Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-08-2009, 08:07 PM
Yak Yak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,711
I've searched the forum and looked at the W123 wheel pics and I can't decide if my car is abnormally high, or just looks that way to me. Some of the pics in the 123 wheels thread have a similarly large fender gap, but according to the specs, my car is more than 1.5 inches too high. My pics lack some perspective and appear even worse than it looks with the whole car in view.

I've got the stock "short" spring for the coupe with the red bottom coil. Everything else is as stock as can be. Goodyear 195/70-14's on Bundt's. 16.5 inches from wheel center to fender lip, 31.75 at hood and fender.
The FSM says to "Check level at front axle 40-300" Does anyone have the portion of the FSM that includes chapter 40 above job # 113? Mine stops at 113.

What am I missing to get the car back to it's stock height? My last best-guess effort will be to loosen the UCA, LCA and torsion bar bolts and see if it'll settle. I did that when I installed them thought, so I don't have much hope that will do much.

I still haven't got it aligned and I'd like to get the height sorted out before alignment. If I can't sort it myself, I plan on leaving it to the dealer.

Attached Thumbnails
What is the stock w123 ride height?-wheel1.jpg   What is the stock w123 ride height?-wheel2.jpg   What is the stock w123 ride height?-wheel3.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-08-2009, 08:57 PM
katchung's Avatar
The Love Doctor
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northeast
Posts: 93
my 82 300cd seems to be about a half inch to an inch high in the rear...haven't checked the front yet. Funny, because I was just thinking about this today...wondering if my springs were tired...guess not.
__________________
1982 300cd 245K miles and still goin'...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-08-2009, 09:19 PM
Brandon_SLC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: High on a mountainside, near Salt Lake City.
Posts: 557
That doesn't look right. They do sit high by todays standards, but not that high. Somethings got to be wrong.

But looks great for offroading!
__________________
1979 240D, 4spd manual, Power Sunroof, manual windows, 147k miles, Pastel gray/Black MB Tex.
1991 300D 2.5 - Smokes like it's on Crack!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-09-2009, 01:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
YAK, you said you have the stock front 4 nub pads.

I replaced my front springs on the 85 300D with 240D front springs. this is after the 4-spd swap, and the car had this nose high stance.

The 240 had 3 nubs, but when I removed the 300D pads, they are one nub`s. so I left the one nubs on and it looks good. maybe the CD`s are set up different.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-09-2009, 01:55 AM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yak View Post
I've searched the forum and looked at the W123 wheel pics and I can't decide if my car is abnormally high, or just looks that way to me. Some of the pics in the 123 wheels thread have a similarly large fender gap, but according to the specs, my car is more than 1.5 inches too high. My pics lack some perspective and appear even worse than it looks with the whole car in view.

I've got the stock "short" spring for the coupe with the red bottom coil. Everything else is as stock as can be. Goodyear 195/70-14's on Bundt's. 16.5 inches from wheel center to fender lip, 31.75 at hood and fender.
The FSM says to "Check level at front axle 40-300" Does anyone have the portion of the FSM that includes chapter 40 above job # 113? Mine stops at 113.

What am I missing to get the car back to it's stock height? My last best-guess effort will be to loosen the UCA, LCA and torsion bar bolts and see if it'll settle. I did that when I installed them thought, so I don't have much hope that will do much.

I still haven't got it aligned and I'd like to get the height sorted out before alignment. If I can't sort it myself, I plan on leaving it to the dealer.
An alignment would probably fix the front camber, which might make it look too high. I've had that problem before and the tire shoulders were wearing out too soon. Had new tires installed, alignment done and all was well. This was how my car stood around that time with stock setup after getting new tires and the alignment (2 nub in front):



After getting the 15" Bundts and new Michelins (205/60/15), but still with 2 nub in front. Not much difference. Now that I travel light without much in the trunk, the rear end sits slightly higher than it is in the image below.



This is TheBenzBar's 300CD with new shocks all around installed and 1 nub in front I think (or 2)



I'm not sure if 4 nub is the standard setup, I think those are for the heavy duty suspension setup or lang (long) version. Mine is stock with 2 nub front pads. The 81 300TD we had before had 1 nub front pads on KYB shocks, but sat lower:

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/legomech/MercedesBenz300TD/June-3-2006/p1010027.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-09-2009, 02:04 AM
Sev's Avatar
Sev Sev is offline
Infractions: 99/99 (999)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon_SLC View Post
That doesn't look right. They do sit high by todays standards, but not that high. Somethings got to be wrong.

But looks great for offroading!
nope that's normal ride height for w123's. that's why i want to lower mine so bad. yeah, same deal with my 190e--when i first got it, it had like four inches of fender gap before i billied it down
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-09-2009, 03:37 PM
Yak Yak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,711
Per the FSM, the only options for the 123.153 were short/long springs. No changes were required for extra equipment. Pre-1982 there were more combinations.

