Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 11
1985 300D Compression Test Results

I am looking at a 1985 300D Turbo with about 160 k on the odometer. The car is in really good shape overall with a ton of maintenance records. Runs well, no smoke to speak of, but I had a compression test done some insight into the engine. Here are the numbers:

310
320
225 on the #3
340
260

The valves were not adjusted at the time of the test, but had been adjusted a couple thousand miles ago.

This difference is more than what I have read is recommended, but is their life in this engine? Would it be wise to walk away? Any advice?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:26 PM
oldsinner111's Avatar
lied to for years
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 6,249
Run.Must have been lady driven.
__________________
1999 w140, quit voting to old, and to old to fight, a god damned veteran
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:26 PM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Do a leak down test on #3.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:28 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here's the thing! Yes, the engine needs work. The questions back to you; how much oil does it use? Are you getting the car REALLY cheap? How will you be using the car? How well does it run? How easy does it start when COLD?

The first question will be the toughest to answer. Unless you drive the car for a few weeks, you will have to take the word of the seller who may not even know, and if he does will he tell you the truth?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 11
The current owner says it burns about 1 quart between oil changes, changing the oil about every 5000 miles. The car seems to run well, smooth idle, but it's hard to really say based on a test drive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 11
I would be using the car on a regular basis, ideally even daily. The seller was asking $3000 before the compression test, but I'm sure will come down in price. Aside from the engine though, all windows and the sunroof work, antenna works, locks work, and on and on. The owner says that when it is cold (20-30) he uses the block heater and it cranks right up, but without the block heater it struggles. As far as really cold, no idea (we don't have real cold down here)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2009, 05:18 PM
b2948kevin's Avatar
The Dragon Slayer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 97
You might try adding some Xado from Xadousa.com. I'm not affiliated, but their case studies are pretty compelling.

Good luck!
__________________
84 300td (Yes, a wagon)
"The Golden Dragon"
195k, 2nd owner
Lives in Redmond, WA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:58 PM
ImBroke's Avatar
Diesel way of Life
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cleveland, NY
Posts: 2,230
definitely a leakdown test is in order, I'd do 5 too. With only 160k, I'd suspect a broken odometer, or something. I would say I better compression at 285k, but since I'm not the original owner, I don't know if my engine has ever been changed.
__________________
79 MB 280 SEL Euro 133k
77 MB 450SL 154k
05 Mustang GT Vert (3) 104k
12 TSX Wagon Tech (66k) (192k)
06 Subaru Outback base (135k) 164k
16 Acura MDX (109k) 111k
18 Silverado 2500 LTZ Midnight (212) 56k
97 Ford Ranger 163k
11 RAV4 154k
01 Escape 173k
04 Honda Pilot 292k
1967 Mustang (Resto Project)
1968 Mustang (Parts Bin)
00 Ford Ranger 124k
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North central Texas
Posts: 2,596
I say buy it

If it runs well, buy it and devote attention to the things that might let you down... belts, hoses, timing chain, tires.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 272
The car will continue to run good. Probably burns more than 1 quart in 3000 miles and expect the car to struggle to start below 40 degrees.
__________________
1983 300 Turbo-"Nora"
1983 240D Auto "Lucia"-slowest on earth-1st love
1985 300 Turbo-Blue Goose-slowly plucking parts

http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o...ly15/mbsig.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
3 and 5 are unacceptable. Was the test done cold or hot? I'd do a leakdown test on those cylinders and a wet test.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:32 PM
ImBroke's Avatar
Diesel way of Life
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cleveland, NY
Posts: 2,230
Cali has one cylinder with low compression, starts quickly and runs good. However, when it's cold, it has a bad shake from running on 4 cylinders. If it runs fine, I'd say buy it and drive it.
__________________
79 MB 280 SEL Euro 133k
77 MB 450SL 154k
05 Mustang GT Vert (3) 104k
12 TSX Wagon Tech (66k) (192k)
06 Subaru Outback base (135k) 164k
16 Acura MDX (109k) 111k
18 Silverado 2500 LTZ Midnight (212) 56k
97 Ford Ranger 163k
11 RAV4 154k
01 Escape 173k
04 Honda Pilot 292k
1967 Mustang (Resto Project)
1968 Mustang (Parts Bin)
00 Ford Ranger 124k
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 11
The test was done by an MB mechanic, so I would guess the test was done hot. He did not do a leakdown test or a wet test. The owner again said he has not had an issue with the car not wanting to start, and in cold weather it starts fine with the heater.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,156
how much is the seller asking?

Whatever he asks drill him down at least a grand just because of the potential repair needed on the engine. Any good tech or smart mechanic would do a leak down and wet test with the reading on clyinder #3.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 211K,Dealership serviced its whole life
1991 190E 2.6(120k)
1983 300D(300k)
1977 300D(211k)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Engine shouldn't need a heater at 20 or 30 degrees. It should start the same as it does at 60 or 70 degrees. At least mine always have.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page