EGR.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
FI do you have any more info on the 240D vaccum/fuel system? Or links to some?
My buddie has an iirc 84 but might be older, that i need to get running for him. It has a throttle blade.
__________________
87' 300D, Currently undergoing an OM606 swap/build! ![]() 03' 2500HD Dmax + goodies! 82' 300SD, parting out! 93' 300TE 4matic, parting out! 83' 240D Project Cheap Drive 89' 300E, parting out! 74' Datsun 510 wagon ![]() 88' RX7 10thAE, 13B track car build soon Skippy~ As for perception: Drive what you like and can afford. Those who don't like it can supply vacuum to one of your components. LOL ![]() If you need parts, I have some! |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the replies.
Kerry, at my basic level of understanding, your explanation helps me the most. So that "device"/oil separator (that I was tempted to disassemble but did not) that rests in the center of the air filter housing has the ability to send "blow-by" oil back to the oil pan pathway, and "blow-by" air/gasses back into the turbo. I wonder how it separates the two; by the density of oil vs. air? I read alot about "blow-by" (none, a little, a lot, indicates wear, doesn't matter, etc.). It almost seems like "the system" was designed to account for blow-by, separate its components (oil and air), and return them to appropriate places by separate pathways. Thanks.
__________________
1982 300cd, 140k miles |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|