The FSM says 23 mm is the stock pad height for the front spring. EPC says 4 "burls" = 23 mm. The rear pad is 14 mm and that's two "naps". (I don't make up the words, I just repeat what I see written: nub=nap=burl). This is for the "short" spring with the red end. The "long" spring with the blue end uses an 18 mm pad and a 9.5 mm pad (3 and 1 nub/front and rear, respectively.

I'll do a before/during/after pic series with the car in profile.

No one has the book answer on how to measure the height at the front axle?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-09-2009, 09:26 PM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
I happen to have one with a red end, but as I mentioned earlier I have 2 nub/burl/naps on the front spring pads.



Do you have a side photo of your car?

I have another blueprint, but not of the turbo model:

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-09-2009, 11:25 PM
Brandon_SLC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: High on a mountainside, near Salt Lake City.
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sev View Post
nope that's normal ride height for w123's. that's why i want to lower mine so bad. yeah, same deal with my 190e--when i first got it, it had like four inches of fender gap before i billied it down
You're joking? My comment was in reference to the silver/blue car - posted by yak. The other cars in this thread look more normal. But the car in question, is obviously, much higher than normal.
__________________
1979 240D, 4spd manual, Power Sunroof, manual windows, 147k miles, Pastel gray/Black MB Tex.
1991 300D 2.5 - Smokes like it's on Crack!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-10-2009, 02:19 AM
Sev's Avatar
Sev Sev is offline
Infractions: 99/99 (999)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon_SLC View Post
You're joking? My comment was in reference to the silver/blue car - posted by yak. The other cars in this thread look more normal. But the car in question, is obviously, much higher than normal.
joke based on the ridiculous fender gaps i've had on my stock benzes in the past.

mbeige's car. again. i'm going to steal his wheels. not really though. followed by a coupe that has the nicest color i've ever seen on a w123 other than surf blau--what is that color anyway?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-10-2009, 03:09 AM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Did a quick look at Detali.ru with EPC diagrams. It looks like the 300CD (123.153) in turbo form has 4 front spring pad options (1/2/3/4 nubs).



8 A 123 321 13 84 SHIM
AS REQUIRED; NUMBER OF BURLS:
1 (8 MM) 002
8 A 123 321 14 84 SHIM
AS REQUIRED; NUMBER OF BURLS:
2 (13 MM) 002
8 A 123 321 15 84 SHIM
AS REQUIRED; NUMBER OF BURLS:
3 (18 MM) 002
8 A 123 321 16 84 SHIM
AS REQUIRED; NUMBER OF BURLS:
4 (23 MM)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-10-2009, 03:16 AM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBeige View Post
I happen to have one with a red end, but as I mentioned earlier I have 2 nub/burl/naps on the front spring pads.

Hey Patrick,

I was wondering why you had the 2 nub. But now it is clear, you have different springs than mine (got the blue mark). I thought we basically had the same optioned car, different color.

Anycase, when you get a chance I am curious as what the wire size is on your car's coils. You should take some measurements when you get a chance.



.
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System


Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-10-2009, 03:29 AM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeliveryValve View Post
Hey Patrick,

I was wondering why you had the 2 nub. But now it is clear, you have different springs than mine (got the blue mark). I thought we basically had the same optioned car, different color.

Anycase, when you get a chance I am curious as what the wire size is on your car's coils. You should take some measurements when you get a chance.



.
That is interesting Richard. It makes sense though, thinner pads give more room for longer springs. But is ride height affected that much?

Looking at the lovely photos you took of the differential DIY, I have the red marked rear springs. Been a while since I looked at the rear spring pads, but it may be 2 or 1.

So similarly optioned cars can have different suspension setup (in terms of spring and/or pad options). I wonder how to figure that out other than taking a look? I know they can be swapped but it would be nice to determine what should have come with the car when they were new. I don't think the VIN decoder has that info.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-10-2009, 03:37 AM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,159
Yes it would be nice to figure that out.

Another note, I remember you saying you had Bilsteins shocks as originally installed on your car. Mine came with Boge shocks. I wonder if that means anything.
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System


Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-10-2009, 03:44 AM
MBeige's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeliveryValve View Post
Yes it would be nice to figure that out.

Another note, I remember you saying you had Bilsteins shocks as originally installed on your car. Mine came with Boge shocks. I wonder if that means anything.
When my uncle and I replaced the front guide rod mounts, we had to disconnect the shock absorbers. I had a chance to take a good look to realize they were Bilstein, and had the MB logo on them. Probably the originals, and still very strong too.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page