Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,932
Check this out!!! Save 9-15% on fuel

This works on diesel, too.

Go to this link, and click on what is now the 2nd link down (that will change in time). Works with diesel, too......

Don't listen to these guys below, who immediately claim it's snake oil. The video goes over some 16 vehicles, all of which have gotten a 9-14% fuel savings.

http://www.ajc.com/video?bcpid=97471435001&bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAFAsZ1c~,8MkVRvW0DmauKT3uAriKKf2yHzTPz5MP&bclid=1716449804&bctid=980397602001


Last edited by jbach36; 06-07-2011 at 10:17 PM. Reason: Bad comments from others below, who automatically dub it "snake oil"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:03 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
This time they didnt bother to remove the oil from the snake!!!! Just selling the snake !!!
It wont work!!
Save your money !!
The ideal contraption for some one who is desperate !
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:11 PM
scottmcphee's Avatar
1987 w124 300D
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 1,539
Placebo effect, drivers are aware they have a device and change their driving habits. Take the device out after 2 months without telling them, and alas, the savings are still intact!
__________________
Cheers!
Scott McPhee

1987 300D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:14 PM
Crazy_Nate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 567
Does the snake go directly into the tank, or do I put it somewhere else in the car?
__________________
1982 240D, sold 9/17/2008
1987 300D Turbo
W124.133 - 603.960, 722.317 - Smoke Silver Metallic / Medium Red (702/177), acquired 8/15/2009
262,715 and counting
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,932
Did you guys even WATCH the video?????

The Paulding police have already installed them in 6 cars, and the lawn service guy in 10 trucks.

This is not a fluke, that everyone's coming up with a 9-14% savings.

Further, the video tells you in a round-about way, it works by providing the fuel in a more misted way. That's what happens in cars anyways; it puts a mist of fuel in, mixed with air. What this is doing, is putting the fuel in with higher pressure, and less fuel, giving a slightly more efficient mix.

I don't know why this is so hard to believe. Misted gasoline (vapors) is more explosive than liquid gasoline. Makes perfect sense to me, but I'm not an engineer.

Last edited by jbach36; 06-07-2011 at 10:21 PM. Reason: incomplete
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:21 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy_Nate View Post
Does the snake go directly into the tank, or do I put it somewhere else in the car?
Nate,
It looks like you ram one end of the fuel line down its throat & the other fuel line goes .......... never mind!!

End up with one angry snake!!

I wonder if its got magnets in it as well?
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:24 PM
1980sd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Elavil, Ga.
Posts: 910
MB diesels already get 50mpg so there could be a real danger to using one of those things. Size it wrong and it could actually make fuel which could spill into your trunk and back seat...
__________________
My occupational hazard bein'
my occupation's just not around...
1980 300SD
1980 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:27 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbach36 View Post
The Paulding police have already installed them in 6 cars, and the lawn service guy in 10 trucks.

This is not a fluke, that everyone's coming up with a 9-14% savings.

Further, the video tells you in a round-about way, it works by providing the fuel in a more misted way. That's what happens in cars anyways; it puts a mist of fuel in, mixed with air. What this is doing, is putting the fuel in with higher pressure, and less fuel, giving a slightly more efficient mix.

I don't know why this is so hard to believe. Misted gasoline (vapors) is more explosive than liquid gasoline. Makes perfect sense to me, but I'm not an engineer.
A little knowledge can be dangerous. If you mix air with diesel, injectors wont work.
Do you have one of these "snakes"? My guess is there is not much in it.
I wonder how much the inventor paid for the news story?
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2011, 10:33 PM
pelon's Avatar
Up through the hawespipe.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Valencia, NM
Posts: 218
As soon as they showed it was in Texas, I called BULLSHIST and stopped the video.
__________________
1985 300SD
1998 Jetta TDI
Previous: lots of diesel VW's, MB's, KW's, Pete, Freightliner


Walking isn't a lost art: one must, by some means, get to the garage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-08-2011, 12:26 AM
A work in process...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 985
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelon View Post
As soon as they showed it was in Texas, I called BULLSHIST and stopped the video.
Hey Pelon, all Texans aren't stier-shiebe artists.

Anyway, I too have to call em on this one. Increasing pressure inside of the fuel stream on a gasser may cause greater atomization of fuel but it better not have air or oxygen injected in the stream. You might create a large fireball if you're not careful. Also, changing operating parameters on today's computer controlled sensor monitored injection systems may cause the computers to compensate possibly negatively.

As suggested by Layback40, air in the diesel will cause many problems. If the fuel becomes increasingly compressible, inject-ability suffers.

You'd likely get better mileage by getting your injection pump tuned, new injectors, new rubber on fuel delivery and return hoses, adjusted valves, greased bearings, well maintained brakes, etc...
__________________
Codifex
1981 240D ChinaBlue (Got her running with a donor engine.)
1983 300DTurbo w/sunroof.
1984 300TD manual sunroof. (Electrical Gremlins)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-08-2011, 12:44 AM
Aquaticedge's Avatar
Bump on a log
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: See Biography
Posts: 3,148
I have my doubts on this device.....I've seen things that supposidly do the same thing on Ebay and it's all crap.
__________________
hum.....
1987 300TD 311,000M Stolen. Presumed destroyed
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2011, 02:04 AM
A work in process...
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 985
I met this guy at an auto parts store in Dallas. (I *think* he might still be alive.) Anyway, he'd built what he claimed to be a hydrogen production device for his gasoline engine. He popped the hood and showed it to me saying it made hydrogen out of water by electrolysis.

I'm not sure it actually electrolyzed the water but when he went to start it up, I backed off quite a few feet. I did see some bubbling inside the device but couldn't be sure it was hydrogen or just steam.

I took no chances.

I also didn't have the heart to try to explain to him that according to the laws of physics, you get less energy out of a system than you put into it. I don't care how much hydrogen he produced, he'd not get back the energy he expended converting it. Now, if it caused a more efficient burn of the fuel he put into the engine then maybe...

Systems like turbochargers use waste heat from the exhaust to compress air to increase efficiency of burn - a positive gain. While superchargers rob crankshaft power to do the same thing - still a positive gain but not as efficient as the turbo.
__________________
Codifex
1981 240D ChinaBlue (Got her running with a donor engine.)
1983 300DTurbo w/sunroof.
1984 300TD manual sunroof. (Electrical Gremlins)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-08-2011, 02:06 AM
Marvelicious's Avatar
Naturally Aggravated
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NW OR
Posts: 265
You want to know why we're skeptical? For me, I've seen even more gas saving devices than I've lived through ends-of-the-world. I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong, but until someone I take serious like consumer reports takes a crack at it, I'll be saving my money to buy fuel.
__________________
'82 300SD - Somewhere over 220k - Becoming reliable...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2011, 02:18 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by Codifex Maximus View Post
I also didn't have the heart to try to explain to him that according to the laws of physics, you get less energy out of a system than you put into it. I don't care how much hydrogen he produced, he'd not get back the energy he expended converting it. Now, if it caused a more efficient burn of the fuel he put into the engine then maybe...
I don't understand the chemistry but wouldn't combustion efficiency benefit more from more oxygen than more hydrogen?

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-08-2011, 08:15 AM
Rafi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden State
Posts: 474
This a great topic for Mythbusters to test.
I call it snake as well, minus the snake.

__________________
2010 ML350 Bluetec
2012 Mustang Convertible
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page