![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
240D's stick shift vs. the automatic? Looking
I was wanting to ask if the '83's were a better car with the stick shift vs. the automatic or not? Like for acceleration and like running on the highway.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Sticks will be a bit faster, you control the shift points.
Automatics take some horsepower to even move. As for once moving, negligible difference.
__________________
83 SD 84 CD |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Any year 240D, a manual Transmission is a better set up than one with an automatic transmission. The manual trans wakes them up some.
A manual trans 240 will get better mileage. the acceleration will be better. My bro in law has an 82 with over 140K miles on it and auto trans, our 80 240d has 359k and a manual trans. A yr and half abo we both went up to Portland, Or. we both filled up at the same Truck Stop in Lathrop, Ca. It is 100 miles east of Santa Cruz here on the coast. We got 100 miles into Oregon and he needed fuel. and we had enough and made it just shy of Portland. had a Motel in Wilsonville. we fueled there, it was 634 miles. we got 33.23mpg and he was getting 27. I have driven his car, and it is doggy compared to the manual trans. If you are shiftless, then I guess an auto trans is for you. ![]() ![]() These old W123 are old, so when you are looking at one, condition condition condition is important. You are buying deferred maintenance and prior neglect along with rust and accident damage. so which ever one you look at, better check everything over good. I don`t are what the owner says how wonderful his baby is. once you hand over the loot, it`s your baby now. ![]() Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616... 1) Not much power 2) Even less power 3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast. 80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I had an 83 240D manual....I liked it fine and found that it had adequate get-up-and-go for whatever I needed to do. But I remember thinking that I would NEVER want to own a 240D automatic...if it were much slower at all than the manual it would just be too sluggish.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 158k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 177k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver on Tan, 144k mi, wastegate conversion, ALDA delete 19 Honda CR-V EX 72k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
'06 E320 CDI '17 Corvette Stingray Vert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I've got a little perspective on the original question. I bought my 240D new and for the first 16 years it had an automatic transmission. For the last 14 years it has had a manual transmission. Same car, just different transmissions. Changing the car to a manual transmission was the best thing I ever did to that car. I say find a manual if you can.
__________________
Len '59 220S Cabriolet-SOLD and living happily in Malta '83 240D 351,500 miles original owner-SOLD '88 560SL 41,000 miles - totaled and parted out https://sites.google.com/site/mercedesstuff/home '99 E300 turbo 227,500 miles '03 SLK320 40,000 miles - gave to my daughter '14 Smart electric coupe 28,500 miles '14 Smart electric cabriolet 28,500 miles '15 Smart electric coupe 28,000 miles ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
This is so true!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
sometimes i wonder if there was ever an automatic 200D. aufgh!
__________________
'77 240D, 504H, OM617.952, etc. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Stick. I would never buy an automatic 240D.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 401,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 26,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. 99 Mazda Miata 183,xxx miles. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is there anything you might suggest beyond maybe jumper cables to take along for the tripping back?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Oh no -- here goes -- do not be intimidated!
Quote:
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... ![]() 1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod ![]() 2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die." |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
More important to a person like myself is a real serious look around at everything sometime before departure. Plus if the car has had no frequency of breakdown type issues as a general rule. Usually they will go the distance.
For example if the car has been developing issues say once every two months in general service that would impact roadability it is not going at my hands. Overall acquired true milage is another factor. I would much rather take a 123 with say 200k true miles across the country than one with 400k miles. Unless the majority of wear items are or have been replaced. Another general rule of mine is almost anything is easier to replace at home if there is any indication it is questionable at all before leaving. Yes I guess I am just an old fuddy duddy. Still my cars have always went there and back no matter whatever the milage travelled except on two occasions. Once I lost a rear wheel bearing in a volkswagon in Pennslyvania. And once I lost a front cv joint in upper Michigan. Both times there were no garages locally to take the car in. So with some effort I got the parts changed out myself. Luckily I could source those parts in the towns where the car was. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Having a 240D automatic that will hold upshifts to the original maximum speed in gear is also very important. I've driven lots of the purely vacuum controlled autos that shifted days too early.
My dad has a really nice 83 240 that we tuned the VCV and modulator back to spec and it will let you rev to the hash marks on the speedo in each gear and that car isn't noticeably slower than manual 240s I've driven and swapped. The manual is more fun but if a 240 is slow to you, a 240 4speed isn't a totally different car in my opinion. Regardless of gearing the car has 67hp.
__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500 Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Regardless of transmission choice, you're still pretty much out of steam at 77-78mph, and neither transmission will give you the magical ability to downshift at highway speed- by that point, the engine is wheezing pretty hard as it is.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I only take one item on these type of trips - my car trailer. Doing an assessment at the buyer's place is sketchy at best. Why set yourself up for an unpleasant trip? Pop it on the trailer, bring it home, and then go thru it from nose to tail and make it right so you know you can count on it from here on out.
Before I had the trailer I did these "bring it home" trips and I had about a 50/50 success ratio. Now I've upped my odds to 100%. Dan |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|